1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not. I was banned a couple hours after some retard US senator complained about "reddit conspiracies" on Congress after the Jan 6 false flag.

This list is from last year before I was banned.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Further reading:

This Is Where Reddit's "Anti-Evil" Policies Lead: Recently-added Reddit admin hired her father, who kept a young boy chained in his attic sex dungeon, as her agent, AFTER he was arrested. She also married a self-admitted pedophile and defended him. Reddit is banning anyone who mentions this story.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

YAF also on the list.

They're looking at various TPUSA chapters in almost every university and high school where there is one (for example high school members who are in the future soldier program, which is Army's version of Delayed Entry Program) + college age soldiers obviously already in.

Investigators also looking for the following in pictures: MAGA / KAG apparel, Gadsden flag, Confederate Flag, NRA gear, Q stuff

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this source is right, this is a huge scandal. NRA & TPUSA are not "extremist" groups. These groups' conservative positions are backed by tens of millions of peaceful, law-abiding Americans who support and defend the U.S. Constitution.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Capitol Hill siege pre-planned (meaning Trump could not have incited it with speech he was impeached over) - F.B.I. report is said to have warned of plans for violence at the Capitol.

  2. The media is nonetheless insisting Trump 'incited' the pre-planned attack with cliche political lines used repeatedly by even Democrats like 'take our country back' and 'fight'; after all such common political speeches in the past, there were no riots. - Incitement: a timeline of Trump's inflammatory rhetoric before the Capitol riot

  3. Evidence is scant/non-existent of rioters' plot to "capture/kill" lawmakers, despite earlier reports to the contrary. - US takes back its assertion that Capitol rioters wanted to 'capture and assassinate' officials

  4. At least some pro-Antifa/BLM activists among rioters (one went on CNN); mounds of evidence that crowd called out and tried to stop left-wing agitators (like shouting "fuck Antifa* during break-in; Trump supporters thwarted agitators on camera) - BLM activist egged on Capitol rioters: Left-winger who told CNN he was there simply to document the siege is arrested after video shows he smashed window, wore gas mask, told rioters he had knife and shouted 'we got to get this s**t burned'

  5. The riot was "deadly" (as opposed to aftermath) due to what appears to be a deliberate, organized breach by agitators that led to shooting of one person: Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt. Watch full, unedited video and decide for yourself.

  6. Parler was singled out by Amazon for supposedly allowing violent incitement to spread on its platform, but the evidence shows that much of the planning was carried out on Facebook. Facebook Played Major Role Coordinating ‘Capitol Riot’ As Sandberg Deflects Blame

  7. Democrats and media outlets suggest Republicans should 'resign' for Electoral College objections. Such objections are entirely constitutional and a practice Democrats used in 2000, 2004, 2016 (Trump's election). - Democrats who praised 2004 objections to Electoral College certification now slam Hawley

  8. Mainstream media worked to delegitimize Trump presidency for years with the Russia hoax; no social media suspensions, no firings for pushing fake news (in fact, some received 'journalism' awards). - Mueller Report Finds No Evidence Of Russian Collusion

  9. Hillary Clinton told Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances,' but media slam Trump for not conceding. Clinton claimed Republicans could try to “mess up absentee balloting,” however, such ballot rejections were historically low. - Hillary Clinton says Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances'

  10. The media is uncritically reporting an FBI advisery 'armed uprisings' are now planned for all 50 state capitols. It is not demanding specific intelligence for what groups have the logistical capacity to carry out such attacks. - FBI memo warns law enforcement across U.S. of possible armed protests at 50 state capitols

  11. President Trump not only specifically told those who attended his speech to "peacefully" protest before march to Capitol (siege began before marchers could have reached it), he explicitly disavowed violence and anyone who carries it out in his name. - Trump disavows violence, says free speech under assault

  12. Americans are drowning in propaganda to an extent never been seen in our nation's history. At the same time, there is a major push to quell dissent and free speech. We must seek ways to share the truth to counteract the rising threat that propaganda poses to our country.

8
axolotl_peyotl 8 points ago +8 / -0

The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus.

17
axolotl_peyotl 17 points ago +17 / -0

https://www.state.gov/fact-sheet-activity-at-the-wuhan-institute-of-virology/

The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer chimeric viruses. But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of studying viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus.

