2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you not see how absurdly hypocritical it is to argue against a belief system (religions) from the perspective of belief? It is logically incoherent and lacking any sort of merit or validity.

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not just a belief, it is a religion by your own standards. There are logical outgrowths of holding such a belief, which is exactly what a religion is. A belief that will serve a guiding principle for other things and actions in your life. My entire point is that you are hypocritically accusing the Q supporters of the thing you literally do yourself. Believing in something that you cannot prove or disprove 100%. Yes I agree its a belief, but please explain why your beliefs are better or more valid than the people you are attacking.

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +2 / -0

My personal beliefs are irrelevant. I am not using it as intellectual backing for the ideas and questions I am asking here. You could have avoided my criticisms by saying the same thing, my main point is by putting atheism as your main credentials for criticizing Q, you opened yourself up to criticism as it relates to your atheism. You would have had a stronger argument if you left that part out.

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +2 / -0

hahaha no, no I do not. My religion has nothing to do with your argument. You can't even explain why your atheism allows you to call something else a religion when you cannot provide an argument that atheism is a reasonable and logical philosophical view. I made the argument atheism is actually a religion itself, you have not addressed that. You made a claim, I criticized it and you are throwing a fit because things are going the way you hoped. Back up your claims like a big boy, or shut up.

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was flat out ignorant and lacking any sort of intellectual backing. This coming from the person who said just 10 minutes ago "why the hate?" You are the one who needs to wake up to your own lack of understanding and you have yet to address any of my legitimate questions and critiques. I do feel sorry that I tried to engage you in an intellectual conversation, seeing as you are unwilling and unable to participate.

3
anon10125051696 3 points ago +3 / -0

The point is you are being intellectually dishonest whether you know it or not. You are attacking one set of beliefs, and basing it on your own beliefs which you are implicitly admitting may or may not be correct, you don't have proof. Don't attack Q supporters, who frankly have a lot of valid arguments and info, whether you want to admit that or not if you are unwilling to back your beliefs with facts and data points. You might be correct, but you made a bold claim and you shouldn't be surprised that someone is pushing back hard. In the future, I'd recommend leaving out the whole atheist thing, its irrelevant to the point you're trying to make, but you made it central to your argument. There's no hate, just honest discussion and pushback.

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't think its weird, I've meant plenty of honest atheists. I just think if you're going to insult people, which you know was your intention with this post, you should expect to get pushback. it's not my fault you cannot back up your claims and fundamentally do not understand what you are even trying to say. You put the atheist part in there because you felt it gave you some sort of moral high ground. It doesn't. If you would have just said, "I believe Q is a religion, and the people who are following it have been played." I wouldn't have commented. Instead, you were hypocritical by being blissfully unaware of the fact that you are intellectually dishonest and claim to know for certain that God does not exist (the definition of atheism) and then trying to backtrack and say its just a belief and you don't need evidence. Again, your the one who used that belief to back up your claim about Q, I just pointed out the hypocrisy of your argument.

3
anon10125051696 3 points ago +3 / -0

A belief that there is no God. So you literally just admitted you do follow a religion, the atheistic religion. I think you don't understand what atheism actually is. It's a philosophical view that makes the claim there is no God. You have to back that claim up with something, doesn't have to be scientific fact. It could be a logical, philosophical, or moral argument, but even that is troublesome for the atheist position. You made a claim that (A) because of my atheist beliefs, (B) I can see Q is a religion. I am asking you to back up portion (A). What is it about the atheistic beliefs that allow you to see Q is a religion? you cant even back up your own beliefs, you just believe it whether there is a reasonable position contrary to your view or not. that's exactly what you claim Q followers are doing.

