Biometric eye scans for each voter.

And smash the fucking machines! Hand count every vote.

Who the fuck subscribes to the wsj?

When you're going through hell ... keep going.

Winston Churchill

Good luck by the way.

I am trying on other sites to get programmers/ data scientists to run the numbers through Mebane's toolkit. Sadly most of the posters on here appear to be degenerate idiots.

If I could get the precinct level numbers for key counties like Philly and Allegheny I would be confident of running most of Mebane's tests. Google sheets calculates Kurtosis and Skewness. Not being a statistician I was impressed!

I don't know how normies are supposed to manipulate this amount of data. I downloaded the PA data files and they are text docs in Notepad. Completely impossible to interpret on their own. Copying and pasting even the smallest county into google sheets and it goes above the maximum cell usage of 5,000,000.

So what are you guys using to make this data usable?

"001016416-05" "" "STOEFFLER" "ROSE" "M" "" "F" 03/10/1936 01/01/1972 "A" 03/19/2013 "D" "253" "" "FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE RD" "" "" "BEDFORD" "PA" "15522" "" "" "" "" "" 11/03/2020 "0202" "0202-1" 10/14/2020 "" "0202" "" "SC05100" "MN2" "MD57302" "STH078" "STS35" "USC13" "SR05100-1" "CNTY" "" "" "0202-1" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""

I have no idea how to manipulate that amount of raw data. Google sheets has a limit of 5000000 cells per page and the smallest Penn state county has more than that. I can't interpret the data from a notepad file!

Are you a data scientist?

It's several massive notepad files with names and data strewn all over the place. I'm not a data expert and I would think it needs manipulating before any normal person could make sense of it. The first line of Allegheny is:

"001004817-02" "" "BAUM" "GRACE" "W" "" "F" 09/29/1926 01/01/1956 "A" 11/20/2013 "R" "1094" "" "FOX CHAPEL RD" "" "" "PITTSBURGH" "PA" "15238" "" "" "" "" "" 11/07/2017 "1440002" "1440002-1" 06/04/2018 "" "1440002" "" "SC27" "MN144" "MD204" "STH030" "STS38" "USC17" "CPC00" "CAC03" "02" "" "1440002-1" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "AP" "R" "AP" "R" "" "" "AP" "R" "AP" "R" "" "" "" "" "AP" "R" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "ALLEGHENY" ""

Great. For any normal person not on the autistic spectrum that data is about as useful as a chocolate teapot.

Not a statistician unfortunately.

I'm not a statistician and I don't have VPN to do the download.

Try typing "hicken and mebane election toolkit" into google.com.

Not for me. You should be able to find it yourself. Walter Mebane and Allen Hicken (University of Michigan) 2017 Election Forensics Toolkit and Guide.

2BL is different to Benford's Law and one of seven main tests.

Well done for getting this far.

OK. You don't trust me. You don't have to trust me. Just Don't be dumb.

Do your own research and go find academic papers on Forensic Election analysis. Benford's Law is not the silver bullet you guys think it is.

Go and find out the pre-eminent Forensic Election academics for yourself and what they have to say on statistics. Then you will find Mebane's toolkit. Unimodality, skew, kurtosis etc etc.

But if you are too dumb to even do that then you shouldn't be on this forum.

Walter Mebane - why don't you guys spend five minutes researching before you deport people. If any of you had bothered to do so you would have found out that Mebane has been studying election fraud for twenty years and has compiled a toolkit with many different statistical tests which together are reliable indicators of election fraud.

But no, don't bother to research the guy who has spent decades studying, just deport the guy because he posts a link a couple of times.

I want someone with all the data to run it through the toolkit = Academic proof of fraud.

Out of interest, which statistical test are you currently using to prove fraud?

Why? Which tests are you using to find fraud - Benford's Law? Low information idiot.

I have. I don't have the data.

What's wrong with Forensic Election Analysis?

What's wrong with posting a link to a forensic election analysis toolkit?

Why would you want to deport that?

What's wrong with a forensic election toolkit?

I thought that's what you guys are trying to prove?

What not use the toolkit to prove fraud?

Why don't you actually look at the report instead of thread policing?

Trump, Giuliani and McEnany, voting machine instead of printer, baseball labelled with whatever Bill Trump intends to ban voting machines.

No, don't bother so much with the dead voters. Please run the number through this forensic election analysis toolkit:

https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Publications/DFG-UM-Publication

SMASH THE MACHINES!