That was a really good game.

That is a really good idea.

He's certainly 'prompted' to make a big response by the rise of Marie Le Pen, and what they used to call the far-right.

I realise, now, that the far-right was never 'far', at all. Just right.

Dr. Turley and I appreciate the problem, reaction and solution, better than you.

It's bigger than re-election. Even you should see that by now. In the least, you must see that part of this is about the constitution, so it's about freedom. Not only in the US - this is bigger than that.

I think that anybody who posts, 'what trump should do', is a moron, but I wouldn't ban them. Let the morons speak!

A bee, a da bee.. that's national guard, folks!

OP exposed as a moron!

Let's not ban 'im.

They were trying to give the impression that the dimmocrats had held their HRC following, with gains elsewhere.

The massive trump turn-out, meant that they had to cheat to a ridiculous degree.

?

And Tucker's a real motherf**er! A few hours before seeing this, I had just decided that carlson might be our man, trapped behind enemy lines, but still reporting.

Is it odd that she doesn't wear her wedding ring?

As well they might!

The cabal are gonna have to up their game, to try and stop what is coming.

Cos, they were looking really good, before.

I think taiwan was a part of china. You are mistaken.

Say it ain't so!

His campaign ad was very slick and, sometimes funny. Still, I never trust a guy with one eye.

Apart from Columbo.

One more question! What are 'red-flag' laws?

I heard about 53 appointments. Never heard at what level (maybe district-court), and I've never heard of the implications of it.

But, by everything else the prez has done, they should really come into play, at some point.

That point hasn't occured, so far, or been mooted.

At what age does leopard-print become a 'go-to'?

The mirror-image of Mickey's signature reads, 'Wicked'!

I gave you a ten - you owe me 8 bucks!

I married her.

Don't be like me.

The calmest path is to look to SCOTUS on or after December 14th.

There will be shock and revelations before that, but making the case to SCOTUS is where it's at.

Like Georgia (I think) where they have effectively changed the end-time for voting - SCOTUS will have to tell them that the change made many ballots invalid. They simply won't accept it, at state level.

Like Arizona (I think) where they say they will await settlement of all legal issues, prior to certification. They've effectively avoided (further) crimes of invalid certification, and kicked the problem 'upstairs'.

SCOTUS is upstairs!

He's just some cunt, with greasy hair.

That's, like, 3 jokes in 1.

Molyneux's asshoe.

Now I imagine it, I see the driver's leg emerge, wearing cowboy boots.

Doubt it.