2
Zhoda2001 2 points ago +2 / -0

Privatbank was nationalized in 2016 and its auditors had their license suspended in 2017. I know it's like, a weird coincidence, but you never know.

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just don't know why this address is on the Quebec filing, though. I've gone over hell and high water to try and find out whether there was some sort of intermediary, registered agent or attorney located in that office and, barring one exception that happens to be an AMERICAN company operating the exact same sort of operation in Turkey, I haven't been able to put anyone else in that office until the mid-2010s or before January 2005

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're clearly getting subsidized from somewhere.

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qttps3dykOpSxfZ_WZ__BlQ_g3Ayb9oi/view?usp=sharing

FORBES ENERGY LIMITED is not a numbered Alberta corporation. It's also not a company that has ever showed up in association with that address. The two numbered Ontario corporations are clearly managed by the two founders since the addresses match on the filing. The question is whether this third stakeholder was listed concurrently with the date of incorporation January 23, 2007.

I went ahead and uploaded a PDF of the full filing - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gze7pj_p48jjV3rKxFx-8KoHIiA94dJU/view?usp=sharing

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where are we getting this info from, do we have access to primary sources and is it exclusive to the United States?

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, but they were incorporated at different times, sequentially. The first one was out of Canada.

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

Canada has privacy laws that the US doesn't have.

God damnit, fuck Canada. Okay. I don't know what to do anymore. Why can I pull so much information from Quebec? Everything is already there. I don't know how to take that filing to the next step. I'm losing my mind here. There has to be some kind of reason for Suite 1840 T2P 2T8 to be on that filing. It just doesn't make any sense unless it was one of the two companies I found there at the time of the initial filing.

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

God damnit I pulled the wrong link: https://businesssearch.sos.ca.gov/Document/RetrievePDF?Id=03295067-12578521

Immaterial though. Articles of Incorporation. Annual Reports. Where are those documents? Why is nobody looking for them?

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

They filed patents going back to 2005 regarding electronic voting tabulation and auditing. https://patents.justia.com/inventor/james-hoover?page=2

At the end of the day, WHY ARE WE DEBATING THIS POINT? Whether the code was developed by Smartmatic or Dominion, why can't you or I order public documents from Canada?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F4cv9Ieqbgx0Mn-yAZ8MoVgnh4pEbDvh/view?usp=sharing

Forget the god damned code for a minute and just assume that it comes hot loaded and ready to commit fraud. Who's payin for it?? That's the question.

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

They built the tech there. If someone was funneling laundered cash into them before they set up shops in the state it would have happened in Canada. They only moved to Colorado in the 2010s but they were doing shit internationally since 2003.

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

220 High Park Ave. is/was John Poulos's home address in Toronto

Who the hell is Eileen Crane? All I'm getting is some boomer winemaker who retired this year

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's true, they operated in Puerto Rico beginning in May 2011 - https://prcorpfiling.f1hst.com/CorpInfo/CorporationInfo.aspx?c=15343-112

BIN/BN, OCN, that's what we need. Records prior to 2007 when they filed in Quebec

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've laid out the problem in another thread link

They incorporated in Ontario in 2003 and in order to retrieve their documents from Service Ontario (the devil's den itself) you have to have the correct BIN and OCN numbers. If you try and do the "enhanced" business name search by entity name alone it costs $8 and yields absolutely nothing. I have scoured the web looking for some mention, any mention of those numbers and they aren't anywhere.

I don't know why. I'm not a probate attorney. I'm not an auditor. I'm just some retard on the internet and as far as I can tell, that's a suitable credential for me to run any major news network in the United States. I am just about ready to petition a nuclear first strike on Canada. Service Ontario is the most useless government entity I have ever seen in my entire life.

A Ukrainian oligarch has been laundering money into real estate across the fucking street from me for over a decade and the United States government, with all of its statistical auditing and affadavits filed IN COURT and available in the public record can't even be bothered to make the Articles of Incorporation for Dominion available for public consumption. I AM SICK OF THIS SHIT

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

EISCC

Election Assistance Commission

Elections Infrastructure ISAC

US Department of Homeland Security

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

IT ISAC

Now what do I do?

