2
boreal_storm 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just watched Total Recall last night.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never give up your guns. As long as there are millions of armed patriots, the politicians will harbor some respect for them. As soon as the guns are confiscated, the politicians will treat the citizenry as serfs.

3
boreal_storm 3 points ago +3 / -0

The rats made this outcome inevitable.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

The man who fired Douglas McArthur. Also, the man who was CiC in the first war that the US did not win.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Major Kong has entered the chat.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't Biden wanted in the Ukraine? If so, arrest him now and extradite him.

3
boreal_storm 3 points ago +3 / -0

However, there's never been an elector withheld.

Untrue.

During the civil war (election of 1864), southern states' electors were withheld. During reconstruction, some southern states' electors were uncounted.

Even in the latter phase of reconstruction, in the 1872 election, the electors of AR and LA were rejected due to voter fraud.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe you are correct. The threshold for victory is a majority of appointed electors. Currently, the usual majority is 270, assuming no electors are rejected. However, if electors are rejected, the threshold falls below 270.

Robert Barnes is barking up the wrong tree. In a 2-man race, a tie is the only way a candidate cannot attain a majority. Funny that a lawyer can't do simple math.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

The votes in question were not legally cast, because the new voting regs/laws were not lawfully enacted.

Your side wants to county harvested and other illegal ballots.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, I am sorry that adamschiffsneck2 left. If he was legit, I wished he had stuck around.

(For the record, his lifespan on the site was 2-3 days.)

5
boreal_storm 5 points ago +5 / -0

MIC = Military Intelligence Community ???

Is that correct?

3
boreal_storm 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not sure. Maybe she just wants Americans to understand the process and the rationale.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why does an Australian have such a keen interest in the minutiae of an American election? And why do you say "we" in some of your posts, as if you had a personal stake in this election? Were you attempting to pose as an American?

view more: Next ›