Sure. I just don't get why that would require big tech.

To be fair, I've hardly been a gamer since Unreal Tournament '97! I moved into board games, somewhat.

Board games, with smart app interaction - now there's potential.

That would be big, but I just don't see the necessity.

Unless doing so would, somehow, enable a 3rd term.

"Von!"

"Von, dead voter-ballot!"

I don't know what the last bit meant but, good for you!

Is the ruleset like a gaming engine? Like Unity or something?

I can perfectly believe that.

I've heard that they turning on RPG diehards. Questioning their 'inclusivity'.

The diehards won't stand a chance.

That'll be the oval office.

Is that Allan Omar?!

This is so many kinds of wrong!

You just made the list!

True.

The whole thing is actually epic! Whoever wins, the other side instantly loses.

It literally is all or nothing, for all of us.

I'm still laughing at this!

This judge so needs to be relevent.

Not that I know of.

Thought it was just me! I had to rewind, to be sure.

TBH, I'm not convinced that she was born a girl. There are some bikini shots on this site, that show she has implants, which is odd for a woman with a (still) very small chest.

I'm gonna have to accept your answer as official.

I'm a badass digital soldier!

Is that a mike obama joke?!

They want him to go along with the delusion. The alternative, is that he plays the role of vlillain, in that same delusion.

He's never wrong!

All headlines are 'click-baity'!

He knows how to sell his message, and always underlies it with some solid principle or analysis. As others have attested, Dr Turley is, sometimes, the only hopeful, rational voice in all of this.

So, he has focus, and he is prepared to take his message to town, as he went on the road during the election.

He's solid, and I fully expect to, someday, see a photo of Turley and prez Trump together!

Because he's better than you?

I think it's to avoid breaking insurrection laws.

MSM audience won't pick up on it, and the left will pretend it means the same thing.

Put thedonald.win alongside your search phrase, in DDG.

He never bragged about breaking the law!

He bragged about withholding money, in the form of aid, from the Ukraine unless they did as he required - sack the prosecutor that was investigating corruption and Burisma.

The aid isn't given on the basis of political favour. He just used it that way.

Where was it before?

Amen!

But, is that law, or constitution?

If it is law, and the law is changed, you could be looking at a 3rd term!

You could be looking at, GEOTUS!

I don't understand the implications of that, unless it's just like the US system and, I guess, you have a federal body too?

Aussie states, or the US?