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

I CAN'T FIND THEM! IT'S BEEN WEEKS NOW. WHY THE HELL HAS NOBODY EVEN BOTHERED TO TALK ABOUT THIS IT'S LIKE NOBODY EVEN CARES SURELY TO GOD ONE PERSON OUT OF 75 MILLION HAS HAD THIS THOUGHT OCCUR TO THEM SURELY TO GOD I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE LIKE HERE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CHINESE OWNERSHIP BASED ON AN SEC FILING AS IF DOMINION IS EVEN A FUCKING AMERICAN COMPANY WHERE ARE ALL THE THINKING PATRIOTS HAS THE RAPTURE HAPPENED?????????????????????????????????????????????

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

This seems like such a simple and obvious thing. You can go to the California Secretary of State entity search website and it SHOWS that when they registered the California branch in 2010, they were using the Toronto Address. California SOS

It's got John Poulos's signature on it for God's sake. There are patents from 2005 that deal with vote tabulation and auditing that were filed by John Poulos and friends. link

John Poulos himself said he started the company in 2002. link

WHERE ARE THE ARTICLES OF GOD DAMNED INCORPORATION???

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just don't know where to go, people. I can't seem to get any help anywhere.

I am so close to getting a break on a Dominion/Ukraine money laundering pipeline. I can connect the two through filings in Quebec, you can read all about it here: link

But as far as I can tell (and I'm a pretty good researcher) nobody has even THOUGHT to order documents out of Canada. There's no BIN or OCN anywhere. Nobody has published the documents online. All we have seen are SEC filings. I do not have the professional background to know what to do next. Please help.

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just don't know where to go to find these documents. You do realize that Canadian companies are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. I'm no wall street guy but I'm pretty sure that means they don't have to report the shareholder configuration of their Canadian branches to the SEC.

2
Zhoda2001 2 points ago +2 / -0

To clarify. Service Ontario allows you to perform an Enhanced Business Name Search for $8. This is for you to have the privilege of knowing what Trade Names a company has used in the province and, I would imagine, the Ontario Corporation Number that would allow you to order documents (Articles of Incorporation, annual filings, change of address, etc.)

Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is viewable through Canada's Business Registries: This will show you

That registry page shows they incorporated in Ontario on January 14, 2003.

It also neglects to include the Business Identification Number (BN) or the Ontario Corporation Number (OCN)

So what am I missing here? It costs like $100 to order documents from Service Ontario and they are under absolutely no obligation to give you something back for your money. I'm $24 in the hole and have learned absolutely nothing.

Where the hell is this company?

EDIT:

In all seriousness, I could really use some help on this. If someone has worked probate or is an auditor or something and you've had to order documents from Ontario, can you give me a clue what I'm doing wrong?

1
Zhoda2001 1 point ago +1 / -0

So in 2007, Kroes started selling off its portfolios in Ukraine and Trinidad. Not long afterwards they used their working capital to purchase Vecta Energy. Then they just renamed themselves Vecta.

LINK

I've also got an SEC Form D describing the takeover, but I don't remember where I got it.

The Transatlantic Petroleum thing is a serious problem. I've got Form 20-F filed in August, 2006 with that address on it.

LINK

I don't know why it's there, but that form lists 3 directors who are using that office as their principle address.

There are 5-6 offices in suite 1840 so that still leaves 2-3 if they were sharing space in January 2007. The problem is that Kroes lists 8 people on their board of directors. That doesn't mean they all worked in that office and, since they were traded on TSX rather than SEC, I haven't been able to find anything except bulletins. I will say, Darrell Zakreski seemed to always have a lot of time on his hands, from what I've been able to research.

LINK

As for Forbes, well, I don't think it is a real company. I think it's a shell entity that Ukrainian oligarchs used to funnel laundered money out of Privatbank in Ukraine. TFW you find a Ukrainian oligarch has been laundering money into real estate across the street from you.

LINK

And the civil complaint - LINK

EDIT: A month ago, when I went to Transatlantic Petroleum's website everything was hunky dory. I could look at their Turkey operation, board of directors, mission statement, etc. Then this happened: http://www.transatlanticpetroleum.com/

I don't know what it means but it sure seems like strange timing.

EDIT 2: Okay I guess I can add links. Here's the Temporary Form D for the Kroes Vecta Merger FORM D Temp

EDIT 3: And here's the first snapshot of Kroesenergy.com/contact that shows them in suite 1840, T2p2t8 on January 20, 2005 - LINK

Prior to that they were in the next building over.

