1
anymouse22334455 1 point ago +1 / -0

that didnt stop 8 years of burning cities in thenobama years. Civil u reat is an excuse to take away your liberties.

2
anymouse22334455 2 points ago +2 / -0

he is asking to be added as a co-defendant. If accepted as an intervenor he can sunmit his own relief requests and evidence.

2
anymouse22334455 2 points ago +2 / -0

No where in the constitution does nancy become acting president. That falls to the vice president. The presidential succession act names the speaker as acting president only in the death/incapability of the president and vice president.

8
anymouse22334455 8 points ago +8 / -0

Scotus consolidates cases all the time. If they can hear them as one and issue a ruling that effects all the claimants they will.

5
anymouse22334455 5 points ago +6 / -1

It would become a non player. There are cases that are 'non justiciable' meaning the court doesn't recognize the issue or for reasons of their own punt on it. At that point the case would die on the vine. Docketing is the right step it also means 4 justices said they would hear the case and now its onto next procedures which is responses and oral arguments. The Texas filing asked for a summary judgment though. We have a 5-4 conservative majority on the court (fuck Roberts). I doubt there will be a summary judgement, the case is too important to no hear arguments. The court will hear arguments to demonstrate fairness.

6
anymouse22334455 6 points ago +6 / -0

Gotta secure that info before the American people can see the fraud. Coverup 101

3
anymouse22334455 3 points ago +3 / -0

If true the entire election can be nullified under the EO and we can go to atate legislators to select delegations for presidential voting under the 12th Amendment.

6
anymouse22334455 6 points ago +6 / -0

The best counter to this is to claim cancelling student debt is racist/white privilege and widens the income gap between whites and people of color. The left eats itself on this argument.

2
anymouse22334455 2 points ago +3 / -1

Either way we’re running out of time. 20 Jan is coming.

15
anymouse22334455 15 points ago +15 / -0

this a a land use case and doesnt apply to election law. Obviously fraud should cancel any bad deal as a general principle but if you cited this case in any election lawsuit your case would get thrown out on a 12(b)(6) rule violation for failure to state a claim. Election law rulings and property law rulings dont mix.

18
anymouse22334455 18 points ago +20 / -2

Good hide it from observers, that's more ammo to load into the lawsuit cannon and points to absolute cheating and unfairness of the election process. The states think they can hid behind state law, but if a complaint can allege with particularity in a fraud situation that the coverups and actions of the states violate the constitution then this elevates from a state to a federal matter. If this is CERTAINLY a federal matter where do you think it will end up? These actions are stall tactics at best, and prove the point that there is patent unfairness. Either way we are SCOTUS bound.

4
anymouse22334455 4 points ago +4 / -0

They certainly do. The crowdsource of TD.win helps them distill information. That distilled information is then picked up and fact checked and verified. This is why you see so many 'coming tomorrow' tweets. They have good leads from us, and work from there. To your point, we need to do our own verification because only the truth will win this, however I don't think the Trump team or anyone here on .win suffers from blind hubris as the left does.

2
anymouse22334455 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every article you see where some “republican” claims “muh election was fair” is an attempt by the media to calm us. The MsM should know this: we dont give a fuck who claims it was fair, we want proof. Hard indisputable audited proof that shows what ballots were cast legally and which ones were not regardless of candidate. We want to know we have a fair and sound election process. The verification of President Trump as the winner is a byproduct of that process not the purpose. Fuck outta here placing rinos on the news with your bullshit.

view more: Next ›