4
bg4u 4 points ago +4 / -0

Make sure you don't notice anything while viewing this graphic.

Under no circumstances should you do that.

Are we allowed to notice that we aren't allowed to notice that?

4
bg4u 4 points ago +4 / -0

But we gotta get the GOP back in so they can get their shot at a payoff to pass a slightly watered-down version of whatever bill the Dems were going to pass.

3
bg4u 3 points ago +4 / -1

Everyone who thinks "we" will be taking back the House needs to realize that it's the same team. They are just changing players.

2
bg4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are definitely memory-holing this one as fast as possible. The "they're trying to divide us" hot-take that so many had was monumentally stupid and demonstrably false.

2
bg4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about using a motorcycle? Different insurance and laws usually. Insanely fuel efficient. Dunno if that's an option or not.

11
bg4u 11 points ago +13 / -2

If you are forced to defend yourself against a black aggressor, you are almost certainly going to prison. At that point then, is any reason at all to stop?

3
bg4u 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember that trial. The problem was, they didn't really have anything solid on her at the trial (far far less than OJ). I mean she really probably did do it, but they also weren't able to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't know if they should have investigated more or what, but I don't really blame the jury.

2
bg4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's be even more pragmatic. You can't go back to 1985, not ever. Even if you could, we would be right back here in 30 years, because we were started on this path long before 1985, and no one wants to get off it.

I swear, talking to boomers and genx is so incredibly frustrating because they know that something is wrong, but are in complete denial about the cause. It's like talking to a dying alcoholic who tells you they wish they could go back just one year, and they would go to the gym and get fit and learn to play an instrument. Like, yeah that's great and all, but that's not why your liver is burnt out.

I guess just keep simping for based black conservatives and based legal immigrants and signaling to your kids that racemixing is ok, and we'll just keep trucking right along in the same direction we've been going this whole time. In 30 years you'll be wishing you could go back to the good old days of 2021 when you didn't have half-black grandkids that quote Marx and hate white people.

2
bg4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're living in a dream. Your black neighbor is an extreme outlier.

Regardless of what values they might hold, you can't just mash people groups together when there are vast differences in capability and intellect. You will breed resentment as one group will out-perform the others. You can enslave the more capable group, or possibly you promote race mixing and hope everyone ends up more or less equally capable.

2
bg4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

ThE meDiA iS tRYinG to DIvIde US fRoM tHeSE FRieNDly PrEdaToRs

Don't let the Dems win guys! Sleep with your doors unlocked to prove Dems are the real racists!

1
bg4u 1 point ago +1 / -0

One doesn't preclude the other. And if both parties are on the same page, they can caucus together.

1
bg4u 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democracy is trash. The US was not set up as a democracy, not even remotely so. They like democracy just fine, as long as they can control the elections and import retards to vote for them.

And ((organized)) Christianity is severely compromised. Even totally independent churches can be compromised because the pastors and staff are human, and can be brainwashed just like anyone else through media and manufactured culture.

So no, this ain't it. They really do hate European ethnicities.

1
bg4u 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're placing way to much faith in twatter's blue checkmark. They can verify anything they want, including bots.

1
bg4u 1 point ago +1 / -0

And something like 80% of the so-called right calling him a glowie and saying it was fake.

Though in hindsight I wonder if that was largely manufactured to make people think no one on their side would support anything similar. There were real people saying it obviously, but I wonder how many were bots or shills.

5
bg4u 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's like saying the heart is more important than the liver. Arguably true, but totally irrelevant. You can have an entire country of white families, and still destroy that country quite easily by flooding it with trash.

The 'just have more kids' argument is a massive distraction (and often disingenuous). No one wants to have kids when some 60-IQ subhuman (brought here by your own government) will break into you house while you are at work and rape your 2y/o daughter and kill your wife.

Like yeah we are importing and breeding millions of wolves, and yeah they might kill a few of your kids, and yeah we have no plans to stop doing this, but really if you just have a few extra kids it will all even out. Oh and we are going to let the wolves vote and hold government office.

1
bg4u 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that's my bad. I guess you never actually made any argument at all. You just gave an example of when cash would be more useful, and implied that meant something beyond that example.

2
bg4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who the fuck walks around with $100,000 cash on their person?

Exactly my point. You've contrived a scenario that supports your argument, and then tried to claim that means all scenarios support your argument (or those scenarios are unreasonable). It doesn't work like that. Your argument non-falsifiable.

There's also nothing unrealistic about wanting to move or store 100k and it's massively easier to do that with crypto than with cash.

3
bg4u 3 points ago +3 / -0

In person. There used to be boards where you could find people people locally to exchange fiat. I don't know if they still exist, but I remember considering it back when bitcoin was like $1k, but was sketched out by the idea of meeting someone carrying around that much cash.

Also if you were doing anything with anyone overseas, I think the rules are super lax as to what they even need a warrant for. I think they can basically collect whatever they want on foreign persons. Not a lawyer though.

2
bg4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok now play this out again, but where you have $100,000 in cash, or $100,000 in crypto.

You aren't wise to some scam that everyone else has fallen for. It's just not the most convenient place to keep your beer money.

3
bg4u 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did you have anything tying it in any way to you or your bank accounts? Just curious.

If you bought it in cash and sold in cash, that would be pretty crazy for them to send you something. But if you transferred money from a bank account or something, yeah that would do it.

view more: Next ›