gab.com DNS record removed
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p5bi4gl1g9zk68q/AADE0xZgkSp1osgOQ6GcZK5ha?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/9eauo0exakatbqy/AADNLgX1eLrmeh6tqOSNH7bwa?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/musnsxbdxs2ik6d/AABuvTtfG6kZrOVHw1fYVX1Ca?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/v37m5p4k0nyzwga/ADJ%20Short%20Demo%20v1.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dominionvoting.com/training/index.html
Found here https://files7.philadelphiavotes.com/announcements/Dominion_-_Redacted.pdf
Hey
I have some satoshis lying around ... which voter fraud defense fund can I support financially with bitcoin?
I do not donate to charities as 99% are total scam (like unicef) but I am very happy to support good cause. So far I have found WikiLeaks and couragefound.org (recommended by WikiLeaks) worth donating too.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwCp-KNHvzbNPjgtuiKYnJg/featured
They are already removing the streams from the recounts - Camera 5 already removed, unfortunatelly I don't have a full grab, only first 6 hours.
At the moment President Trump is officially winning the election by a big margin:
Trump 63:Biden 35 (out of 35, 16 (GA) is legally challenged)
Let's have a look at countries that certified the election results and compare to Edison/NYT data feed:
North Dakota:
https://results.sos.nd.gov/ResultsSW.aspx?text=All&type=SW&map=CTY
Official results: Trump 235,595 | Biden 114,902 | Total Votes: 361,819
Last Update: 11/12/2020 3:08:14 PM
NYT data feed last recored before certification: Trump 65.1% (± 235618) | Biden 31.8% (± 115187) | Total Votes: 361656 | accuracy (0.1%) = 361
NYT data feed at the time: Trump 65.1% (± 235717) | Biden 31.8% (± 115235) | Total Votes: 361808 | accuracy (0.1%) = 361
NYT data feed now: Trump 65.1% (± 235725) | Biden 31.8% (± 115239) | Total Votes: 361819 | accuracy (0.1%) = 361
Louisiana:
https://voterportal.sos.la.gov/static/2020-11-03/resultsRace/Presidential
Official results: Trump 1,255,776 (58.46%) | Biden 856,034 (39.85%) | Total Votes: 2148062
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 58.5% (± 1257546) | Biden 39.8% (± 855905) | Total Votes: 2147817 | accuracy (0.1%) = 2147
NYT data feed now: Trump 58.5% (± 1257690) | Biden 39.9% (± 858150) | Total Votes: 2148062 | accuracy (0.1%) = 2148
Hawaii:
https://elections.hawaii.gov/wp-content/results/histatewide.pdf
Official results: Trump 196,864 (34.0%) | Biden 366,130 (63.1%) | Total Votes: 574469
Last Update: 11/19/2020 at 10:21:05
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 34.3% (± 197286) | Biden 63.7% (± 366142) | Total Votes: 574341 | accuracy (0.1%) = 574
NYT data feed now: Trump 34.3% (± 197330) | Biden 63.7% (± 366223) | Total Votes: 574469 | accuracy (0.1%) = 574
Florida:
https://floridaelectionwatch.gov/FederalOffices/President
Official results: Trump 5,668,731 | Biden 5,297,045 | Total Votes: 11,067,456
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 51.2% (± 5672079) | Biden 47.9% (± 5306853) | Total Votes: 11067473 | accuracy (0.1%) = 11067
NYT data feed now: Trump 51.2% (± 5672071) | Biden 47.9% (± 5306845) | Total Votes: 11067456 | accuracy (0.1%) = 11067
Delaware:
https://elections.delaware.gov/results/html/index.shtml?electionId=GE2020
Official results: Trump 200603 (39.8%) | Biden 296268 (58.78%)
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 39.8% (± 200203) | Biden 58.8% (± 295657) | Total Votes: 502392 | accuracy (0.1%) = 502
NYT data feed now: Trump 39.8% (± 200847) | Biden 58.8% (± 296609) | Total Votes: 504010 | accuracy (0.1%) = 504
Wyoming:
Official results: Trump 193 559 | Biden 73 491 | Total Votes 276 765
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 70.0% (± 193815) | Biden 26.6% (± 73735) | Total Votes: 276681 | accuracy (0.1%) = 276
NYT data feed now: Trump 69.9% (± 193597) | Biden 26.6% (± 73757) | Total Votes: 276765 | accuracy (0.1%) = 276
Vermont:
https://sos.vermont.gov/media/heqnbco5/generalofficialresults.pdf
Official results: Trump 112 704 | Biden 242 820
NYT data feed now: Trump 30.7% (± 112984) | Biden 66.1% (± 243053) | Total Votes: 367428 | accuracy (0.1%) = 367
South Dakota:
https://sdsos.gov/elections-voting/assets/2020GeneralStateCanvassFinal&Certificate.pdf
Official results: Trump 261 043 | Biden 150 471
Last update: November 10
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 61.8% (± 261426) | Biden 35.6% (± 150684) | Total Votes: 422678 | accuracy (0.1%) = 422
NYT data feed now: Trump 61.8% (± 261383) | Biden 35.6% (± 150660) | Total Votes: 422609 | accuracy (0.1%) = 422
South Carolina:
https://www.enr-scvotes.org/SC/106502/Web02-state.264691/#/?undefined
Official results: Trump 1,385,103 (55.11%) | Biden 1,091,541 (43.43%)
Last update: 11/13/2020 2:18:24 PM EST
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 55.1% (± 1386100) | Biden 43.4% (± 1092041) | Total Votes: 2513329 | accuracy (0.1%) = 2513
NYT data feed now: Trump 55.1% (± 1386100) | Biden 43.4% (± 1092041) | Total Votes: 2513329 | accuracy (0.1%) = 2513
Oklahoma:
https://results.okelections.us/OKER/?elecDate=20201103
Official results: Trump 1,020,280 (65.37%) | Biden 503,890 (32.29%)
Last Update: 11/06/2020 06:33:42 PM
NYT data feed before certification: Trump 65.4% (± 1020121) | Biden 32.3% (± 504215) | Total Votes: 1558627 | accuracy (0.1%) = 1558
NYT date feed now: Trump 65.4% (± 1021477) | Biden 32.3% (± 504886) | Total Votes: 1560699 | accuracy (0.1%) = 1560
PA Supreme Court does not question the evidence provided (hey shills saying it's just a hearsay!).
