Too. Fucking. Late.

You're really enjoying the show!

You don't want to go repeating it. It makes you sound like a twat.

It's practically-sized, but is it water-proof?

cuckoo!

Big 'nope'.

And, the next time an alien tells you we're not ready, tell it to go fuck itself.

Patronizing cunts.

You're talking about that stuff.

You know. The thing!

Paper!

'Search' isn't working.

I'll go post it. In 'New'.

Again.

Quicker to type, 'I, also trust the plan'!

Quicker to type, 'Trust the plan'!

I get rejected images, when a screen-grab is a .PNG over 1Mb. I have to export as .jpg, to upload.

When you want to be taken seriously, but have a ridiculous argument, humour doesn't help.

Been using it, forever!

Dark mode, in all things!

I don't think he'll be offered a deal.

That won't help the election result!

And this isn't a criminal case!

You're an idiot. I'm done.

You are free, to underestimate your enemy.

No.

It wouldn't.

And you are assuming that they are idiots. Notwithstanding that they've brought the US to its knees, and gotten away with stealing billions, murder, and so on.

I leave you to your opinion.

So.. to make this evidence of fraud, all we have to do is disprove these three possibilities.

Let's get to work!

You get started, I'll catch you up.

The boxes, to me, represent a broken chain of custody, and cast sufficient doubt on the validity of the ballot for the legislature to act.

It's not the machine, it's the ballots.

We should criticise the properties of paper, now.

If they are going to leave log files lying about, then they want to get caught!

I don't think they want to get caught.

I'm not struggling to say it - the video evidence of ruby has a valid explanation, according to our witness!

Not the suitcase stuff, just the re-run.

Do you even understand that re-run fraud comes down to whether ruby pressed one button or another, before putting them back in?

Can you make that distinction from the video?

If not, stop pushing it as evidence of fraud!

I wouldn't work for them but, if that was your evidence, I could cast doubt on it, using your witness.

Make your best case. That is all.

It doesn't do anything!

Code is data, sure. But, this is data. Any modern language can consume this data.

It could be a tally, wherein biden got 1036 ballots. Perhaps jorgannsen got 11 provisional votes, and the office code is prefixed?

To my eyes, there is nothing to suggest a numerical operation takes place here.

Then, you should spare people from listening to him. They don't have your discernment.