I'd argue they have things exactly where they want them with the current border policy.

They don't want to just legalize everyone, because there's now an infrastructure built around housing, feeding, and providing amenities to the people trapped in border facilities. Furniture-focused companies like Wayfair are scant miles from some of these border facilities, and the state or federal government gives groups like these millions of dollars to provide beds, chairs, drawers, and so forth for every cell. Then there's replacement and maintenance which allows even more business to get their fingers in the pie.

They want to make sure the border facilities are always at capacity or over capacity, because that means the tax money can keep flowing out of the official coffers and into private coffers.

The reason they want to reduce the barriers to entry is because that doesn't affect the infrastructure they've built around border facilities. Reducing the number of judges capable of taking asylum cases or controlling the number of cases they can complete per day are easy ways to ensure the border facilities stay full even if the requirements for asylum were reduced to just "first and last name please."

As to why they want this mass migration, it's largely to drive costs down further for business and increase the government-dependent population. By making work less available, people are forced into welfare. Once they're on welfare, they are extremely likely to vote for the party that maintains/expands welfare.

Making illegal immigrants legal is largely because they're more useful as voters than they are as slaves that work for cheap with the constant threat of deportation to keep them cheap. It's similar to the three fifths compromise, where the illegal population is significant enough to change demographics, but it means nothing if they can't eke a vote out of them.

I wouldn't be surprised if whatever bill comes out makes these illegal immigrants capable of voting, but the compromise is that they can still be deported because they're not completely citizens.

To be fair, the Gates Foundation and the WHO's previous method of population control involved causing miscarriages. Just ask Kenya about their WHO-provided Tetanus vaccines in 90's. Because the Kenyan government didn't trust the WHO after that, it took a lot of funding from the Gates Foundation to sufficiently bypass the Kenyan government in 2014 and do it a second time.

I doubt it'd be something as blatant as what they did in 2014 (lace with HCG to such a degree that independent chemical testing detected it, demand people get 5 doses even though regular immunization takes 2-3, specifically ignore men/children/older women).

Who decides what is and what isn't a lie? Where is the line between insanity and righteous fury?

Lennon was allegedly assassinated because of a book. Should we ban all books because fiction is a lie that has caused more murder, and thus books are horrible? Or, should we assume the man claiming a century-old book told him to kill someone today was insane?

I will agree that some ideas are horrible, but it's ridiculous to argue that opinions on historic events should be oppressed because it can lead to horrible ideas in the present. It's like banning sugar because it could eventually lead to a meth addiction. Yes, it's technically possible to go from point A to point B, but it's fallacious to assume that most (or even enough) people will turn out the same way to justify such a ban. The more likely answer is that the person that went from A to B had more problems than just access to sugar to get to that meth addiction, and maybe one should target something else to fix it.

Ideas?

Democrats are set to control the house, the senate, and the executive, meaning any federal change to voting will need to contradict their narrative of zero voter fraud. They will likely attempt to expand or enshrine their methods of fraud. Future acts of fraudulence will use 2020 as an example of how to avoid detection better.

We can seek change at the state/district level, such as:

• Replacement of vote-counting machines with ones that follow FEC regulations (less than 0.000004% failure rate, no internet connection)

• Better tracking of voters to prevent illegal votes (voter ID, keeping the link between voter and vote tied directly to ballot)

• Greater oversight on counting locations. For example, cameras on every counter with boxes clearly labeled (state - district number - box number), livestreamed so everyone can review their work.

• Faster and clearer response and punishment to counting locations going rogue (obfuscating observation, counting without sufficient observation, erroneously entering ballots)

• Better process to challenge questionable ballots such that they are not counted until investigated.

If we can get enough states to instate these, they're basically going to turn red and stay red as long as the red candidate isn't shit. The problem is that democrats have got their hooks into more than half the electoral votes and know to protect their false majority by any means necessary. Even if they get the electoral college abolished, they'll still need to cheat in enough states to maintain a majority of senators and representatives.

