0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

I do not expect others to be at his level. You shouldn't either

Did I say I needed them to be at his level, or not corrupt? Why can't you read? Just fucking read. There's no argument fuck face, quit looking for one. I WILL NOT SUPPORT A CORRUPT POLITICIAN RETARD! NEITHER SHOULD YOU. Simple enough?

0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

So, Trump spoiled you and you refuse to support anyone that you do not believe to be on his level?

You don't have to put words in my mouth and then make little comments on what you want me to have said. Unless of course by "Trump's level" you mean "not corrupt" then hell fucking yes that's what I mean. I will not support someone corrupt.

2
_deleted_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

You're not dropping some holy knowledge here, I can do without the patronization. Politicians are corrupt. A statement being "broken" to nobody.

However, Trump taught us many things, one of those things being that we can have politicians who aren't corrupt. He was the embodiment of that fact. So now that I've had the filet mignon, no, I refuse to accept anything less than the best. You're telling me "eat your expired ground beef, and pay for it". Fuck. That.

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +5 / -2

Fuck that. I don't need a fucking dog to sit because he expects a treat. I need a dog to sit because I tell him to. I'm the master. These fucking clowns played us all throughout Trump's term and many gave donations. The minute it didn't serve them to support Trump, they turned tail faster than I've ever seen. Those slimy fucking pieces of shit can rot in hell for all I care. Not one red hot cent, not now, not ever. EVER.

MTG does what she does because she's a patriot. I don't want someone doing "the right thing" because they get paid. THAT'S corruption.

2
_deleted_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

Didn't she have some massive bombshell that was supposed to bring down the house of cards that she built up but never released? She has some fucking balls to complain about msm

2
_deleted_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

Is this part of the plan I'm supposed to trust? Wait, what time did he announced this, let me find a Q post that correlates.

2
_deleted_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

I really don't care if he's innocent or guilty, it's not my business. Nobody in charge cares if he's innocent either. It's a psyop. They just waited until a black dude died in police custody, and started creating the narrative.

They want a police like the UK has; willing to act on their fellow citizens in extremely unethical and invasive ways when white people are involved. Here's the steps, and it's super fucking easy and working like a charm.

  • Create artificial racial divide, blame the system/police

  • Pit police and citizens against each other, police against police and citizen against citizen

  • When all comes to a head, throw the sacrificial officer under the bus. You are here

  • Instruct your police to not confront black people no matter the situation. News claims police are no longer racist and can be trusted - keep this narrative alive!

  • Police are soon knocking on your door for online wrong-think.

And now America is dead! Congrats, were an Islamic state in 2 decades.

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

The two aren't exclusive.

13
_deleted_ 13 points ago +15 / -2

You've been conditioned to think conspiracy theory = crazy. Anyone who looks at the facts surrounding gun control in relation to mass shootings and doesn't at least seriously consider something fishy is going on is a fucking retarded ape who should be openly mocked.

11
_deleted_ 11 points ago +12 / -1

Only if you walk around acting like it. Retards who can't wipe their ass clean telling me to wear a mask? "No thanks" and keep moving. I didn't elect high school drop out LaQueefa from Target to tell me how to live my mother fucking life. Don't act like your freedoms are gone, or they WILL push the line further and further until it's a reality. Nobody is going to protect your freedoms but you.

4
_deleted_ 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's one of those thoughts that you actively try to avoid, that sometimes creeps up on you when you're trying to sleep.

8
_deleted_ 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yeah I'm not fighting you on that. But my statement was never meant to be about this part of the discussion.

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah, sure. I don't disagree, but that's not the point I'm making.

We're not talking about how you would feel if it happened, we're talking about the feeling you have thinking about it now, fearing it might happen.

As a parent of every known gender, I can say my fears for one gender differs from the fear I have for the other. For instance, in my mind, it's much more likely for a boy to break a leg playing sports than it is for him to be raped by a man. Now, maybe that's an accurate opinion, maybe it's not. Doesn't matter, it's not the point. The vast majority of people worry differently for different people in their lives.

So when someone says "killing someone who rapes your daughter is unreasonable" I must assume it's because they either don't have kids at all, or have only boys, and therefore they can't really imagine that actually happening to their sons the way one might fear it happening to their daughter. So they conflate their perceived likelihood of it happening to their son with the severity of the stated reaction -or more simple they can't really envision it, so the statement about killing a rapist seems extreme.

In either case, addressing them as daughterless is appropriate.

In my opinion, if you're a father who wouldn't at least consider killing your daughters rapist? You don't really love your daughter. Sure, same for a son. But until it happens, I'm more concerned about him wrecking his motorcycle, dig?

1
_deleted_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

Worse. It's real but they adjourned and the bill is now dead. Repubs playing political theatre.

15
_deleted_ 15 points ago +18 / -3

People disagreeing do not have a daughter and cannot relate to a love deep enough to agree with this.

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

Lethal force is only justified to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm to a human being.

https://i.imgflip.com/54353n.jpg

0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

But I don’t blindly follow everything he says.

This sentence is out of place.

  1. Nobody accused anyone of blindly following someone.

  2. I don't recall Trump telling us to do a single thing except vote and peacefully protest.

view more: Next ›