-4
bgny -4 points ago +2 / -6

The CDC is making a claim with nothing to back it up. Why would the CDC do that? What reasoning do they have to claim it when not even one study backs up the claim?

If they want to claim it, they should have done studies or at least say "we don't know yet, because we have no studies", right?

In other words: WHY ARE THEY LYING?

5
bgny 5 points ago +5 / -0

Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia’s Link to Wikileaks — HUGE DEVELOPMENT

11
bgny 11 points ago +11 / -0

Its been a bad week for the (D) in the SCOTUS. This case is really why he is uber triggered. They are poised to lose dozens of (D) Created departments that wield massive power. Sotomayor and Ginsburg were the only holdouts, and he is super pissed !

https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/03/argument-analysis-justices-divided-in-challenge-to-cfpb-structure/#more-292240

7
bgny 7 points ago +7 / -0

PDF Report: Audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Efforts to Identify Homegrown Violent Extremists through Counterterrorism Assessments

FBI had "previous involvement" with the terrorists behind Boston Marathon, Pulse Nightclub & Fort Hood.

Do the FBI suck that bad at their jobs or did they not want to stop these incidents for some reason?

If you're awake, you'll realize this is just soft-disclosure that our own trusted agencies were being weaponized by the Deep State to massacre us for political advantage.

Dark to Light.

0
bgny 0 points ago +1 / -1

Optics. Media game. You'll see. Trump is using Q in his ads now and retweets Q Anons all the time. YOU are the one that is wrong. YOU are the one who does not agree with POTUS since he likes Q just fine.

0
bgny 0 points ago +2 / -2

sessions was addressed in July of last year. He was playing a media game with Trump while Sessions did what he had to do. He will be vindicated as a hero. Try and keep up. And since Q is good enough for POTUS WHY NOT YOU?

https://qmap.pub/read/3371

https://qmap.pub/read/3385

view more: ‹ Prev