2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s the bullshit Fauxi is pushing to justify more lockdowns. Is it effective? Is it not? He vacillates both ways to construct this moronic logic trap that results in “everyone must get the vaxxx but nobody can come out of lockdown”

It’s pure Faucism!

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pattie Boyd became a raging alcoholic with Eric Clapton, that’s why she aged so poorly. Barbara Bach was attractive, but it was all body, her face was fairly plain. Pattie (in her prime) had a gorgeous face as well as a great figure.

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you assert that a person who was one sexual preference for a period of their life and changed to another was just “gay” the whole time and faking it otherwise? That a person is not capable of deciding what sex to be attracted to?

4
booblitchutz 4 points ago +10 / -6

Lots of shills up in this site trying to convince the world that this site is a "HU-WITE SUPREMACIST" haven.

So they make a bunch of hate filled comments and upvote them, and downvote comments like mine.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's... I mean, have you never suffered a massive trauma?

It's extremely common for a person to wake up in the hospital after being in a major car accident having no memory of the events leading up to the wreck.

"Last thing I remember I was walking to my garage..."

There are countless examples of people who were molested as children not remembering it until later in life. I know this fits your worldview but you're completely, demonstrably wrong here.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +4 / -2

There is massive resistance in the scientific community to even considering this as a possibility. Politics prevents any meaningful research into the topic for two reasons:

  1. It implies being gay is "nurture" and not "nature" which is politically incorrect, and

  2. It further reinforces the pedophile cycle that exists among men who target boys.

Both of these are completely blacklisted in the scientific community, to the detriment of victims past, present and future.

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

And a broken clock is right twice a day.

The point is that the exceptions don't disprove the rule.

3
booblitchutz 3 points ago +3 / -0

NO vaccine gives you 100% immunity, that's not a thing that exists.

I can't believe the media narrative has warped so many minds on this issue...

4
booblitchutz 4 points ago +4 / -0

That never happened to me. I always got the shot and had no reaction. I hear people say this all the time though, so maybe some people just reject the flu shot? Who knows.

But the point is that after all this nonsense this year I'm starting to think I'll be fine without it next year.

3
booblitchutz 3 points ago +4 / -1

It used to be common knowledge and accepted that the flu shot was only partially effective. It would reduce your chances of catching it to about 40%, higher if more people took it.

This whole narrative about 95% effective is clearly bullshit. I can't believe anyone is buying it. You're falling for it and trying to apply it to the flu shot, which NEVER claimed to be 95% effective!

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know if I'd go that far, but compelling people to take any vaxxxine is certainly bullshit.

8
booblitchutz 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have gotten the flu shot every year for many years. After all this I may start skipping it, see how it goes.

7
booblitchutz 7 points ago +8 / -1

Welp, I mean the flu shot you can still catch the flu.. it's like a 40% reduction, which is still good, but you know.

10
booblitchutz 10 points ago +10 / -0

Exactly. Literally nobody will care that Behar is a fat lying hypocrite. She makes that abundantly clear on every day ending with a "Y".

Conservatives canceled for saying black face isn't always racism, Behar literally GOES in black face... nothing.

We need to stop asking them to apply their stupid rules to themselves (which they will never do) and start going on massive offensives.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›