536 lengths of rope.

435 for each member of the House. 100 for each member of the Senate. 1 for Pence. Put one name per rope.

The ones that do the right thing have their rope handed to them. The ones that don't, get their rope in a slightly different way. 100% of Congress will vote to correct this, one way or another.

They do this bullshit on purpose to distract people. They don't want real news circulating. Empty, pointless topics that get people mad over nothing is excellent camouflage. The extra noise drowns the signal of real topics, like the active coup Democrats are attempting to pull with this last election and the outright tyranny they're establishing within our states.

It's always a shame when someone decides to commit suicide by filling a pillow sack with doorknobs to beat themselves to death.

So I looked into where this was from. Here's a link to his full speech, with the offending statement occurring shortly after the 9 minute mark.

It seems this was a gaffe where Joe was quoting someone (implying Trump or someone in his administration said it) for his first sentence, then repeated "end of quote" to his opinionated second sentence. Basically, they were performing a manipulation to make idiots think Trump said things he hasn't ever said, but because Joe is addled, he fucked up and repeated end of quote on his opinionated half.

I could delve into the rest of his speech, but I'd rather not waste my time listening and transcribing 40 minute of bullshit for posterity.

Too many factors to really consider at this time. Wisconsin's self-defense law has already been eroded in court, where "too extreme of self-defense" invalidates it. They could argue that an AR is too extreme, or that shooting at multiple people is grounds to invalidate self-defense. The jury could be tainted/poorly picked, or a bad defense lawyer may convince him to just plead guilty to "lesser" charges or provide no defense. A lazy/bad judge may allow for tampering or political leakage in his courtroom. Furthermore, a Biden victory may create pressure to obey the mob/left for court cases that ended up on the wrong side of the riots protests.

For example, the prosecutor would only need to argue that an automatic rifle is not a measured response to having a bottle thrown at him and someone getting in his face. This tainted version of the narrative (ignores that it was a molotov that was thrown at him, ignores that the initial protester assaulted the teen) could then be used to invalidate his self-defense.

Ideally, you are correct.

He did not fire additional shots after getting up, those were shots elsewhere (as evidenced by him becoming more alert after hearing them, likely concerned that someone may be shooting at him from a distance).

Kyle Rittenhouse is a teenager that was in Kenosha defending local businesses from rioters. He attempted to intercede with rioters attacking a business, to which they attacked him. It is currently not known if this attack included a gun being pulled and/or fired at him, but that is currently one of the rumors floating around.

Kyle shot one man in the head, killing him. He started to create distance between himself and the mob, to which a couple began to chase after him. He tripped over himself while running, then shot a second rioter in the chest, killing a second. A third rioter pulled a gun of his own, and was shot in the bicep by Kyle.

Kyle then left the scene, returning to his home in another state. He turned himself into his own police station shortly after returning. Wisconsin is seeking 2 counts of first degree murder and crossing state lines to evade arrest/justice.

In my opinion, it was self-defense, making the first-degree murder a bogus charge. Evading police is also untrue, as he turned himself in before the police even knew who to look for.

It's word salad that means "allow us to do whatever we say with what and how we teach children." Quite literally anything can be justified under it.

For example, if a teacher were to start beating their students if they were white, male, or heterosexual, they could argue they're bringing equity to that group by granting them experiences that they believe non-whites, non-males, or non-heterosexuals receive. Same with verbally abusing them, locking them in cages, intentionally giving them non-passing grades even though they complete work correctly, and so forth.

On the other end of the spectrum, they can also use such wording to justify giving students passing grades when they did nothing or did it completely incorrectly, refuse to punish students for aggressive activities, and so forth. After all, a white heterosexual male probably received a similar benefit at some point throughout all of history, therefore justifying giving all students that benefit as they see fit. And if they didn't, it's a different expression in repaying a finite amount of the infinite debt white heterosexual males have to pay.

