People say every election is the most important one of our life time. But I think it truly applies to this one.
Donald J Trump has so completely exposed the leftist, globalist, deep state hypocrisy, corruption, and wicked agenda that they are now willing to literally burn down our country to ensure someone like him will never happen again.
Tearing up the Constitution will just be the beginning.
There's a reason they haven't released a single frame of the images from the photographer. edit: it's actually TWO missing frames: https://thedonald.win/p/HrFc748i/the-photographer-appears-to-skip/c/
It's the one that clearly shows the shooters gun up and on target before the bear spray was even being raised, let alone dispensed.
This is the answer that President Kamala Harris will present us with after Sleepy Joe falls asleep for the last time sometime in January.
The fact that they won't say it right now only reinforces the truth behind it.
With 6 new justices, each decision would be 8-7 or 9-6. They would add D.C, Guam, and Puerto Rico as new states and get 6 new Dem votes in the Senate and 8-10 more House Reps as Dems.
Republicans would never get the chance to add new SCOTUS members ever again. Period.
https://thedonald.win/p/HrFT1uJF/x/c/17txabj327
It's a well known fake and posting it without shitpost flair makes us (you) look dumb.
Thanks for the kind words, friend.
They charged him with 1st degree murder, which implies they have evidence of premeditation.
I think the reporter and he intended to incite an incident where he could kill someone and have the appearance of a valid claim for self-defense. Except he was a total dumbass and just murdered someone, instead, and has no hope for self-defense. He likely confessed to that or discussed it in text messages on his phone, so they charged him accordingly.
But: when he got arrested, which I'm sure he expected, he no doubt claimed self-defense, and he no doubt tried to say he was hired security, thinking it would bolster his claim.
I just posted this about twenty minutes ago that I don't believe he was security or even hired by Pinkerton, and now that seems to be the case. As more of this unfolds, it's possible one or more other individuals get charged with felony murder as accessories to this.
You can't legally be employed or hire out as private security without the credentials to be one, which is all regulated at the state level.
Personally I don't think he even worked for Pinkerton, and they just lied about that on the spot. We'll see. I think he was "security" in the very loosest of terms - a guy with a gun who said he'd "protect" the "reporter."
The whole thing stinks, but the fact that he was charged with 1st degree murder implies that they have evidence of premediation. It's possible we find out that this was planned incitement with the intent to make it appear to be self-defense, only the shooter was a dumbass who murdered someone at the first opportunity instead of waiting for a "legitimate appearing" self-defense situation.
So after they got arrested, he and the reporter claim he was there for security as a way to help legitimize his actions and bolster his hope at self-defense (when reality says he has none).
I said it yesterday and I'll say it again now: I don't think he was a real security guard and I don't think he had any security-related training.
He was proficient in the usage of a firearm, but none of his actions line up with how a security guard would think when protecting his client.
All of his actions line up, instead, with a short tempered, poorly trained individual who also happened to be armed and proficient with the physical usage of his firearm (but not the mental and legal aspects of it).
Based on some other images, it appears that the deceased was carrying and had it in a shoulder holster on his left side. The police recovered a handgun from him. He never displayed it, however, to our current knowledge.
The shooter was reaching for that and the deceased slapped him away. Then the shooter started his draw, the deceased realized what was about to happen so he turned and created distance, and spun around at the last moment to attempt to pepper spray - and was shot at the moment, or milliseconds beforehand - that he started the bear spray.
