The address mentioned on the scanner is an apartment complex. This is a routine EMS call.

Boooring. Sorry.

1. Get Firefox or preferably Dissenter browser
2. Install BlockTube extension (Firefox, Chrome/Dissenter
3. Click the BlockTube icon to open settings
4. Add the list at the end of this post to "Channel name" list. EDIT: moved to pastebin for formatting reasons. LIST HERE Note: This list is not exhaustive - I have built it up manually over many months.
5. (optional) Check "Disable Trending page" and "Enable suggestions hide-only mode" at the bottom of the options page
6. Click "Save" and refresh any YouTube windows you may have open
7. (bonus) If you haven't already, install uBlock Origin to deny them ad revenue (I used to use Ghostery as well but those fucks just collect your data and sell it to their paymasters.

I have been doing this for a while because there is still a lot of non-political good content on YouTube, and I can't fucking stand their garbage recommendations. The real answer is Bitchute or Rumble, but for now I use all three - especially when I need to unplug from politics for my sanity.

Best of luck.

EDIT: moved list to pastebin HERE

And you think the crooked DA's across the country won't sue the operators of this site into oblivion? I wish.

I get it, but until everyone is truly anonymous on the deep web, and the deep web is truly accessible to everyone, no such luck. Even then, if anything gets popular it would get either hijacked or shut down by glow-in-the-darks.

With S230, we just get censored and suppressed. Without it, we basically have elites-only internet. Reform is the solution.

Of course Cocaine Bitch wants to support repeal of 230. Ending section 230 outright will expose website owners to lawsuits for user-posted content. All it will take is one troll to post something illegal and the site is liable.

Facebook, Google, and so on will be able to survive with their huge legal teams. Not only that, they will likely respond by introducing even more censorship for "legal protection".

Websites without large legal teams? Well, you tell me how fair the legal system has been lately.

At a very minimum Section 230 must be amended to eliminate the “otherwise objectionable” phrase from the list of items protected for removal, and introduce strong protections for political speech. See the linked article for a much better synopsis.

Section 230 text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Let's call this asshole at work and give them a taste of their own medicine.

NYT Article: https://archive.is/CQUvH His "publication": https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1113

His workplace: UPenn Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy Media & Press Inquiries: 215-349-5964 Phone: 215-898-7136

It might be technically true. Most computers don't have modems because these days they are really only used for Fax/Voice services and other specialized services.

Most computers DO have network cards/Ethernet interfaces.

It would actually make a little more sense for election machines to use modems - the amount of data to be transferred is small, the machines could connect in a much more secure point-to-point manner allowing for fast transmission of results while limiting exposure. The connections could be encrypted with a one time pad which is about as bulletproof as encryption gets.

It would be a hell of a lot better than just plugging them into random internet connected networks. But even with modems it would only take one of those machines getting compromised, and one common vulnerability across the machines and you are back where we started.

So fuck that. I work in IT security. High security. And the more I see, the more the only thing I want counting ballots are triple redundant homo sapiens.

I absolutely support removing these completely spineless crooked pants-watering federal judges. They should be impeached and disbarred with extreme prejudice.

Bump - this number works. Left message - DISPUTE THE ELECTORS and GET BACK BEHIND TRUMP.

I don't know about this video - he bases it off of a book written by the newspaper editor targeted by Heemeyer. The author/editor (Patrick Brower) obviously has a persecution complex if you read this article where he complains about "paranoia about government" and "right wing bloggers" on Breitbart.

Here's a quote from a guy who's "historical account" I wouldn't trust:

I can only hope that this anti-media and anti-governmental trend in our country fades away as a mere fad reflective of our overly partisan times guided by false narratives and outlandish conspiracy theories.

Newspapers are attacked because they generally do a good job of communicating the truth. And sadly, the truth itself, these days, is under attack.

I am sure there is more to the story, but I would take it with a massive planetoid-sized salt grain as told by this guy. Even more so considering he is getting rich (or attempting to) from said book.

EDIT: Wow, this guy is a serious piece of work.

“Trump’s and Bannon’s attacks on existing law enforcement arms of the government feed the notion that somehow our established structures of enforcement are corrupt and inept,” Brower said.

“The suggestion by Trump and Bannon, whispered, in fact, that there’s this ‘dark administrative state’ that really runs the government and that it needs to be defeated is nothing more than conspiracy mongering in a way the feeds the anti-government and anti-hero beast,” Brower said. “In this narrative, the destroyers of government become the heroes. Sadly, I feel many buy into this line of reasoning.”

This guy's book about Killdozer is very probably biased and would not be surprised if he omitted or manipulated facts about the story. He claims:

Town officials may have been a bit clumsy, making some administrative errors along the way, but Brower vehemently argues there was no old-guard establishment out to get an outsider.

I totally believe the newspaper editor and town officials were totally "clumsy" and just going 'whoopsie!' left and right - there's no bias here, no old guard, you are just all conspiracy theorists guys. Heemeyer was completely and totally crazy guy who pooped in a bucket. He was ompletely unreasonable from the beginning, nothing prompted this at all! He just snapped because honorable journalists told the TRUTH!

I could be completely wrong. But something about Patrick Brower stinks. I would enjoy reading the original newspaper coverage.

Chelsea's dad is Webb Hubbell.