In short, they're evil people and they're trying to find the right words that'll get you to believe it's not evil.

I disagree. Employees that disagree with this should continue working at Goodyear, but keep an eye out for other work while providing an inferior service/product to customers of Goodyear.

In a best case scenario, they find better/equal work and can leave.

In an average case scenario, Goodyear sees monetary losses and is forced to lay off people. Since no one willingly quit, they'll have to decide more or less randomly on who gets the boot, which means people that dislike the policy may stay on to continue causing harm while people that agree with the policy may get the boot.

Having the employees willfully quit is one of the worse scenarios, as Goodyear won't have to pick who gets laid off and they keep the woke ones.

This may even be an intentional action from the company to get people out. One of my first jobs did this when they hired too many people and there was less contract work than anticipated. They made a bunch of absurd demands of the employees, then waited for people to quit. Seeing as Goodyear is all about tires and the lockdown has greatly decreased the number of cars on the road, this may be Goodyear's method of downsizing their workforce for a more desirable outcome.

They've still been there, just largely unsuccessful. They've tried LGP, LGBP, LGBTP, LGBTQAP, and they've tried to argue that the + includes them. They've been denied every time. In 2017, they tried bringing a banner that the protesters were there for, but they added NAMBLA and something about pedophile acceptance. The banner was destroyed by the protesters.

Their newest vectors of attack are MAPs (Minor-attracted person) alongside Ephebophile (attraction to teenagers) or Hebephile (attracted to pubescent children). Basically, they've recognized that nobody will ever accept someone running under the title of pedophile, so they're trying to make up new names that aren't as easily recognized as being a pedophile.

They're all still pedophiles, and they all deserve a cage or a bullet.

I'm reading up on this, and it seems it's not even the first time, nor did it go undetected by the Kenyan government. Mid-November of 2014, they released a statement that was reported on here. This refers to another separate scandal that occurred in 1993/1994, which seems to have done the same thing: add beta-HCG to Tetanus shots to increase the chance of miscarriage or cause outright infertility. 5 doses and infertility was guaranteed.

However, it may not be intended for whites, but rather, it's intended for blacks. Blacks have consistently had a higher death toll to this "sickness" ratio-wise and a greater chunk of the population is firmly behind the party that'll encourage its use. Assuming it's split exactly down the party line, they could knock out 80% of the black population. At those numbers, they'd basically not recover.

Or, perhaps it's just a way to force dependency on globalism. Make generations unable to reproduce, rapidly cull the population, force immigration to be the main way to keep numbers stable.

Total democrat votes: 2,021,527 (34.5% for Biden)

Total republican votes: 2,007,314 (94.1% for Trump)

Don't get complacent.

If you would like to know more, here's a daily mail article for the event. It appears this may have been a black mother (does not appear to be so), but it does have this gem from the mother of individual that flying-kicked the child:

He didn't try to kick that baby, he tried to jump over the baby on to her and made a mistake. My kid is not the type to kick a baby, accidents happen.

It also seems the mother being attacked may have been pregnant.

We'll need to see what /pol/ does with the idea, but here's a rough draft of a message that could be used:

Title: Anti-Pedo Movement

What is this?

In the wake of Wayfair, Maxwell, Epstein, and numerous other scandals involving the exploitation of children, it has become apparent that not enough is being done to protect our children from sick and demented individuals.

800,000 children are reported missing in the United States every year. Each day, 112 children are kidnapped by someone they don't know, with even more left unknown or never found. These statistics just get worse when you look beyond our borders, along with the potential of our children being shipped out of the country to be diddled by foreigners to make it even harder to detect.

In education, there's people pushing sex education into lower and lower grades. In Ireland, Roderick O'Gorman is seeking to add masturbation to the curriculum for 6 year olds and he wants to allow 12 year olds to undergo HRT without parental consent. It's O'Gorman's stances that caused this protest and counterprotest.

