They'll never know what they're missing!

My upload got 4 karma points.

I can't post klaus schwab - what could it all mean?

He can never look at those boots in the same way, ever again.

Poor bastard.

Simosen!

It might depend what part of the planet you occupy.

I had some old 'silver' spoons but, the jeweller wasn't interested!

It was hallmarked, and everything but, no!

S'not enough - I'm off to bitchute.

You asking me, or telling?

You know that, with youtube, you can create an account, and it'll 'member your favourite channels, and let you know what's trending?

I mean, it does everything!

Smart.

India?

We're not doing this on a factual basis, then?

I mean, they only want the IT jobs!

At least, that way, your 'effing voting systems would work only as intended.

Did he make those dapper boots, seriously?

S'wrong with youtube?

That way, lies oblivion.

They bury their heads in the sand but, I've just been checking - they don't!

I thought it might be a copium, for those offf the hopium - it isn't!

TBH, you sound like you follow the news.

I think that the ostrich has the right idea.

Oh, there will be an election!

More than one name on the ballot, I can't say for sure but, even putin holds elections.

You have little to fear.

So long as you do as you are told!

Now, get some sleep.

America first, might have avoided all this but, putting america first was never the requirement.

Just open-source the entire thing - throw more light on the problem, as the fraudsters hide in the shadows.

I'm not arguing - not at these rates!

I'm saying that, as sophistication grows, trust diminishes.

I could deliver a secure system, for half the price, and that's bona-fide. Non-citizens, dead voters, maiden-name voting, oversees, all considered.

But I don't get invited to those meetings, and I don't specify the systems, and I don't get told the real requirement, just how it should present.

Secure voting, isn't what they ordered - they got what they ordered and now, we must all live by it!

Now, what will the pigeons shit on?

I am, with a laser-sight!

Like, keep your eye on the lady - the rest is smoke and mirrors.

TBH - the way you don't answer a straight question, straight - you have to be a politician.

Or greek, and I don't trust either.

Redundancy in voting?

All of this stuff is your bag - carry it yourself!

I shouldn't be rude. I should say that I don't have to trust any of this, and can write it off as eye-glazing details.

Further, I think I could get enough support to support the idea of manual voting, or some crypto solution, removing the need to trust in black-boxes on many levels.

We could pay for such a system with the savings of not spending hundreds of millions on systems that run Windows 2000 (SP 2). Systems that don't have wifi, but do. Systems that cost millions but, can be undermined by a $1 memory stick.

But, don't leave it up to me - I would see all of these clever people, hung, and publicly.

It cuts through the eye-glazing small-talk, and restores trust, all round.

Props to the artist - I'm seeing some great work here, in the last few minutes.

Always favourite.

The SS might come-a-killin' but, goddammit - you gotta admire the cut of that suit!

Now, get on the train!

That entire 'republic' argument, simply passed you by, didn't it?

Man, your job is dull! No wonder you're into muslim porn, eh?!

Which bit is meant to change my mind?

It would've suited me just to hear a valid reason for fractional vote counting, in a voting system of such vast expense.

Cos, as I skim-read all of that, I know that they did use it, despite what they might tell you not to use.

Occurs to me that they did use every means to cheat, in addition to fractional voting.

What do I know? I don't get paid stupid money to develop stupid systems to repress the will of the people.

No. That requires somebody far more 'flexible' than than I might ever be.