2
Zhoda2001 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't know about pep.org but I've been doing searches with the icij database for a while. I literally just found some New Zealander who was financing Mexican drug cartels with money laundered through a chemical company in Ukraine. I feel bad for those Ukrainians.

Thanks

EDIT: And yes it's fantastic to have another set of eyes on the problem. The best I can get out of 4chan is antisemitism and people telling me to off myself. I'm glad there are other people with knowledge and abilities I don't have who are interested in tackling this dig.

2
Zhoda2001 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kolomoisky has been buying up properties in the United States and funneling stolen Privatbank money into them. One of them is literally across the street from my house.

https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/san-antonio/news/2020/09/24/dallas-real-estate-entangled-in-international-money-laundering-probe

The criminal complaint gives a lot of insight into how the Cypriot entities were used to launder the money. It's as simple as you can imagine, and exactly as I feared.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1302006/download

  1. Kolomoisky and Boholiubov, with the assistance of Manager 1, Manager 2, and others, caused PrivatBank (via BOK) to issue billions of dollars in loans to companies they owned or controlled (“related parties”). The related parties included, among others, Zaporozhye Ferroalloy Plant (“ZFZ”), Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant (“NZF”), and Ordzhonikidze Mining & Processing Plant (“OGZK”), all of which were owned by Kolomoisky and Boholiubov.
  1. For instance, loan applications totaling more than $126 million were submitted under NZF’s name in 2010 alone.
  1. The loan applications were almost always fraudulent. The most glaring misrepresentation was the stated “purpose” of the loan. Loan applications included a section requiring the applicant to describe the loan’s purpose. The applications submitted by the related parties often claimed that the purpose was to fund ongoing operations of the business entity applying for the loan. Instead, the money was sent wherever Kolomoisky and Boholiubov wanted, and was often used by a completely different entity, for whatever purpose they devised. Those misrepresentations were material: the loan agreements stated that the loans must be used for the purpose stated in the application.

This is completely consistent with what we're seeing on the Quebec filing for Dominion. I still haven't finished reading the complaint but I know you're on the right track with the IMF loans. They must have been funneling the IMF payments to the NBU which then went to Privatbank without oversight by the government. Read the complaint. Kolomoisky and his partner had 90% control of Privatbank between them and chose their own auditor, which I believe was the Ukrainian branch of PricewaterhouseCooper.

Also remember, Burisma Holdings is a Cyprus based company.

2
Zhoda2001 2 points ago +2 / -0

God bless you friend. I'm going to go through your sources and look for opportunities. I'll also take a look back at the HSGAC report on Hunter and Burisma from 2018 to see if I can source the Privatbank/Burisma connection. What I've read is that Zlochevsky somehow or another had ~$24 million laundered through the Latvian branch of Privatbank.

Sketching out the laundering pipeline is really tough, but let's give each other some time. I found an investor forum for shareholders in the parent company of Zhoda (Swedish companies are bizarre) and one of them found some really bizarre inconsistencies in Zhoda Investments' financial reporting on their 3 Ukrainian licenses in the early 2010s. It also claims that Kolomoisky had a 55% stake in the Kashtan JV, which directly connects him to the Calgary office listed on the Quebec filing for Dominion in January 2007.

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redeye.se%2Farena%2Fposts%2Fshelton-petroleum-shelton-petroleum-en-bubbla-tom-pa-gas-men-fylld-av-uppblasta-forvant

I've got SEC filings referencing the Kashtan Joint Venture going all the way back to 1996 and press releases that show the acquisition of Zhoda 2001 Corporation was concurrent with the Dominion Quebec filing and that the private placement reimbursed the seller with shares in the buyer's company, Shelton Canada Corp.

Getting meat on the Ukraine side is going to be tough because a lot of the direct evidence has been classified or otherwise not released. There might be something out there that somebody forgot to scrub. We may have to settle for Means, motive, and opportunity. The important thing is to challenge prospective evidence to see whether it supports alternative explanations. If it does, it isn't evidence. It's opportunity.

I'll keep coming back to this thread so if you want to post here I'll definitely see it. For the time being, let me look at these sources and I'll get back to you here.

view more: Next ›