2
_deleted_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

You know for a fact that every single court is corrupt???

Well firstly I didn't say "all", I said "the". You know for a fact that every single court isn't corrupt? Because when you reach an imbalance of >50%, you're in the majority. At that point, you can refer to its' whole as what the majority is, for arguments sake.

Keep telling people that every court is corrupt, that votes don't matter and that we will never win again

Can you point out where I said any of that?

'll be right here to tell you to stop being such a fucking child and whining that "nothing will happen" blah blah blah.

.... k. Thanks... but can you point out where I whined or said nothing will happen? Thanks.

How about this, I can place a bet with you. If Lindell's case in question leads to us "winning", I'll donate $1000 to the charity of your choice. If not, you donate $1000 to the charity of my choice. Of course we need to clearly define what "winning" means and some other details to square it up. Sound good?

56
_deleted_ 56 points ago +62 / -6

He never said not to support Lindell. How the fuck did you jump to that conclusion? He's being a realist, the courts are corrupt. I support Lindell, but there's a good chance this ends up a stalemate, even if they had video evidence of everyone admitting they committed fraud.

7
_deleted_ 7 points ago +7 / -0

How do you delete someone else's comment?

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can't show me statistical evidence that you're a doctor so shit the fuck up.

4
_deleted_ 4 points ago +5 / -1

You’re seriously asking me if death the only metric? Last I checked our side only cares about death in the context of Covid.

Holy fuck what a fucking weak ass attempt at a strawman. Reported for being a fake Trump supporter. Bye fake doctor!

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

30 million people getting it and over 99.999% of them being fine is my evidence.

Being fine? You mean not dying as per leftist sources. Wow I feel better already! And is death your only metric? About about long term problems? Sterilization? Bells palsy? Cancer? What's the 10 year study on this? What about it's interaction with other drugs? What about genetic complications? Where's the studies on that? Unless you have a source for everyone "being fine"? No? Thought not! Oh, and what are your thoughts on the fake vaccine essentially being useless?

I never told you you can’t choose to be cautious. That’s up to you. Do whatever you want.

A) You're attacking everyone who dares question it with "sHoW mE tHe PeEr ReViEwEd MeDiCaL jOuRnAlS!!!" When the point everyone is on is: there's not enough research into a 3 month old gene therapy which is not approved by the FDA to trust it at all, and you very clearly have a problem with that. B) I will do whatever I want, I don't need you to tell me, thanks.

You're a piece of shit liberal doing a very poor job of pretending to be conservative. Looking through your comments might as well say "hello fellow conservatives! What liberal do we hope dies today?" Screen cap this and take it back to/r/politics.

7
_deleted_ 7 points ago +10 / -3

I'd love to see statistical evidence that it isn't. Why are you advertising an experimental gene therapy shot as a vaccine, and why are you promoting an FDA unapproved shot as safe? What the fuck do you know about it? People are very very right to be cautious of anything the government sponsors and rushes out the door. You don't have enough evidence to have the opinion of it "not being dangerous". I'll be skeptical until I see your "statistical evidence", and probably afterword if it comes from a leftist source (hint: it will).

Funny, ever hear of the saying "there's three types of lies; lies, damn lies, and statistics"? In which direction do you think the people standing to profit from a 'vaccine' are going to tilt the scales when it comes to any statistical analysis? Are you one of those people who think big pharma is out to help people and not about a profit? What's the medical industry worth again?

4
_deleted_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

We're only supposed to trust experts if they agree with the globohomo/big pharma agenda.

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

Anderson to Trump: Yes or no, are you going to stop being racist? And follow-up; fuck you, I hope you and your whole family gets raped and dies!

Anderson to Biden: Hi. How are you? .... Follow-up; What'd you have for breakfast 😘?

1
_deleted_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody ever mentions the down side of town limits. The biggest being a fresh new batch of brainwashed ultra-communist college grads every few years each with a new color of hair and unique pronoun, who get to steer our country in the direction they choose.

I'm not saying I'm not for term limits, but this is an extremely under addressed issue that needs solving if term limits are implemented.

0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +4 / -4

Andrew is entirely correct about Parler, they're the controlled opposition for people leaving the mega corps.

"Quick! Shut down our controlled oppositions servers completely for months! Quick! Remove it from the app store and iTunes store! Quick, demonize the user base!"

This theory doesn't pass the sniff test even a little bit.

4
_deleted_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

You love to see it. Looks like someone put on his brave big boy pants and left his echo chamber to come play in the shallow end, only to jump in and discover it's actually the deep end, and people have facts to back up their shit talking. Time to scurry back to your pedophile pool, hoss. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

1
_deleted_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol what? He literally started PayPal. That was what he is first known for. He took on the banks back in the 90's when he was still going bald.

view more: Next ›