4
blackdudeinresidence 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're back on Youtube now. Listened to them on Saturday via YT.

Regular schedule is 10 AM and 5 PM EST on Mon - Sat. I don't think the show is live on Sunday. During their Youtube banned, I watched them on https://pandemic.warroom.org/

Can also listen to the recorded show via Podcasts.

3
blackdudeinresidence 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah! This is what confused Maria:

SP: "I mean we're talking about hundred-million-dollar [sic] packages for new voting machines, suddenly, in multiple states" (excerpt)

MB: "Which governor, or which government official, accepted hundreds of millions of dollars in benefits for their family as they took on this software?"

The equipment and services were 100s of millions of dollars. I think it was about 400M for Georgia's package.

1
blackdudeinresidence 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not that. They throw their names in the hat like everyone else, but people electing or appointing ignore qualifications and go for the "1st [identity] of [office name]" claim, so they can signal how great they are for voting/appointing the first whatever. Once you get them in, people are notoriously lazy and keep voting for them until the official resigns bc the failures are too great or they get busted for some illegal activity.

1
blackdudeinresidence 1 point ago +1 / -0

The most dangerous thing about all of this is they will not admit when they're in over their heads. It's a huge pride issue, not acknowledging failure and incompetency in the role or voluntarily stepping aside when witnessing the obvious failures from their actions and omissions.

When I was in Seattle, another issue I saw is having these globalist/liberals furthering the damage by purposely providing errant and destructive advice to these officials to push their own agendas. It's really cluster...

Seattle was home to Police Chief Carmen. She finally stepped down though after years of Antifa and other anarchist wreaking havoc on the city of Seattle. Seattle didn't sit well with me. I got invited to a lot of private events, but I knew it wasn't because they knew me. It was simply because of my skin tone. If I was a grifter, I would have cleaned up in Seattle.

In a lot of these cities, liberals/dem party are so focused on getting a "1st [name your identity] into [name the office]," that qualifications don't even matter. Then they have cocktail parties, fundraisers, and dinners where they pat themselves on the back for setting someone up for failure.

3
blackdudeinresidence 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not a violent man, but if I could for a moment reach through a television and grab someone by the throat, he would be on the receiving end. Completely rude, shell of a man. I don't care what kind of beef you have against a woman, you definitely don't do what he did on national television the other day with a PDJT rep. Fortunately, he's the one that looked really bad.

2
blackdudeinresidence 2 points ago +2 / -0

This flare is incredibly spicy! first time I've seen it. lol

2
blackdudeinresidence 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t know about the senior situation, but that 100% looks like the guy who sucker punched that one dude who also got his phone stolen. They found the girl who stole the phone.

Is this the same situation or was this thug involved in multiple attacks?

287
blackdudeinresidence 287 points ago +287 / -0

These black female mayors and police chiefs are an embarrassment. I’m sick of seeing them. Like most of the black women I’ve dealt with who don’t have conservative principles, they’re vindicative and literally do not like white people. I’ve been introduced to women like this to date, and the hate is real.

It’s pretty bad. I blame negligently uninformed inner city black folks and white liberals for putting these people in office.

2
blackdudeinresidence 2 points ago +2 / -0

They certainly live in their own worlds, don't they? geez.

6
blackdudeinresidence 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep, I've warned my brothers about this so they can prepare for their families. Shrugged off...Most people are oblivious and indifferent about what's going on today, which is why I've turned to TDw.

1
blackdudeinresidence 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you’re indifferent towards state and federal laws, you’re free to act whenever.

If you do care about law and order, you have to wait until you’re presented with situations that provide you with exemptions for complying with laws, ie self defense.

I recommend people learn about what they can carry in various jurisdictions and understand the legal defenses that can be used in case LEO comes after them for protecting yourself and others and they end up being prosecuted for responding.

We’re seeing all this play out with Kyle.

3
blackdudeinresidence 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol his voice is higher than hers.

3
blackdudeinresidence 3 points ago +3 / -0

He was a reporter on RSBN for a few rallies.

3
blackdudeinresidence 3 points ago +3 / -0

I said this a while ago, pull a page from Silicon Valley and act and apologize later, so that would mean kicking doors down, arresting people, and seizing assets. If nothing comes up after the fact, we have courts, they can sue for “muh due process violations.”

1
blackdudeinresidence 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw some other people asking about this though. For this weekend, where is the admin to support its base when the feckless mayor and lackeys aren’t doing their jobs to keep antifa/blm from attacking members of the base?

Update from the man himself: https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1327824600760274945

2
blackdudeinresidence 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was distinguishing between criminal prosecution (guilty) and civil proceedings (liable).

1
blackdudeinresidence 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we can have a rebuttable presumption Antifa/BLM starts everything, and it's on them to prove they didn't.

3
blackdudeinresidence 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fraud is an umbrella term. You have to drill down to individual statutes to see what mental state, i.e. "mens rea", is required for finding someone liable or guilty. Some require intent and some don't require any mental state, which falls under strict liability, and in those situations, you can be found liable or guilty for just doing the act.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›