We have people transitioning and pimping their underage children in public, and there are actually sick fucks out there protecting it. Here's one example from New York.

Something should have been done about this years ago, and instead we all sit complacent that surely our politicians will do something about it soon. The hard truth is that politicians have had their chance to fix things, but instead chose to gloss over and hope the fire would die down with time.

Why should we do it?

This can be the right's version of BLM, a blank check to say and go wherever we please. Any stance that the Anti-Pedo Movement takes now means anyone against it is for pedophilia.

De Blasio has banned all protests and large gatherings outside of BLM (source). While New Yorkers can go out and pretend they're for BLM, that still reinforces and empowers BLM. On the other hand, if you go out and protest pedophilia, De Blasio is forced to either weaken his own rules again for a "right-leaning" protest group, or he must commit political suicide and defend pedophilia to follow the rules he's made.

The left goons in government and their antifa pawns will either have to join us and agree, or take the opposite stance of encouraging the exploitation of children. That will certainly horrify the politically uninitiated to the right.

This could help in kneecapping BLM protests. At this time, they lack a defined goal and most of the protests are there to bait for outrage. As Don Lemon has said, BLM is solely for police brutality against black people. The Anti-Pedo Movement has definitive goals that have not yet been met, its ideas are palatable to a much wider audience, and it had actual statistics to argue that its goals can help black lives more than BLM's limited scope.

What are we against?

• Human trafficking

• Kidnapping

• Sexual exploitation of minors

• Pornographic content including minors

• Corruption of our educational systems

• The existence of pedophile advocacy groups

• Damaging the second amendment (if our right to personal protection is removed/crippled, the ability to protect our children dies with it)

• Defunding or abolishing the police (weakening our police means more children can be exploited)

• Destruction of protections for children to placate the mentally ill.

How can we start?

Get some APM signs, organize a group, and start making demands. You can likely convert BLM protesters to an APM protest by simply arguing that each day, more black children are abducted by strangers than unarmed black people were killed by police across the entire year of 2019.

If anyone gets in your way or disagrees with your movement, they're a pedophile or a pedophile sympathizer.

I'm mostly shocked that Snopes managed to get to the very bottom of this whole thing within 6 hours of it becoming a public talking point. It was, in fact, even faster than Wayfair's single work-day investigation.

Put a Biden hat on the sink in California and you'll get an extra ballot.

Can this be verified?

Hard to verify outright, but here's the circumstantial evidence in favor of it being Ghislaine:

• The account has posted near-daily until Maxwell's arrest on July 1st.

• One gap in posting was December 7th, 2011 to December 10th, 2011, which is exactly when the Kleiner Perkins party occurred. This is the party where future Reddit CEO Ellen K. Pao admitted via twitter that she saw Ghislaine at said party but didn't want to have a photo taken with her because she knew about Ghislaine supplying underage girls for sex.

• Another gap in posting occurred from August 7th, 2013 to August 10th, 2013, which matches up very well with Ghislaine's mother's death (August 7th, 2013).

• Another gap in posting occurred between October 11th, 2013 to October 13th, 2013, which matches up with Ghislaine's speech in a Plenary session on October 12th, 2013, which required travel.

• Maxwellhill opted to post this thing about how child porn should be decriminalized. An interesting top response was from Goatstein (Epstein?), who decided to write out what the link was saying in shorter form, likely because this user knew people would avoid exposing themselves to a site that promoted child porn.

• The reddit user mentioned their birthday is in December, which matches with Ghislaine Maxwell.

• Accounting for time zones, maxwellhill appeared to be posting within the same timezone as Ghislaine was, assuming they were awake and active during normal hours of the day.

One thing that should be remembered is that, now that this has been publicized, it is possible for Reddit to crack open the account and put someone else in control of it, in order to hide that it was Ghislaine Maxwell for all these years.

All pictures used can also be accessed through this cluster link.

