Good question. Not that I can find. I just started the screenshot yesterday to track the trend. Ya know, something journalists used to do but I’ll do their job too, at least for myself. I’m smart enough to do two jobs and to do it better than them anyway
The IHME, the model, in just their latest update this morning reduced the amount of beds projected we will need by 46.3%
They reduced the amount of ICU beds we will need by 26.5%
They reduced the amount of ventelators we will need by 21.9%
They reduced the number of projected deaths by 12.6%
Yes, light.
Honestly I’m thinking it’s going to be 20,000-30,000 but even if you add a 0 to that, it’s still a FUCKING JOKE.
I work in healthcare, people have died in my arms, RIP to everyone for real for real, but come the fuck on
It’s an ongoing clinical trial, it will never end. But the special designation of Compassionate Use allows doctors to both use the drug in real-time and allows the FDA to collect the data as if all of the public was enrolled in a trial.
So the question is how much data do we have so far and can meaningful conclusions be drawn. I reckon the answer is no because it takes weeks to follow up these patients to see if the drug actually worked and if the drug had any unforeseen consequences. Time.
I haven’t clicked on much these days, but are you telling me that current projections now are 100,000 in the US? Like - this is mainstream (normie) info?
This is such a joke. I was told millions by all my TDS friends just days ago
I’m with you. However this is a whole new ballgame. The situation is 1) worldwide and 2) currently in a position to ruin civilization. So he’s playing chicken in a sense ...Mueller/impeachment was a no brainer, to wait it out, especially when you’re squeaky clean. This...we only get out of this with a leader. Trump will lead some of us to victory, however a huge swath of civilization will not and I’m not sure what that looks like post-WuFlu
I’m with you but the whole reason we’re doing this is, is that on average, taking into account the severity of the side-effects and how contagious it is, our healthcare system would be overrun with the influx of new patients.
Are the models wrong? That’s another conversation. Is the cure worse than the disease itself? Again, not arguing you.
From a practical point of view, I agree with your mom’s MO but unfortunately would be antithetical to the mitigation efforts and will not be entertained seriously. Perhaps there’s a place for it in a controlled method, whereby folks get cleared to participate in that activity (because on average they would not be high risk for hospitalization), but that’s too logical for our emotional society