That's perfectly understandable in terms of math, but I don't see WHY they'd count this way. Originally the number is just a sum, so instead of getting the sum of votes into a percentage, and then using a rounded percentage to calculate approximate votes, why not just keep using the original number when it is already there?
2nd question: is this rounding just used with regard to News reporting and only relevant there, or did they get this number from some type of output at vote counting areas?
I don't know but it gives me an excuse to post this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJEBgjQIekE&ab_channel=Headass
I kind of think they're entertaining. Got a kick out of the Ricky Gervais golden globes. It's also strangely fun to hear critics rip woke movies, even when I don't watch any new films (except Ford vs. Ferrari, and it was on a plane). Oh the thread said "give a tiny fuck about what they're saying"... right, in that case, I don't give a tiny fuck.
I'm not knowledgeable about Q but... What is to stop some people faking Q identity or membership and sending disinformation? Secondly, what is the point and value of Q? I like that it generated some enthusiasm and love how vocally anti-pedophile they are. But how does tellilng people shit like "Trust the plan" translate into any win? It sounds like subversion. A while ago I made a thread where Robert Barnes was talking about signature verification and it got derailed, definitely intentionally, by a spamming Q poster. This made my suspicions grow a little bit more, as Barnes was saying in the referenced podcast that Q was a disinformation campaign hurting the cause (though I had not mentioned it in my post and was only talking about signature verification).
To simplify: 1) Can someone fake Q messages without being caught and spread disinformation that hurts us? 2) Did someone do it? If 1) is Yes, in our world, 2) must be Yes also.
Agreed. We have 73 million, minimum, and likely the majority of citizens. We can throw our weight around. If they want to kick us off, or support politics that are actively against us, we have enough power to make our own platform and cut their value off. Supporting local community businesses is a great thing.
How bad would it be to use an alternative that uses an Amazon / EBay framework where users handle deliveries on their own. That's what it used to be for everything and it is mostly OK. It's convenient that Amazon can get stuff pretty fast, but if you plan ahead it's not that hard for me to get the same results.
A lot of the Amazon sellers also have their own webpages where you can order directly. Any other alternatives yet? If not, we can build...
To the OP question: because there is no alleged crime. It unspecifically points to Obama as the most influential asshole of the Democrats that undermined Trump, but that's not court material. Shadow government is an apparent editorialization of blame for who is responsible for most anti-Trump scandals. I don't think it should be taken literally because it appears Rush was retorting to accusations of him and Trump having a future shadow government, but he's not definitively endorsing this in an exact way, but pointing that the Dem/Obama actions are ironically similar to this accusation. Some of which were started before Obama left office, making it the normal government. In essence, this does not appear to indicate anything worse than what we already had. That Obama was involved with Deep State activities against the GEOTUS.
As a preface though, what we already knew about Obamagate was substantial enough for criminal charges, but I still doubt they can make a case for treason. Anyways, the fact that they were carrying it out after he left office, and that Obama liked this, does not indicate any further activity or a "government". I may be missing something, but this is apparently just a rewording of "deep state" which sounds worse but has no difference in a legal context from the corruption we've been observing during Trump's first term.
Not sure what the Fake News Network meant by a Trump shadow government. I'm sure they'd find it illegal if Trump did a quarter of what the previous admin did to undermine another administration, but perhaps they mean that he will not transfer power, which is how they'd describe Trump not acknowledging a fake election result. May be trying to gaslight us that if Trump succeeds legally and gets the 270 electors or gets through on the House vote that Trump being in power is a shadow government, while Biden's shadow government is the real one.
How will corporations like the NFL recover from shattered revenue and cut player salaries, drop in franchise sales prices...? I have a feeling they'll start to try to get tax payers on the hook to pay for arena upgrades that boost the asset valuations, or maybe even get on a federal assitance program for their SJWness activism.
Evaluation of this depends on if the count at that point was, say, all the Republican-heavy precincts and only heavy Dem ones remained. That seems possible in California, but VA? Gotta be highly unlikely. Can you offer some insight into the way the counties counted to that point usually swing?
A side story of the fraud is finding that many Americans think counting is complicated. They're unable to count by themselves, and implicit in their reactions to the voting machine scandal is the idea that they think a complex counting algorithm is needed to do sums in steps of +1. Or everyone pretending to have trouble with these concepts is intentionally lying... I feel it is a mix of both.
I'm confusion. How does an error like this come about? By itself, there is no justification for a 500 vote swing on 4k or 100k votes. Does it accumulate in the running sum?
As you said, a 500 vote rounding error is huge. In small precincts and house races, this would represent a dramatic change. As the other pede said, I can't see a reason why we need to implement rounding at any stage here. The numbers are neither big or complex enough to necessitate rounding.
The fallout from that seems to be proof of fraud, one way or another.
I really hope not because the impact of severe sentences for these things is not only important but ... very important! It will scare people from daring to do this again.
Surely some of them won't be able to get out with such simple excuses, if this is pursued thoroughly enough. If so, catching some worker with fraud and a stiff penalty will open the possibility that they rat out others for a reduced sentence.
We should have organization prepared for the unfortunate event. I expect 2 things with high probability. Trump officially wins and the left doesn't acknowledge it and says it is a coup and tries violence and intimidation.
I'm not sure if Trump wins by ballot inspection and using legal vote counts to decide the electoral votes, or if it is not going to be inspected in a clean and official way, and electors are persuaded to vote Trump after demonstrating solid evidence of fraud, yet being unable to correct the exact count and just deciding to go for Trump. In the latter case, I expect the left to threaten massive violence and something like a civil war. First to try to pressure electors not to go against them, and secondly to pursue it if feasible.
Since right wingers own most of the guns, the main concerns in a large scale conflict are things like resource lines and control of key positions in military. Not sure if any pedes can offer perspectives on the likely scenarios we face on those fronts?
I saw Seb Gorka playing a clip from Laura Ingraham's show where she said: 1) there are massive scandalous probs with the election we need to uncover; 2) this won't be "enough" votes to "overturn" the election. 3) I'd be lying to you if I said there was a good chance.
She's a gaslighter who must have bought into whatever her producers told her and is not an independent thinker, but, IMO...What a total liar, she's not dumb enough to believe that. This is simple fucking math and understanding of the legal rules.
If you call into question even one of the red-flag vote dumps which were hundreds of thousands for Biden after observers were expelled and they were 99.4% Biden, that alone is enough of a difference to switch the election.
People already showed if mail-in ballot rejection rates were similar to past elections, Trump wins handily. And this is something that can be verified and changed according to the law, because this WAS the law according to the real state authorities, the legislatures.
Even if you couldn't determine the exact fraudulent ballots or their number, Trump even has the option of convincing the legislature to use electors for him, if the security of the process had enough doubt (particularly if the reason for lack of verification came from the opposing party). It's fallacious to say we need an exact number, if you're paying attention. But we can get sufficient numbers either way. Just using Laura's behavior as an example, but to see someone who seemed red pilled go this route indicates a strong propaganda push at Fox. tl;dr can confirm they are dead. They will soon be a worthless asset appealing to the 100 Jeb Bush voters.
I wouldn't say the media killed 250k because that's still using their deranged counting system. The real number is closer to the 2020 excess mortality compared to 2019, adjusted for change in population size and risk. However, that would also include increases in mortality due to less access for other medical treatments, suicides, etc. So the best comparators might be Florida and Montana, who I assume did not do anything to induce mortality in other areas.