Why would she spend time on reddit instead of doing other things?

When you're rich enough, literally everything is secured without needing effort. What do you think these people do with all that spare time? They find ways to make themselves busy. Some find new hobbies/distractions, others seek to ensure their wealth is never threatened, and a few ignore their post-scarcity reality and continue seeking to chase more wealth.

Anonymous forum use allows them to socialize without their lofty reputation messing with the conversation.

until we have tried our best to disprove it.

The best proof against it is that Maxwell Hill is a potentially common name. However, we'd need to find someone that meets all criterion that the existing user has mentioned about themselves while also being a Maxwell Hill. Regardless, I believe whoever maxwellhill ends up being, they should probably be pursued or put on a list for their stance on child pornography.

I'm of the belief that they know COVID-19 isn't that lethal, so they're doing everything they can to pump the numbers up. What you have to remember is that many of these democrat governors and politicians intentionally went overboard to cause economic harm (because bad economy = bad for standing president in an election year). They blocked hydroxychloroquine because it could have driven down death rates, which might have caused them to ease quarantine restrictions. Now, they don't need that. They've got 15 times as many "cases" and all it takes is natural deaths to get counted as a COVID-19 death.

If we kept things honest (only positive tests, only if death was related to disease, sought improvements to ensure only COVID-19 is detected), we'd likely be showing signs of recovery as all the people that would have died to COVID-19 are already dead. However, they need this quarantine to last up to November so they can force mail-in ballots.

The CDC changed COVID-19 deaths to include anyone that dies while being a "probable case" on April 11th. Before April 11th, the only COVID-19 deaths that were counted to the total was people that tested positive, then died for any reason.

Obviously, this is not perfectly accurate. For example, a person that dies from a bullet to the head after testing positive would be counted as a COVID-19 death prior to April 11th. However, the redefinition caused all "probable" cases to be counted as COVID-19 cases, and any that die while being "probable" is counted as a COVID-19 death.

After April 11th (and assuming states decided to comply with the CDC's redefinition), what was previously one case became 16. On May 11th, Texas decided to adopt the CDC's redefinition, and their DHS started calling on the various counties to obey the new process. Collin County initially resisted this by holding this meeting on May 18th (if you want the infographic they used, you can find it here). On June 1st, Collin County was forced to comply, and their cases and deaths skyrocketed. Why? Because the new system deemed Texas endemic to COVID-19, meaning anyone in Texas that shows any signs, like coughing or sweating, could be deemed a probable case. Another rule is that if you've been in close contact with a probable case, you also become a probable case.

We should also not forget that the COVID-19 test only tests for the entire branch of coronaviruses, as admitted by the CDC here. What else is a coronavirus? The common cold. Therefore, if you have a cold and get tested, you'll test positive, and then the new probable cases rule makes all coworkers and family you've interacted with for the last month probable cases, adding to the total number of new cases and counting their death toward COVID-19 as well.

I know my most memorable occasion with a black individual was when they went out of their way to bump into me. Started screaming that I was a racist and a slave-owner, shoved me to the ground after saying my apology wasn't good enough.

Shame it happened when I was 14 and it was the second black person I'd ever interacted with. Pretty sure that event was what made me anxious around black people I don't already know. I've sought to justify his actions in any number of ways, but ultimately, that unstable mind was a danger to me and I couldn't recognize it before I got burned. Therefore, I keep away until I can be sure their mind is stable.

They're not sensitive. They're pretending to be victimized by the words of others, because they recognize people usually favor helping/supporting the victim. Paired with the idea that words are violence, it also allows them to claim the opponent threw the first blow and thus they're justified in any possible action they can take.

I can tell you now that this article was likely made for one of the following reasons:

• To signal to Reddit that they should try to sue this site for copying the "reddit style,"

• To threaten the hosting group to drop support for this site.

• To inform leftists that don't normally get out of their bubble that they should go here to be toxic and "stick it to drumpf"