1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +1 / -0

? If you read my post it says I refuse to use Facebook, Reddit, all of those. The title of my post is Drudge is done, but no I have not been using Drudge probably for a few months now when the page took a sharp left turn. Seems like Conservatives are being locked out everywhere we go nowadays.

1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately it seems Dominion has struck Canada as well and helped Trudeau.

2
bjjmike69 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re kidding right? Unemployment was the greatest it’s ever been until the Democrats and CCP work together to release covid

2
bjjmike69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Frankly when I saw that fly I knew shit was bad. I mean come on what are the chances? Happening to Hillary in prior Election?

2
bjjmike69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember The Gulag Archipelago, as long as we still have our guns then we still have a chance.

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrest, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood that they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. What about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur – what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs [Soviet state institutions] would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

If…if… We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation. We spent ourselves in one unrestrained outburst in 1917, and then we hurried to submit. We submitted with pleasure! … We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward. "

1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn’t Flynn allude to it also?

3
bjjmike69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you sure? That was my initial understanding, but then someone on here said that there only needs to be Senate and House going different ways (causing a deadlock).

0
bjjmike69 0 points ago +2 / -2 (edited)

If one house rep and one senator both sign that they disagree with the electoral votes, then it goes to a vote in both the Senate and the house. At this point if the Senate word of vote one way in the house the other way, this would trigger a contingent election by state legislatures. Or, if both houses of Congress Agree on the same slate of electors, then there is no need for the contingent election.

Pretty much we have a couple people in the house that are willing to sign, historically I believe it’s harder to find a senator to sign. In this case of rand were to sign on, he could force the Senate to vote and obviously go against the Democratic House, triggering the contingent election. But we all know our margin is too thin in my opinion, Romney etc etc. however if Trump gets word out of just how bad the fraud was, I could see RINOs voting for the contingent election

4
bjjmike69 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have a girlfriend who works at Cheetahs and she’s constantly worried about the club closing. Kudos to their owner who keeps fighting for them

4
bjjmike69 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was always my belief that in 2016 trumps popularity over took the 2 to 3% dominion vote switch. Same thing happened in 2020, except this time they literally had truckloads of pallets ready to go after the “pipe burst”

1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think this perspective she gave me was really helpful for me because while I still think Trump will pull it off, in the case he doesn’t, I take solace in the fact that maybe, just maybe, I need to take a step back and realize there are ebbs and flows. Election fraud has happened in the past and will happen again in the future. Trump has been a very polarizing figure, maybe the most polarizing ever. Which while I think allowed him to win in 2016, also hurt him with how much the other side despised him

3
bjjmike69 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s my understanding that it is mostly a precaution. If somehow the states electoral votes are found to not be for Biden (SCOTUS ruling or something), they can award them to Trump because his electors placed votes instead of just nullifying the state.

-1
bjjmike69 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I am pretty sure we need at least 1 House rep and 1 Senator to officially contest at counting time.

1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Presumably they would need to certify the actual fraudulent election before a crime has been committed

1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could you elaborate? I'm not quite sure what you mean by "two generations of fighting the indoctrination is a foregone conclusion." Do you mean, like, two generations (millennials and gen z) will have to fight?

1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's likely his plan might be to also have his electors submit their votes so they don't miss the deadline. This would cause two slates of votes to be sent to Pence to count. It buys time and ensures that when he does find fraud, there is no technicality on why Trump can't win (i.e., the electors missed the deadline!)

view more: Next ›