MAIN POINT OF SELLING BELGIAN FIVE SEVEN PISTOL IS EXTREME PRICE OF WEAPON AND CARTRIDGE. BELGIAN FIVE SEVEN IS WEAPON OF MAN WHO WEARS EXPENSIVE ITALIAN FASCIST SUIT OF HAND SEWING, DRIVE HUGE EXPENSIVE NAZI MERCEDES OF A.M.G. SHOP, SAIL ON MASSIVE YACHT TO GREEK ISLANDS. I THINK YOU GET PICTURE. BELGIAN FIVE SEVEN IS WEAPON THAT SAYS IS NO SUCH THING AS CONCERN OF MONEY. FOR MAN WITHOUT EXPENSIVE SUIT, BIG BLACK MERCEDES, AND MASSIVE YACHT, BELGIAN FIVE SEVEN IS FOR PRETENDING OF BE RICH LIKE BLACK GANGSTER OF AMERICAN CITY WITH GOLD CHAINS OF LOW QUALITY AND JEWELS OF COLORED GLASS. WHEN YOU EXPLAIN USE OF BELGIAN FIVE SEVEN PISTOL IS ONLY FOR SHOOT MAN WITH BULLET VEST WITH CARTRIDGE ILLEGAL TO CIVILIAN, THIS MAN HAS NUCLEAR RAGE. WHOLE IDENTITY OF THIS MAN IS SPENT IN PRETEND PISTOL SHOWS HE IS RICH. IS VERY AMUSE. FOR REST OF WORLD THERE IS 9 MILLIMETERS OF LUGER WHICH IS SAME WOUND FOR COST LESS.
So in this comment, you are judging them based on their actions - which is good and the way it should be. Kyle was clearly justified in his actions and Denver shooter was clearly not.
The previous comment is where I had concern, because it seemed like you were judging the Denver shooter additionally by attributing some extra malice towards him using a commonly available and used RDS optic on his pistol.
Because if that's what you were doing, then you need to also attribute the same malice towards Kyle, who was also using a commonly available and used RDS on his AR-15. And I firmly believe doing so is wrong for both Kyle and the Denver shooter.
People like Kyle, faced with a jury of their peers, should not have their equipment used against them. Their actions - legal or not - should be the sole consideration of a jury of their peers. I applaud Kyle for being an excellent shot, for understanding how to use his equipment and to use it effectively. In an actual self-defense situation, using an optic or a laser or a weapon mounted light should, if anything, be a HUGE positive, because it meant the self-defender took their actions and self-preservation seriously.
And conversely: Denver shooter is evidence that the best equipment doesn't matter if you don't know and follow the law. But having good equipment while breaking the law doesn't matter. Either you break the law or you don't. If you murder someone with a Hi Point it's equally as illegal as if you murdered them with a gucci Glock.
When I started using them, once I got the feel for picking up the dot, my splits went down and my accuracy - particularly at range - went up.
I've always shot handguns with both eyes open and using the RDS gives me better accuracy with better awareness of what else is going on around me, since I don't have to focus so hard on the sights.
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not going to be the norm in a few more years. It's increased in popularity substantially in the past couple of years because of how effective they are. And effectiveness is something that every self-defender strives for, because your life may literally be on the line and every shot - especially that first one - really needs to count.
The RMR doesn't make his actions any more or less legal. A gun is still a gun and murder is still murder. The Glock 19 he used did not have any sort of laser features.
Kyle Rittenhouse had an RDS on his AR-15. Did you judge him negatively for that, too?
https://i.imgur.com/tiw2b4x.jpg - rough angles for where a laser and the bore of the handgun would be aimed.
It's a Trijicon RMR. You can tell by the profile on it. But it only projects a dot on the glass of the optic, not outwards onto the target. It's a very common option for concealed carry, and I use two handguns with reflex optics like this.
His Glock 19 also had a TRL-7 weapon mounted light on it. You can clearly see that. The TLR-8 has a laser on it, but generally lasers are not a popular option for concealed carriers.
I'm not sure what the OP is on about here but there was no laser anywhere. If people are insinuating that he used an RMR in order to increase his accuracy, that is the whole point - because every shot counts and you don't want to miss your target and hit an innocent bystander. Thousands of law abiding citizens use features like these on their handguns. Kyle Rittenhouse used an RDS on his AR-15 to judiciously defend his life without harming innocents.
This guy used his to break the law. But judge the man and his actions, not the gun and not the features of it.
https://i.imgur.com/l5vffZJ.png
This lady is nuts.