Yep. Cancelling a company vs cancelling an individual citizen who needs a job to survive, are 2 different concepts. Doxxing and harassing loved ones (children) is also something the left exclusively does.
But some people here don't get it at all.
They want to continue pouring money into companies and these companies pour their money towards leftists causes. Then they wonder why there is so much corruption going on (using the money they gave to those companies). Some people are just too stupid.
That is a pretty big LARP right there to conflate "cancelling BRCC" with "opening up another war front with USSR".
Of course, I do see your point, but your shilling too much for BRCC, you don't see it that is quite normal. Even the left has "infights" like this, if you even call it an infight, there is only a handful of you guys spending too much effort defending BRCC.
If you are in a big battle (like we are now), and you realize that your "ally" is not an ally at all, do you not call them out now or you just keep pretending they are an ally?
And it is not like BRCC is doing much for this movement, or is politically important not to discard. I can understand getting along with a RINO like Crenshaw or Graham in the meantime, but BRCC?
People in this site are tired of placing their trust on a particular people / company, only to get stabbed again. Of course, there is going to be backlash. And if enough people make individual post about their disapproval of BRCC, then it would look like a collective cancellation. Individuals will hear the news in a delayed fashion, and will make post about it even in 2 weeks time.
It is normal when you have freedom of speech and thought in the website. Stop trying to control what people think.
yep, I have been saying this as well.
These days data storage is cheap. Have individual ballot counting staff have an overhead HD camera. They should be required to show the ballot from all sides and verify the details before opening, etc.
Next all political parties should have access to the recordings. They can pause or slowmo it when doing their analysis.
A in-person poll observer is still needed to make sure the counting staff actually runs all ballots under the video camera and that no other shenanigans takes place like trucks of ballots coming from the back door.
Easy.
Of course, it won't stop the people who really want to shill for BRCC or Tim Pool or Tucker.
But I am just saying, a little bit of site improvement can help. Not that we have any right to demand anything from the mods generous enough to provide this site.
Both sides are actually correct.
The problem I can see is that website (thru the generosity of the mods) does have some limitations on the number of stickies on the front page.
If the stickied threads can be categorized similar to the Categories on Breitbart site, then both sides would be happy.
e.g. 2020 Election, China Virus, Riots, Cucks
All ballots being opened and counted should be done with a video camera over head.
The recordings should be made available to all political parties.
If a political party wants to challenge the vote count, they can spend their own money to have a team run analysis of the video recordings.
If NewsMax does not get rid of Mark Halperin, they'd lose viewers too. He is not neutral at all.
If they want to keep him, then they should at least balance him out with another political analyst that is not Anti-Trump.
Move where?
Queensland - re-elected Labor even after that shit job.
ACT - elected Labor
Victoria - commie as hell.
NSW - looks like Gladys Berejiklian is in trouble.
The other states with Liberal Party in power, also seem to prefer lockdowns.
New Zealand - nope, superstar Arden just got re-elected there.
Depends how you define "doomer".
Seriously, some people in this site have this idea that everything will be OK doing absolutely nothing, "trust the plan", and that Trump is playing 500D chess. Absolutely stupid and creates complacency instead of taking action.
Reality is, no one knows how it will all play out. You just have to keep your ears to the ground and follow the updates.
For example, I think Pennsylvania, Trump campaign has a solid case to flip that once it reaches Supreme Court.
I have not looked into the other states yet, and how many votes are realistically flipp-able in each one.
If the Trump campaign can gather enough court-admissible evidences and specific number of votes to flip in each state, and it reaches Supreme Court, then yes, there is a good chance that the conservative majority Supreme Court will rule FOR Trump.
But the deep state aint that dumb either, they won't sit there and just wait for Trump team to carry their case all the way to SC.
If they wanted to, they would have done long ago. They cannot make him a martyr.
If Trump is killed, it would instantly redpill 90% of Americans, even the Dems, except the Antifa types.
The only people who benefit from killing Trump are foreign forces like China and Iran.
It does not mean they cannot Epstein the people around Trump, though.
Well, to be fair to Crowder, it does not make sense for him to stab a sponsor in the back. It is unprofessional and sets a bad precedent to future sponsors.
I am fine with Crowder not talking about the BRCC issue, but if he shills for BRCC then that is a different matter.
You are part of the problem.
There are times when people have to choose the high road. But there are also times when you have to fight fire with fire.
