What city are you saying is wrong?

Barr confuses me. When he's taken action and spoken, he seems to knock it out of the park. He casually obliterates Democrats who demonized him, like no other I've seen. Inexplicably, this is overshadowed by his inaction, especially at times of need. He even spoke about how risky mail-in ballots were going to be. How is it he seems inactive and unprepared now?

I remember him complaining about insubordination at the DoJ by leftists prosecutors. I can imagine that's true, but I can't understand his reasoning not to assert himself and fire anyone that is subverting him after such a long time. I am guessing he's not deliberately against us, but he seems to traditional in some capacities, and unable to go scorched earth when needed. Or maybe he really isn't on board. Are there no congressmen or people on our team calling him to action publicly??

We won't concede jackshit, ever, unless you recount the ballots and prove the purported result. That's cuz we play by the rules, but doing so is going to result in a Donald win, get fucked doomers. Multiple paths to legit return to the Presidency.

Goes without saying but if this roadblock starts going on, post it on TDW. I think a lot of us will come to tristate vicinities. Worth taking the day off work over.

Meanwhile, Barr is riffing on the bagpipes, I guess. If the FBI or other Federal enforcement does not act on this naked terrorist threat... The conclusion is obvious.

Meanwhile, I just happened to be in need of getting a new vehicle. Can anyone recommend a good commie plower?

Good thinking. If this doesn't work well, we can make our own lists. Maybe later our own app. At the same time, that type of infrastructure further strengthens our ability to say FU to leftists cancel culture NPCs and their corporate hostages.

+100

If it is cross state there is federal jurisdiction. Barr needs to get off his ass.

Agreed, and much love to Powell for fighting Flynn and fighting here. At the same time, another pro-Trump lawyer raised points that suggest some of her strategy is not ideal for legal strategies in this crunch time -- see my user name posts for some recent links. The reasons are 2 fold, IIRC.

1. The Venezuela and smartmatic / dominion link seems to be not entirely solid. In terms of making a legal case of a grand conspiracy. It is also alleged some people are deliberately giving Powell misinformation to sidetrack her on this front.
2. It was the other lawyer's opinion that anything not rock solid is going to hurt the case. To win in the larger and less solid claims would need a drawn out legal process, anyway. The other alleged reason is that a Judge only needs to attack the weakest and more uncertain claims in an effort to dismiss all claims, which is not fair, but probably will happen.
3. As a sidenote, the lawyer here (Barnes) thinks requesting signature verification is the most solid strategy. There is much legal precedent that Judges are comfortable in throwing out ballots failing scrutiny of signatures. We'd find mismatch of signatures if any of the fraud allegations are true.

Altogether, for PR purposes Trump probably needs to avoid being tied to the PR of a failed conspiracy claim. The PR battle will have a big impact when it comes to influencing the decision of Judges and Legislatures.

In both cases, the first step necessary to ultimately proving is forensic examination of ballots. Get a batch and see what the voting record, dominion or not, said, and then check if they were obviously fraudulent with signatures. That will prevail in court. Afterwards you can have a huge investigation into WHY a massive amount of this occurred.

The weird thing about this Q poster (going by his other posts) is that Robert Barnes was making a significant argument about how Q hurts the cause (making disprovable theories that are too far, and telling people "it's all part of the plan"). Then a Q guy comes to this legal strategy thread and starts posting distracting nonsense.

Not really sold on Powell or Wood here. I'm glad they're making an effort, but I don't think they made the best or most effective legal arguments, and other lawyers on our side argue they hurt the case legally. The very extreme allegations make it easy for a Judge to get away with attacking the weakest argument and dismissing the entire situation. Reference here- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYJUjkpjZbo&ab_channel=VivaFrei

This is good information in the long term game, but I doubt this helps current legal cases. If we verify signatures, we will find where this happened, and give a very concrete and indisputable legal case. There is legal precedent for signature verifications, too. Something about Eric Coomer can be denied and dragged out for months, we need to get to the evidence that shows something really happened.

Nothing to do with the topic! Demand signature audit, find the fraud from all avenues there, and win the election. No distractions or Q stuff, please!

main point: signature matching covers a lot of the fraud links by itself. Only need 1% in GA and under 3% in PA to win. A margin much less than the normal signature rejection rate.

A good interview question would have been: "we prepared an affadavit for you, to help, would you repeat these questions in a sworn, legally binding manner?" But going on Fox, he probably had a pre-agreement on what he was going to discuss.

can you explain this a bit? I was thinking just in terms of files. As a off-the-shelf laptop, won't file edits be traceable? In that case, if they change a folder or alter anything after the initial count, it should be shown on the file change log. Not sure how traffic logs on a normal WIN10 machine will help either, but that seems plausible too. Soo, I don't know what the audit log here means, but maybe if it is changed at a late date, it indicates fraud and should be thrown out, barring some amazing excuse.

lol, gif that someone

Yeah, feeling nostalgic and a bit shocked to watch real investigative journalism.

PA is such a joke. I didn't notice the significance of the theft with regard to the theft being specific to the ENTIRE ELECTION system. Then went on to use it as if everything was OK, without just going to the trouble of purchasing a new laptop? And they have no rules against using the internet, and allow workers to browse online, in such a simple device that is proven to be hackable?

For the second point, can the Trump legal team obtain the laptops and see whether or not they have such activity records?

They're saying they can get Admin access to the tabulation machine, which is just a WIN10 machine. If there is manipulation at that point, is it possible to look at machine change logs? Codemonkey was then saying the flash drive is used to transfer from the tabulator, but it seems uncertain if any manipulation of the flash drive would be detected and whether alterations are traceable.

Perfect timing, watching

great job, and loved the compilation of the self-defense fighting at the end

I thought this is a recount, not an audit. I.e., no signature match, no checking of proper registration and addresses, or general flagging of suspicious ballots that will be separately scrutinized?