6
axolotl_peyotl 6 points ago +6 / -0

John Earle Sullivan's Youtube account is a treasure trove of damning videos.

One of the most fascinating videos is one where he just happened to be at the December storming of the state capitol building in Salem, Oregon.

video

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is most likely a strategic move by a foreign adversary. It puts the JCS in a difficult situation. If they claim the letter is fake, the leftist media mob will be all over them and the talking point will be, "Well is the military NOT on the side of Biden???"

It also forces the JCS to actually condemn the capitol "riot," or they will be thrown to the mob by the leftist media. The article itself may as well be very real given the gravity of the situation, and the fact that CNBC scooped it up shows that we are dealing with something much larger than an organized shill operation.

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Appreciated! I'll admit I was skeptical of Trump when he was elected, but russiagate opened my eyes and they've only kept getting wider!

No matter what happens, it's been an absolute honor to be on the digital front lines with TD during these crazy times.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

For those familiar with r/The_Donald, this might all sound familiar—mods on that subreddit similarly used Reddit to launch their own .win site, where conspiracy theories now run rampant.

I've been warning folks for years that the "conspiracy theorists" were going to become the new "domestic terrorists."

I tried my absolute hardest to keep /r/conspiracy from being consumed by the clutches of the aggressively pernicious conformity that has consumed the rest of reddit.

I made sure to allow even the most unpopular opinions and conspiracies, and as a result in the eyes of the mob that meant I explicitly endorsed those conspiracies.

I was a fluke. I was in the right place at the right time. I wasn't supposed to get into the position that I did, and I tried to make the most of it when I had the chance. I wasn't always right, but I always did what I thought was right, and my conscience is clear in that respect.

I was among the most, if not the most, harassed and brigaded account on reddit in the last few years. Entire communities were dedicated to burying all of my threads and comments, and engaging in regular witch-hunts and slander against me and anyone who dared defend me. There are many thousands of threads dedicated to mocking, harassing, and brigading my content.

The reddit admins explicitly condoned and even augmented this behavior.

I firmly believe there is an MSM-worthy news story in there somewhere if the actual details of this coordination were ever revealed...not just against me but against many users across reddit.

I spent more than 10 years of my life on that place, and I poured my heart and soul into my efforts.

I don't regret moving on now, and honestly I can't help but feel pride at how things ultimately went down. Imagine, I lost my decade-long position just hours after essentially getting called out on the Senate Floor! I mean c'mon, how cool is that?

Not only that, but my ban precipitated the Night of the Digital Long Knives, as I specifically predicted in one of my last threads. I always had a feeling that when reddit inc. came for my head, that that would be a major SHTF indicator. It sure was.

TBH, I always got the feeling that /r/conspiracy is still around because someone on the admin team is on our side. I know people say it's a "honeypot" or whatever, but at this point the information getting out is so damning that they're going scorched earth...there's no reason for them to keep it around at this rate of censorship. Will it last? Maybe.

That's why I hope that removing me was the "next best thing" to outright banning the sub...which may actually be in the cards anyway. But it does buy them some time.

Until then, I'll be pumping away on conspiracies.win and now gab.

Thanks for reading this, I'll see you on the other side!

Much love,

-axolotl_peyotl

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

However, others cheered Reddit’s actions

So that wasn't cheering. That was a well-coordinated, site-wide digital lynching, even by reddit's standards. It's still ongoing. In the many threads rejoicing at my ousting, you will find thousands of TOS violations directed against me, included calls to violence and to doxx me and my family.

In many ways what happened to me was a scaled-down version of what transpired with Trump literally the next day. As above, so below. They cut me off from communicating with my forum and prevented me from defending myself in the ensuing chaos, while the rabid masses cheered in their state-sanctioned 2 minutes hate.

saying the former head moderator had a documented penchant for banning those who disagreed with him

She actually cites a Top Minds of Reddit thread for this, one of the most notoriously toxic forums in the history of the internet, and that's not even hyperbole. What this claim fails to address is that the vast majority of accounts that I banned were all serial violators of the rules of our sub (or alt accounts evading their bans). In the many threads celebrating my removal, multiple users admitted I had banned "dozens" of their alt accounts, a clear violation of reddit's TOS and vindication of my efforts.

We have a really transparent process when it comes to bans. EVERY user banned is given an opportunity to appeal the action before the entire /r/conspiracy mod team. We frequently unban users who pledge to follow the rules of our forum...it's not a difficult process in the slightest.