OPINION EXCERPTS
"Pursuant to the Election Code, designated observers for campaigns or candidates were permitted to physically enter the Convention Center hall and observe the entirety of this process;however, the Board erected a waist-high security fence to separate the observers from the above-described workspace of Board employees. The fence, behind which observers could freely move, was separated from the first row of employees’ desks in each section by a distance of approximately 15-18feet. Id.at 23. Board employees used this “buffer” area between the security fence and their workspace to enter or leavetheir work areasfor their shifts,or to take scheduled breaks. Id.at 30-31."
"He testified that he was able to move freely along the length of the security fence and observe the employees engaged in their pre-canvassingand canvassing activities from various vantage points. He related that,while he could see the Board employees in the first section of the workspace examining the back of the ballot return envelopes, from his position,he could not read the actual declarations on the ballot envelopes"
"The court (referring to trial court) opined that, under this section, “[w]atchers are not directed to audit ballots or to verify signatures, to verify voter address[es], or to do anything else that would require a watcher to see the writing or markings on the outside of either envelope, including challenging the ballots or ballot signatures.”
"In sum, we conclude the Board did not act contrary to law in fashioning its regulations governing the positioning of candidate representatives during the pre-canvassing and canvassing process, as the Election Code does not specify minimum distance parameters for the location of such representatives. Critically, we find the Board’s regulations as applied herein were reasonable in that they allowed candidate representatives to observe the Board conducting its activities as prescribed under the Election Code"
Ruling is 100% partisan 5 dems - 2 reps.
DISSENTING OPINION EXCERPTS
"Under the Commonwealth Court’s order, these representatives could then observe whether ballots were being counted lawfully to the best of their ability, consistent with health and safety restrictions. The record -- as well as publicly-available video recordings from the Convention Center -- amply demonstrate that this simply wasn’t the case previously. The canvassing has now proceeded to near conclusion under an ensuing agreement among the parties associated with federal litigation. In my judgment, the matter is therefore moot - or at least moot enough - so that this Court’s discretionary -- intervention was and is not required"
I think the SCOTUS will not rule on this one for the same reason - they will consider the matter moot because the (pre-)canvassing will be completly finished then.
The evidence is strong and not questioned. PA Supreme Court justices must know their opinion is nonsense but they are simply afraid to break The Party line (just like in any other communist country, yes), they really argue that "the law says the candidate's representative must be in the same room, it does not mention they can't be in a hall behind a bar 15 feet+ from the tables"
Step 1) Go to https://www.dominionvoting.com/ and see the first "fact check"
Edison Research (ER) has refuted any claims that company data suggests any voting irregularities, including vote switching. ER President Larry Rosin told The Dispatch Fact Check, "Edison Research created no such report and we are not aware of any voter fraud." Claims that 941,000 votes for President Trump in Pennsylvania were deleted are impossible.
Step 2) Give your geek friend this line of code (GNU/Linux or OS X, Windows do not come with python3, perhaps someone can do a Windows version):
python3 -c "state = 'pennsylvania'; import functools; import requests; x = requests.get(f'https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/{state}/president.json').json()['data']['races'][0]['timeseries']; print('Votes lost: %d' % sum([item['votes'] - x[i-1]['votes'] for i, item in enumerate(x[1:],1) if item['votes'] - x[i-1]['votes'] < 0]))"
Votes lost: -941248
This code fetches NYT data which are exactly the same data (Edison Research) they are talking about :).
Please also note that the "fact check" changed the claim to 941000 votes for Donald J. Trump were deleted while in reality 941 000 votes in total were deleted (based on the published NYT data feed we can't see exactly how many votes for which candidate - they express the votes for each candidate as fraction of total votes.)
I am looking into archiving today Alaska counting while it's in progress.
The analysis that documented the fraud switches and votes lost is based on New York Times (Edison?) API for Nov 3. Do they have an API like that for today as well?
In case they take down archive.is/vn. Here is a script (linux/unix) I use to make local copies:
#!/bin/bash
COOKIE=""
cd /home/airgag/archive
wget -E -H -k -p \
--header 'User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/82.0' \
--header 'Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8' \
--header 'Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5' \
--header 'DNT: 1' \
--header 'Connection: keep-alive' \
--header "Cookie: $COOKIE" \
--header 'Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1' \
--header 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
--header 'Pragma: no-cache' \
"$URL"
Open archive.is in your browser, open developer console and copy out the cookie and fill in COOKIE
then run_this_script.sh <archive_is_url>
