We can forget they are being used too.

Yes, according to their nature. It's not like they needed to be tricked into acting this way. Just enabling this behavior is more than enough, so that's what will continue to happen. Build an effective 2-tier justice system where non-whites can do whatever they want, and make self-defense illegal for whites.

Honestly sometimes I think the healthiest thing for this country would be to build a rocket and fire all boomers into the sun. Their minds are permanently corrupted by leftist memes like egalitarianism and diversity. Nero played the fiddle while Rome burned. Boomers are singing Kumbaya while their grandkids are being fed into a diversity-meatgrinder.

Here's your error, .. Although you crammed all 'whites' into the same train-car, they are not a monolithic culture, or even race.

Except I never made any claims about a monolithic culture, or a race, any of that. That doesn't make the definition erroneous. I'm not really interested in anecdotes about asians or whatever.

You seem to be trying to argue against having any definition at all, but then you offer your own definition. So I dunno. None of this is really an argument though.

More formally: "Whites" are defined as the intersection of the set of European-derived nationalities and the set of Caucasian nationalities.

I don't really understand your comment. The definition I offered isn't convincing because of... what? I'm not really seeing an argument here.

If you want to structure this as an argument, I can respond to it. I just have no idea what you are claiming here, or how it's supposed to invalidate my definition.

What is White?

On the off-chance that this isn't some bad-faith argument (like it is probably 99% of the time), I'll offer a simple definition for White:

Caucasians of European descent.

That's it. Let's go back to u/NRAPepe's question now.

What makes you think they need or care about a response? I'm pretty sure things have progress way beyond the need for that. That's a strategy for when you have few numbers, not for when you are flooding the country with ground troops.

Here's what I expect to happen: When the country is 75% non-white and we're living under anarcho-tyranny, the last boomer will die trusting the plan, secure in the knowledge that he was never tricked into doing anything, his conscience free from having ever committed racist wrong-think.

DESTRYOYED by FACTS and LOGIC!!!111 ...oh leftists are immune those those things? Guess we have to compromise with their insanity again. yep

Joke's on them, I'm gonna HODL and buy the dip too

There's plenty of room for both. It's not either/or.

So about 33% jogger then?

Bitwarden is opensource and you can host it yourself. You don't really need to trust them to use the software.

Some people will, but the same people who spent the last 3 years trusting the plan will call you and anyone supporting you a glowie (despite having no clue where that term comes from).

Anyone resisting is part of a secret plot to make it easier to do what's already being done with ease.

Most of that info is extremely outdated. Those conclusions were based on the demographics and political landscape at the time. America is no longer 90% white.

I'm not sure what you are basing your assumption on that war leads to communism. You should probably explain that, because it really doesn't follow, historically.

We sacrificed a shit-ton of young men to save Poland from an aggressive authoritarian state, only to hand Poland over to a different aggressive authoritarian state.

Then the Boomers decided to open the borders to an army of trash and surrender to them. I think I'd rather have kept speaking English instead of whatever dogshit arabic-chineese pidgin will be taught to children in 40 years or so.

All of it.

I have to say, I understand the sentiment (though I agree in this case it's unnecessarily directed at OP personally). I've spent my whole life watching boomers pilot this ship into an iceberg, refusing to change course (or allow anyone else to change course) because of muh racism and other leftist memes (which even now, they refuse to abandon).

Now that we're actually on top of that iceberg, they seem to have nothing to offer but praying-hands-emojis and other nonsense that comes across as insincere. Bitterness is easy to understand in that context.

Don't put them on your LAN? Mine are on their own VLAN. They can talk to each other, and to the internet.

Only if they didn't staple the coax or put any foam insulation around the holes. So extremely YMMV, but worth a shot.

(((

I have no clue. I find her repulsive.

That said, there is a "hot latina" meme that seems to be embedded in the minds of some portion of the population. Mostly genx and boomers from what I've seen (that's purely anecdotal of course, though an actual study on that would be hilarious). No idea where that came from. Some movie in the 60s or 70s probably.

Yes. The government was probably 80% responsible for what happened in 2008.

Crashing this fund, with no survivors!

China has a majority stake in AMC.

I don't mind that not everyone is going to take action. But I'm not going to condemn those who do. The left never condemns leftist political violence.

I do not condemn so-called right-wing political violence. I'm not legally compelled to do that.

One or two people will do something. Everyone else will be tripping over themselves to be the first to condemn the violence (of the one or two people who did something).