There were no fake ballots
The ballots where real ballots but they printed out extra
lol ok. Fags are allowed here but you have to wait at least 10 minutes after sucking a cock to post. Same rules as swimming after a meal.
Take with a grain of salt, but I read that there were secret water marks on the ballots and each ballot was registered to QFS blockchain. The thread also alleged the democrats obviously knew nothing about this, so voter fraud is going to be easy to uncover. If true, Trump baited the democrats who printed millions of fake ballots not knowing about the watermark or blockchain (which is impossible to duplicate).
The plan is to recount, Trump will eek by and barely win, the dems will naturally demand a re-recount at which point they will have sprung the trap and the massive voter fraud gets exposed. Then it's clear Trump wins in a massive landslide victory.
This was all on a Twitter thread, so again grain of salt. However, I keep going back to Lindsey Graham almost laughing on election night saying something to the effect "I spoke to the president. He's going to win... and he's going to win big. You pollsters have no idea what you're doing"
There is currently a video of some lady showing "dots" which could be a watermark? She said she read they were supposed to be little dots but doesn't say where she read that. So it could be anything, plus she only examines the tear-off tab of the ballot, not the actual ballot. So right now it's a big question mark.
Video: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBLfU3S/video-proof-of-watermark-on-offi/c/
And how will you prove the democrats were behind this?
Not my job. But if we can put a man on the moon, we can find election fraud. If it can't be proven, then obviously you can't disqualify anyone. Not hard to understand.
It really is. I hope to be proven wrong though.
Also: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBLewQJ/i-have-a-feeling-these-things-co/c/
Take with a grain of salt, but I read that there were secret water marks on the ballots and each ballot was registered to QFS blockchain. The thread also alleged the democrats obviously knew nothing about this, so voter fraud is going to be easy to uncover. If true, Trump baited the democrats who printed millions of fake ballots not knowing about the watermark or blockchain (which is impossible to duplicate).
The plan is to recount, Trump will eek by and barely win, the dems will naturally demand a re-recount at which point they will have sprung the trap and the massive voter fraud gets exposed. Then it's clear Trump wins in a massive landslide victory.
This was all on a Twitter thread, so again grain of salt. However, I keep going back to Lindsey Graham almost laughing on election night saying something to the effect "I spoke to the president. He's going to win... and he's going to win big. You pollsters have no idea what you're doing"
There's a difference between understanding that the Trump admin probably knew about this, and saying "I know exactly what it is they're doing!!!". You can't conflate the two and say to question OP is to question whether or not Trump knew anything or had/has a plan.
Hahahah "he's proving how much of a larper I am, quick, call him a faggot!!" Love the brain power, hoss.
To say it's a presumption there's a chess game shows you know very little about politics, let alone in an election year.
Wow, that sure is a long winded way of saying "well I know people are trying to win, but I have no evidence to support jack shit that I said".
during a time when some people are losing hope or feeling bleak, theories like this are not a negative thing.
Firstly you didn't present it as a theory but a fact. Second, people don't need your night night stories for hope, jackass. We're adults, not children. Act like it.
Provide evidence for your statements, or stfu and sit down.
Claiming to know it's a chess move at all and proclaiming "it's a trap! how Trump set up a honey pot for the 2020 elections" is a larp. You have no basis in reality for this. You've moved the goal posts and you're assuming you're right (you're not), so the discussion isn't an evaluation of a chess game, it's presuming there's a chess game at all, pretending you know what that game is about (based on pretending you know), and then analysing it. A larp.
Sit down, you aren't equipped to win an argument about this.
I'm not the guy your responding to, but I'm pretty sure everyone knows what larp means. Except maybe you, that is. You have no sources for any of this but are claiming that almost losing the election by purposefully allowing fraud is some 6D chess move. Again with no sources for your claims. That is role playing. And you're trying to sound like Q asking yourself a bunch of questions you just instantly answer. Cringe.
Key phrases being "take this with a grain of salt" and "secret watermarks". The watermarks your referring to are not secret.