I'll accept that too! Justice takes many forms. =)
I prefer prison for them, but that's just me.
You didn't even watch the Crowder video (I know because I'm still re-watching it and it's an hour long). So please don't pretend you did. I will break it down very simply. When a woman is pregnant the baby has body parts including a head (and sometimes a penis). Does that woman now have 2 heads and a penis? If she doesn't have 2 heads and a penis, those body parts belong to someone else and not the woman (if you'd have watched Crowder's video you would have see him explain this very thing). Therefor it follows, that if those body parts do not belong to the woman, they are the baby's and it it thus distinct from the mother-so not her body. It's very simple and logical. She doesn't have the right to murder her baby who is NOT a part of her body. "They are not people" is exactly the phase used to commit genocide. Congratulations, you are using the very same "logic" as genocidal maniacs. That is how abortion relates to genocide. You believe that abortion up to birth is perfectly fine. Why not just say that up front instead of hemming and hawing about, well it's the mother's choice and I don't have a say, and I may not agree. According to you the birth canal confers magical status of "person hood". So a person is only a person based on location, because that same baby is only a human being outside of the womb and 5 minutes before, they're "a clump of cells". If you can't even acknowledge basic facts (like the baby has it's own head and other body parts) I'm going to conclude you don't want to argue in good faith, so there is no point in further discussion. Have a good a good day.
You aren't logically consistent and are ignoring my point about 2 heads etc. because you can't refute it. Either she has 2 heads, or the other head belongs to someone else, there is no middle ground. You are copping out by saying, "well, I don't agree with it, maybe it's murder, but it isn't my place to say, but it's OK up to a point I won't define." If murder is wrong, it is always wrong. There is no equivocating it. You are using the same language as those who have genocided people. That is my point. You also could argue (as I do) that abortion is a genocide. We all are imposing our beliefs on society by saying, "you don't have the right to steal from other people, you don't have the right to murder people. Abortion is murder- therefor you don't have the right to murder an unborn baby. It's no different. Maybe this will help you see how morally wrong it is. It's short. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZXQBhTszpU There's also this- it's Crowder's change my mind. All of your arguments have been used before. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nhXQS5UUGQ
My point is the phrase saying "it's not a person" (your wording) is the exact argument used to justify genocide. I'm not sure how much more clearly I can state that. Abortion is genocide. It isn't her body. You didn't refute anything I said about her having 2 heads, 4 legs, 2 hearts, etc. Are you claiming she does have those? If not, then it isn't her body and she is murdering an individual person. If you don't condone murder, then why do you deem it OK to murder someone in the womb? It's OK to murder someone if doctors and other people deem it OK. I'm not for it, but it isn't up to me. That is your reasoning. When is it OK with you to kill a baby in the womb. Up to 3 months? 4 months? When does it "become a person" and why do you draw the line there?
How does killing a random stranger effect you? That was your qualification of why you think abortion is OK. I'm just following your logic (not a strawman at all).
So a person on a ventilator can be killed (according to you) if they have no instructions as to their wishes (also your logic) since they aren't breathing on their own? It's not her body. Does she have 2 hearts, 4 legs, 2 heads?
Your argument has been used for a long time to justify genocide. Slavery was OK because they weren't human. Jews, not human according to the Reich. Do they have their own DNA, body parts, blood, nervous system? The answer is yes. Your argument boils down to location. They aren't people because of where they're located (according to you). It's a magic birth canal that confers person hood. A tumor is her DNA. A virus harms the person infected. Pregnancy is a biological imperative that is the result of a decision to have sex (or in rare cases) rape. Not even remotely the same thing and a nonsensical "argument". Is killing them 1 minute before birth OK by you?
"Clump of cells" at 12 weeks. Totally not a baby though /s. https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmother-top.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2F12-week-fetus-picture.jpg&f=1&nofb=1
Murder of a random stranger doesn't effect you either, but that doesn't mean it's moral. "Clump of cells" at 9 weeks. https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.0qOeUtp9SyKXHtxV4yupgwHaE7%26pid%3DApi&f=1
According to SCOTUS the matter is now moot. That's how this works, right?
I'll bet the reverse is also "white supremacy". "White supremacy" will become the new "racist". So over used, that it has no meaning anymore.
One day she'll wake up to what she's done to herself, and commit suicide. It's the transgender way. As to why people do this, mass psychosis.
They have a view that promotes an external locus of control. Conservatives believe that you have control of your own life and if something isn't how you want it, you have the capacity to change it (internal locus of control). Leftists believe that the problems in their lives are the result of external influences, and thus, can do nothing to change their condition. You're black and poor? Systemic racism and so you can never improve your lot in life. A woman and a single mother? Patriarchy is keeping you from succeeding. They're angry at life's circumstances and (wrongly) believe they are stuck in that position. That's why they are angry. It's a convenient scapegoat for poor decisions and perpetual infantilization.
Ric Grenell is calling people that object to normalizing trannys in the GOP, bigoted.
BUZZR on PlutoTV is all old game shows. It's free and 100x better than watching modern crap. Also there's a "The Price Is Right" Bob Barker years channel. "The Tonight Show", "Carol Burnett Show", Classic movies, Westerns, all on Pluto for free. Why bother with cable?
I agree with you. You have to have skin in the game to be able to make decisions about how it's played IMO. The oligarchs in power (let's not kid ourselves, our Republic has been gone a while) will never go back to that though.
You prove my point with your response. MGTOW it is the equal and opposite reaction to "feminism". It is identically corrosive IMO. Hating women is just as bad as hating men, and makes men just as miserable as "feminists".
Parler will ban you for wrong think. Knock Gab all you want for having literal nazis on it, but they value freedom of speech. Parler doesn't. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/free-speech-platform-parler-bans-milo-yiannopoulos/
There's also this oldie, about Paul Ryan (much as I despise him and Boehner). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGnE83A1Z4U
Your employer is not immune to being sued if they force you to get "vaccinated". Let them know in no uncertain terms, that if you have an adverse reaction, you WILL be suing them for damages. It's a good deterrent.
My comment is based on their voting patterns and preferences for government assistance. They want larger government to provide for them, which in turn leads to oligarchy/totalitarianism/communism. Whether they directly assert that they desire communism or not. To be logically consistent, you should state that minorities shouldn't be allowed to vote either since they have the largest percentage of people that vote for the left. People are afraid to say that, because it comes across as racist, yet have no concern about saying women shouldn't be allowed to vote. It's hypocritical and we should be better than that. Disenfranchising female Trump voters isn't a good policy if you want to keep support and grow it. Bash "feminazis" all you want though. I hope they get everything they deserve and more. They make life worse for everyone and make it more difficult for good women who get lumped in with them regardless of difference of ideology.
Couldn't some black based pede file a complaint that the shirts are traumatic because the statement invokes ownership, and thus slavery. It would be awesome to get started on twatter #Targetslavery or some other equally ridiculous nonsense with a picture of the shirt included. Hoist them on their own petard.
Can he sue for twatter claiming the fraud is disputed, when he has absolute proof of the fraud?
He need his stuff cut off. That should be the punishment for sickos like him.