Cancel culture is one of those that you have to fight fire with fire. Tell me what other solution you have? Why don't you continue giving money to Nike, Taylor Swift, Chris Evans, Hollyweirds, Big Tech and Soros?? Then you naively wonder why left have heaps of money to continue buying off and corrupting everyone?
Also, there is a difference between cancelling an individual citizen (who is powerless, cash strapped, and has to provide for his/her family) versus cancelling a company. Your false equivalency is outstanding.
I think Sidney is telling the truth. However, she is creating a bigger fight than what Trump campaign could handle.
Trump campaign also could not risk losing too much support from the existing Republican party, and if Sidney is implicating both sides (Republicans and Dems) with election fraud, then it is not going to help Trump campaign win the battle in such a short time frame.
Do that and never win ever again.
There's a reason why Trump was smart in taking over the Republican party instead of running as independent.
If you are frustrated with the swamp in the GOP, it is all on you (American pedes), do your due diligence in getting rid of the RINOs in the primaries. If the RINOs survive the primaries, then Trump has no other option but to support them, and conservatives have no choice but to vote for them over a Democrat.
I notice a lot of Republicans only get involved during the actual elections, and complain why they get to choose between a shit and a bigger shit.
I can sense that the "Political Analyst" interviewing Sidney Powell on NewsMax is a leftie shill. 100%
the total lack of investigation from the DOJ and FBI about the "election irregularities" is conclusive proof that both Barr and Wray are deep-state plants.
Barr scratched Trump's back a little (during the Mueller investigation) to gain Trump's trust, and now during the most critical moment, he sits there doing nothing.
If Trump admin ever loses this (hope not), I can objectively say that hiring / not firing Barr and Wray are the biggest critical mistakes he did, and whoever the fuck recommended them are snakes.
Easy to say it is half-assed.. it seems they are trying to manage their funds for the multiple battles in multiple states + cost of legal teams.
It means funding is not enough.
Probably not going to happen, but it should happen even just to correct the voting results record for historical purposes.
What if Anaconda is your wife all along?
you think you can outbid Jeff Bezos?
I don't think Jared is in anyway a traitor. I just see him as the brains, but no heart of a fighter.
Remember, Trump himself has said in the past that he likes to keep both sides for advice, but he makes the final call.
It is just reading the body language dude.
My take on this..
Jared is on Trump's side and I don't see him stabbing Trump on the back. I am sure he is instrumental to Trump's team. But he does not seem to me like a fighter like Don Jr and Eric. With the overwhelming battle against deep state and intelligence community, it does seem to me that any normal person will flake out.
I definitely could see Jared trying to convince Trump to not take this battle.
When everyone close to Trump seems to be raising their voices against election fraud, and crickets from Ivanka/Jared, then you have to be naive not to notice it.
Of course, nothing will come out of it. No way will Trump throw his daughter under the bus, so he probably knows it and won't say anything about it, nor will people loyal to Trump say anything about it.
At the end of the day, Trump will not concede. He is the stubborn father who won't listen to uppity kids. But if things do go a bit south, Ivanka being the favorite kid, does have an influence to her father. Let us hope it does not end that way.
Jared and Ivanka? I havent heard any msg of support from Jared/Ivanka regarding election fraud.
If 70+ million Trump supporters boycotted Amazon, Jeff Bezos would not be as powerful as he is now.
Compared to Dems, for Dems, it is much easier to hire someone they already know is corrupt.
For Trump's side, they have to go and find a morally upstanding person who is also at the same has competency / experience for the position.
This is not easy, and no one single person knows the ins and outs of every subject matter. At some point, Trump has to accept recommendations. And if recommendations come from a sleeper snake, it is much harder.
And even if Trump personally wants someone as a pick, if it is a position that requires Senate confirmation, then he has to negotiate / play politics with the RINOs who won't just give him what he wants.
And even if he gets someone he trusts in a position, there is no guarantee they won't turn on him. Everyone is corruptible or blackmail-able. The deep state will find something to use on everyone, and if there is none, they'll threaten the kids and loved ones.
There is a reason why Trump wanted his kids involved at first, but they accused him of nepotism.
At the end of the day, Trump cannot really know who will turn on him or not. I am sure they are doing their best, though. Some are quite obvious snakes like Chris Christie. But Ric Grenell has been solid, and he worked for Bush administration. So you really cannot know who will be a gem or a snake.
Lastly, some people are just there when they have something to gain, and if they think the boat is sinking, they are quick to jump ship.