The idea that I was solely responsible for whether or not people could speak on our forum is absurd on its face, and the fact that this "journalist" used TMOR as a source unironically is peak clown world journalism.

and elevating those who shared his often-extreme views.

Here she links a ridiculous article from a few years ago that I will address in another thread that essentially accuses me of being a Russian agent for not being convinced by Russiagate as a conspiracy theorist. They never forgave the conspiracy theorists for refusing to jump on board the "muh Russia" hysteria, so they went the "CT=domestic terrorist" route instead.

In a post on r/SubredditDrama sharing the news

Ah, so "sharing the news" means "hundreds of comments threatening and even calling for the user's arrest" now. I've lost track of the number of these unhinged individuals who claim to have "reported me to the authorities/FBI". FOR WHAT?!? These people...

She then quotes a random user on SubredditDrama, as if he was some sort of authority:

axolotl_peyotl was far right

Not true. In 2016 I was on record multiple times saying I would've supported Tulsi Gabbard over Trump. I was portrayed as "far right" like most conspiracy theorists in 2016 when I didn't immediately believe that Trump was in on some massive conspiracy with Russia.

I also was portrayed as "far right" because I had the audacity to allow right leaning opinions on /r/conspiracy as top mod. Apparently permitting speech equates with endorsing it. What happened to the notion of agreeing with someone's opinion but still defending their right to express it?

extreme pro-Trump

...see the above. I allowed pro-Trump content on /r/conspiracy and I questioned Russiagate. That's all it took to earn that label, apparently.

anti-vaxx

I'll admit I'm skeptical of most vaccines and at what age children receive them. I composed two megathreads called "The Skeptic's Guide to Vaccines" several years ago, but I included a disclaimer saying they were NOT meant as medical advice, and no where did I say you shouldn't get vaccinated at all. It's about being informed. I'm skeptical of the increasingly aggressive vaccine schedule, and I think the COVID vaccine is completely unnecessary, so if that makes me "anti-vaxx" then so be it.

anti-Semitic

Completely false. This is the same trap they lay for every conspiracy theorist that questions Israel...you're immediately labeled "anti-semitic." I barely even mention Israel these days because of it.

Six years ago, axolotl_peyotl took heat for stickying a pro-Hitler documentary to the top of the subreddit

Ah, the "Greatest Story Never Told" saga. Here's what actually happened: as /r/conspiracy mod, one of my projects was a weekly "featured documentary" where the community would spend a few days voting for a film to be pinned for a sub-wide discussion.

I've stickied many hundreds of films over the years because of this, and indeed on every wide-eyed, high octane conspiracy imaginable. At the time I recognized the optics on pinning that film weren't the best, but it's a consequential conspiratorial film no matter what way you look at it, and I didn't feel it was my place to simply "decide" as a /r/conspiracy moderator that it didn't deserve its time in the sun to be simply discussed, especially since it was actually what was voted up by the community.

He also faced accusations of banning users for disagreeing with an anti-vax stance

The "source" for this is literally a google search for "axolotl_peyotl vax"...smh.

and trawling through user histories to find reasons to ban them.

This person is laughably incompetent if they're legitimately oblivious as to how moderating internet forums works.

If we see a user violating one of our rules, it's literally our job to check to see if they have a history of rule breaking on our sub. Does she think that every new comment made is a clean slate?

If you have dozens of rule violations, you get banned, and we have to go through your history to check. Reddit makes it easy too...comments that have been removed by mods in the past are red, so you can simply scroll down quickly through a user's history that's currently under review.

If a significant portion of their user page is RED, they've had a ton of recent rule violations and that's a very strong indicator they aren't operating in good faith.

Axolotl_Peyotl has also weighed in on his mod removal and suspension on conspiracies.win, another conspiracy-minded site he’s been pushing on Reddit for the past month.

I wasn't "pushing" it, I knew I was about to get fucked by the admins and I made sure to have a contingency plan in place, that everybody knew about it, and that it was publicly linked to me (and not an impostor).

Looks like getting conspiracies.win up and running when I did was a pretty darn smart thing to do.

(quoting me): “There's already considerable more freedom at conspiracies.win...like a breath of fresh air."

Amen and awomen!

view more: Next ›