5
anon10125051696 5 points ago +6 / -1

I don't have that proof. Unlike you I won't be arrogant enough to make the claim I have the proof though. I don't believe a pink unicorn controls everything, but yet again, I am not willing to make a claim as a fact that I cannot back up with evidence. I never defended Q, nor did I make a weak argument. The only person here unwilling and unable to back up their claims is you. You stated your atheism gives you the magical power to see through something many feel they are able to back up with evidence. It's possible you are right in that Q is a LARP/ religion, its also possible millions of Q supporters are correct as well. I simply asked you to back up the fundamental premise of your argument because you seem to think you are able to take some intellectual high ground without having to defend yourself. Again I ask, what is your proof, or reasons behind being an atheist? If you cannot answer that question, why should anyone take you seriously?

3
anon10125051696 3 points ago +4 / -1

you made a positive argument in calling yourself an atheist. That is a direct claim that you believe there is no God. If you said you where agnostic, then you would be correct in saying you can't prove a negative. Instead, you claimed you know, for a fact, that there is no God. I am simply asking you to defend that claim. It appears you cannot.

5
anon10125051696 5 points ago +6 / -1

what evidence do you have there is no God? Dare I say your belief is based on faith in your own reasoning? Or are you going to say science has proved there is no God? By your own standard isn't science just a religion as well? Science has gotten many things wrong, that doesn't mean it doesn't have its purpose. You act like you have a solid intellectual basis for your beliefs (or lack thereof when it comes to God), but those beliefs must be based on some sort of human-designed system of reason, understanding, or logic, all of which have led to predictions that are false.

12
anon10125051696 12 points ago +12 / -0

Stop staying home. Civil disobedience is the American way

0
anon10125051696 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do you know what the word convicted means? Apparently not. You might believe he is a pedophile, I happen to agree. Despite that, Joe Biden is not a convicted pedophile because he has never been taken to court and convicted of pedophilia.

4
anon10125051696 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is really well thought out and I think its a very fair assessment even if I dont really agree. Honest question though, even if you are completely right, do you think people like you and me are just going to fall back in line? The whole spy-gate fiasco has brought so much attention to systemic corruption we now have legitimate evidence to back up what was labeled "conspiracy theory" heading into 2016. Culture change takes a long time, and I dont think we can discount the ripple effect even small victories today will have in the future

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +2 / -0

No dems in Jail? Have you heard of Michael Avenatti? How about George Nader? Was Epstein publicly being arrested and outed as a sex trafficker just nothing to you? I don't think Barr is a perfect man, but no one is. Stop expecting hundreds of years of corruption to be wrapped up in the first term of a Presidency that has faced more opposition than anyone since Lincoln. Gain some historical perspective and save your bullets for the real enemy. Q has done nothing but draw attention to a larger game being played right in front of the public's eye.

0
anon10125051696 0 points ago +4 / -4

It amazes me how few people can actually understand what you are saying here. As much as I wanted perp walks day 1, it would have come back to haunt everyone. The sheer size of the US government in terms of people make it virtually impossible to just walk in and get all of the bad guys at once. Imagine trying to find a group of a few hundred bad guys in a network of agencies that has millions of employees.

1
anon10125051696 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you honestly trying to argue that Trump is to blame for the Iranians killing civilians? You act like you are happy this happened. If this was nothing more than optics, why would the Iranians retaliate? Seems like you are the one caught up in optics.

1
anon10125051696 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry that your life is so sad this is what you have to do to feel even slightly happy. Fantasizing about the death of someone you do not know personally is not healthy. I'd suggest you seek help, but I'd feel bad for any sane person that would have to interact with you

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +3 / -1

You say "Fuck Donald Trump" and that you'll "celebrate his death." I don't know what world you live in, but that is not being supportive of someone.

4
anon10125051696 4 points ago +5 / -1

Trump is so deep inside your head you can't even ignore his supporters. You are the living embodiment of TDS

2
anon10125051696 2 points ago +3 / -1

Like I said, your life must be really fun.

4
anon10125051696 4 points ago +5 / -1

I know facts are hard but I would like to point out The_Donald was not banned. Also, I didn't say you dont have a right to post, just that you clearly cannot see the irony of your comments. Hypocrisy is a difficult thing for hypocrites to understand

view more: Next ›