1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not the same person. Ears are different, eyes are narrower, chin is different.

2
brundlefly777 2 points ago +2 / -0

Newbies from Reddit (and vaxxed).

3
brundlefly777 3 points ago +3 / -0

We subsidize this shit? I knew their players don't make (relatively) much because of poor attendance, but I didn't know the league didn't turn a profit.

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the article:

To think that a committee can determine someone’s life is terrifying.

Heh. Remember the DEATH PANELS we were warned about years ago? Well, turns out they were real after all. Isn't it funny how that works?

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

If we found out the notion that both parties had access to Twitter personnel to delete unwanted posts turned out to be--oops! incorrect!--I wouldn't even bat an eye.

If they're alleging this, and if we know about the political leanings of Twitter's staff (what was it, 96% left-leaning?), they must be making an example of one solitary person who wanted to even the playing field, and taking this to mean both parties were equally equipped to "handle" things like this. What an embarrassing thing to try to get someone to believe.

32
brundlefly777 32 points ago +33 / -1

There's a 9/11 joke in there somewhere.

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Getting warmer.

Unfortunately, a more drastic punishment is the only way this problem goes away.

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't care, though. They're cut from the same cloth as the dems; all they have to do is keep taking it in the ass and they'll get their cut.

2
brundlefly777 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don't care that we know they're lying.

There is only one solution to this.

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is utter insanity. Hopefully one day every one of these fuckers is held to account. There will be many, many of them.

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't even think he erred. I took what he said to mean what we usually see referenced around here, that in the event of tyranny, or fraud, we reserve the right to abolish the Constitution and start anew. A radical notion, to be sure, but I don't think it was a slip-up. You think so?

2
brundlefly777 2 points ago +2 / -0

You seem to be the only other person in this thread who comprehends English. I'm dumbfounded at some of the things people in here are saying. It's doublespeak.

3
brundlefly777 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, at least we're on the same page as them.

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd bet real money that the only ones that do exist are from leftists.

-1
brundlefly777 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't have the tweet in front of me, but didn't he say it in the spirit of, to paraphrase, if you see fit, you can abolish this and start fresh, which is often cited when people are particularly pissed about government overreach? He did say it, as far as I remember.

Edit: I am fucking embarrassed that even TWO of you vegetables downvoted me. Did you even read what he said? He did say pretty much exactly what I said he did: https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/16ZX85Y40e/x/c/4TogdxPaBkH

Unreal, you guys. You'd have to be really fucking slow to read that and then see fit to COVER FOR HIM as if what he said was a bad thing. We have multiple levels of idiocy with you people, and I frankly don't know how it's even possible.

view more: Next ›