1
astrogirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

It will be fucking hilarious when Schumer starts blacking up, no?

Actually, I think they should all have to wear Pagliacci costumes and vote through honking their clown horn.

by NoWay1
1
astrogirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, that was great. Way better than these dry press releases from MS and SolarWinds and FireEye.

Funny thing: a friend of mine from forever ago who's been doing IT security for 20+ years has a reply on thread. I feel like "fancy meeting you here!"

If this got comped in June...when did they find it? This weekend?

by Krunchi
1
astrogirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are two Joe Kims, and neither sounds remotely applicable.

FYI: Chinese often take on an anglo first name when they relocate to the US or UK.

3
astrogirl 3 points ago +3 / -0

There you go. Also, where are the AZ provisional ballots? If sharpies cause over-counts and thus rejected ballots, don't those need a look too?

5
astrogirl 5 points ago +6 / -1

Uh...the next tweet isn't the best news, guys: https://twitter.com/NicoleValdesTV/status/1327102017098006529?s=20

The issue is more complex. The GOP may not get their hand count audit in individual precincts because it's not clear that it's allowed in the law.

None of this may matter once the votes being actually changed by Dominion or Scytl or associated bad actors.

1
astrogirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, there are two issues. The switching that happened during the evening of 11/3 - I haven't see that data, and I don't think it's out there.

DJT now tweeting about Dominion - it's going to be BIBLICAL.

1
astrogirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think so, there's no reason to update an "estimate" every minute.

But at least that's a suggestion. I think there's no legit reason, in the end.

1
astrogirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, but I mean from the point of view of a normie...let's pretend we're supposed to believe these machines are just counting votes and aren't cucked.

Is there any logical reason why the vote total would drop? Imagine the MSM asking that simple question?

I can't think of any reason this should ever happen. Counting bubbles with an optical reader depending on position is very very simple programming. This machine code has to look like fucking spaghetti to obfuscate what they are up to, and when you see the timeline, it's obvious there's some fuckery afoot.

So, you're a tech at, say, NBC and you're running that vote ticker on the screen, generally managing the graphics. I know it's got to be mostly boring, but you don't notice that it goes DOWN (in total) sometimes? Or that one candidate drops and the other increases? Like never, ever?

2
astrogirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mail in votes are verified before they are fed into the machine to be counted (don't get me started on machines....), so why would the totals EVER go DOWN?

I'm not even talking about "vote switching" here, which is fishy as hell.

1
astrogirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kind of surprised there was no rally in St. Louis, actually.