0
aric_cavanaugh 0 points ago +2 / -2

...while I don't advocate using Faceback, and do not have one myself, what exactly is the point in commenting that she isn't black when she very obviously is?...

2
aric_cavanaugh 2 points ago +3 / -1

The only people who were actually connected and engaged with reality as it is and was were the people called "doomers". And the people calling others "doomers" were retards who believe everything Lin Wood said and Q said.

And they were dead wrong about everything. So yes.

That's bad.

1
aric_cavanaugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, didnt red 1 and 2 already happen? Red 1 was deplatforming from Twitter...

See, here's the lovely thing about these sorts of "predictions". You can contort what happens into them to give it meaning.

It is not a meaningful prediction that Trump would be booted from Twitter. That's been obvious to anyone with a brain for the last while that they'd do it eventually.

All the rest of it, the prediction in its entirety is what is false. You hold to RED1 as though that somehow means all the rest of it is valid, when it is objectively not the case.

If we have a firefight and mass arrests tomorrow and a military take-over? Then, sure, that'll have been right.

If we don't? When we don't?

False. Totally false.

1
aric_cavanaugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do understand he doesn't need to do either of those things in order for the transition to occur and for Biden to be inaugurated? Neither of those are a pre-requisite. They don't matter.

7
aric_cavanaugh 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, they will either not take up the case (grant the writ of certiorari), or simply state that due to the inauguration on the 20th the case is moot.

1
aric_cavanaugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Name 1 obvious bullshit that was made up?

All the RED1/2/3/4/5/6/Castle Rock shit that has been going around here for the last while, to name one, obvious piece of bullshit.

Also you clearly did fuck all research on Q.. Because there is NO SUCH THING as Q-anon... There is Q, then there is Q+ and then there are we the "anons"... so when wou say shit like Q-anon, I have no fucking idea what you are referring to...

Nah, you know exactly what I'm referring to.

How did it make more people aware of? Mainstream media was talking shit about the anons for a while during summer. About how its crazy conspiracy and whatnot.. I would think when a normie saw it, some would at least have a look...

It made more people aware of bullshit fabrications designed to mislead, and therefore it is worse than being uninformed. You have been actively misinformed.

2
aric_cavanaugh 2 points ago +2 / -0

How would it make people aware of what is going on, when what was claimed to be going on was an outright fabrication and completely made up?

Like, really?

Q-anon is an obvious fabrication full of obvious bullshit and people still cling to what was said as though it was true. It was not. Excusing it and defending it is a waste of your time and ours.

0
aric_cavanaugh 0 points ago +1 / -1

Trump said he deployed them. Trump hasn't said anything inconsistent with a regular transition to Biden. In fact he has said many things to support that idea.

And he has moved his stuff out of the White House and into Mar-a-Lago. So...

0
aric_cavanaugh 0 points ago +1 / -1

why else would you need 30k troops in DC 2000 of which have been deputized as federal marshalls which gives them authority to make arrests

  1. Because they're trying to drive a narrative that Trump supporters are insane terrorists, so they need to act like it.

  2. Because in 2016 they deputized 4500 LEOs as Marshalls for the same purpose.

2
aric_cavanaugh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where are the sources for these missiles being placed in DC, recently?

I've found some that suggest the missile batteries in DC were placed years ago, with documented evidence as early as 2006, if not earlier. http://cryptome.org/eyeball/belvoir-mb/belvoir-mb.htm

1
aric_cavanaugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

...the logic is really quite strenuous. How does filing a lawsuit, which makes good on their threat to do so, constitute merely "talk"? That's literally put-up-or-shut-up, and they put-up.

I hope they get absolutely destroyed in court, but like, it's very much not a case of them threatening lawsuits and then the lawsuits never materialize, they have very much filed lawsuits and we can assume they will keep filing lawsuits against the people they say they're going to file lawsuits against. That's the very opposite of "all talk".

5
aric_cavanaugh 5 points ago +5 / -0

To be fair, the news media are reporting on it in the last day or so.

0
aric_cavanaugh 0 points ago +1 / -1

The claim was that it was all talk. The reality is that they have filed. Now it's "oh they're suing in DC court, it doesn't count because reasons".

-8
aric_cavanaugh -8 points ago +4 / -12

All talk. That's why they filed against Sidney Powell, right? It's just talk.

Uggh, please at least accept reality when the facts are easily verifiable. Dominion is telling these people they're going to sue and has so far been backing that up with verifiable action.

2
aric_cavanaugh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine pointing to the fully routine and expected resignation of the incoming vice president from the senate as something indicating Biden and Harris won't be inaugurated.

Good lord.

2
aric_cavanaugh 2 points ago +2 / -0

She has not stepped down. She has pledged to step down at some point this year. She has also stepped down before, this isn't even the first time.

There's quite a difference between abruptly stepping down and completing a term and choosing not to run again.

0
aric_cavanaugh 0 points ago +1 / -1

There's nothing on a "prime minister of Germany" stepping down. They don't even have a prime minister.

view more: Next ›