This you?
https://patriots.win/p/12hkOzIWIO/x/c/4Dx6DSkoHKA?d=50
You can not tell me the point of the teachings of Christ, too many people lie about that as it is. I am the second coming of Christ, in my new name. I know you will deny that for now/at first; it is still so. Do not even try with me; learn from me instead. I do not mean to offend you, however I know who I am.
He's so merciful he'll forgive even genocide, evidently, so long as you believe in him. If you don't, though, it doesn't matter how much good you did in life, you're being tortured, forever. He's so merciful, he genocided just about every creature on the planet (can't say I know how any plants would have survived, and how exactly did all the diseases get aboard the ark without everyone dying horribly?) instead of forgiving them, and being all-knowing, he should have known from the beginning this would happen.
Life of Brian has a much better message. A universal one. Hey, they're both fiction, anyway, so may as well follow the better one.
The church aren't scientists. Very anti-science, in fact.
Aren't you that guy who claimed to be Jesus here a while ago?
What made your god? Why is your god special? Why is your bible simply incorrect in every assertion it makes about the universe? Your god is an illogical, incoherent mess.
Ha, you know what your bible says about that?
For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.
It's hard to find objectively because, again, humans and chimps are VERY close so drawing one specific line is tricky (again, it's like pointing to where red becomes orange), but again, we have several very good candidates. I've heard about some quantum stuff (although I don't know much about that at all) where there is no such thing as an absolute nothing, with matter actually apparently popping into existence on that level. Regardless, things do point to an infinitely-dense (including space-time) singularity, which then effectively "always" existed, the rapid expansion of which then led to space-time as we understand it. "Before the universe" is an incoherent idea. Besides, if you're going to shrug it off and say "my god did it", then where did your god come from? If it was always there, then why couldn't the matter+energy of the universe have always existed instead? We can at least all agree that that exists. Even if it was a god, it's zero proof of your religion.
The specific one here hasn't been determined (and it's complicated to do, because we're really close to chimps), but we have several candidates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimpanzee%E2%80%93human_last_common_ancestor
Now prove there's any god, let alone your god.
Humans and chimps share a common ancestor, for one. For two, you simply do not understand what evolution is. You clearly haven't read.
ps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory_experiments_of_speciation
No, that's not evolution, for fuck's sake, READ.
Abiogenesis is nowhere near the level of proof we have for evolution, but it's a whole lot more solid than anything your bible proposes. Yes, things are examined from a naturalistic point of view because there is zero evidence of anything supernatural. There's as much proof of your god as for leprechauns or the tooth fairy. You need to prove there is a god before you can use it to explain anything, and even then it's not an explanation of what your god does to do anything. There definitively WAS NOT a worldwide flood, but we do have evidence there was a local flood around Iraq (you mention the Gilgamesh story, same area, but we actually have sediments that suggest a flood happened there, no need for any myths). I don't see how your rainbow shit does anything either.
I'm talking shit that you're implying like one species giving birth to another, not punctuated equilibrium. Fossils, and their ages, do show those chains, and those links are backed up by other lines of evidence as well. Read the link. What's your explanation for them? Sorry, faggot, but evolution is as close to a fact as it gets. At least you can cope by saying evolution is how your god came up with biodiversity, hey? And here's some speciation in the lab
We have observed speciation, many times, although, again, it's like picking where red becomes orange, not whatever you think it is. A rapid, sudden change would disprove evolution.
What authority? Just show the evidence. Come on. ANYTHING that disproves evolution.
That's all retarded. Seriously. It's probably the most challenged scientific idea around because of retarded christcucks, but it always holds up. Just fucking show something that'd disprove evolution, or even better, prove absolute retardation like creationism. Please.
I mean, if you're still unironically using GAW, it's probably correct
COUNTERFEITED TWENTY COUNTERFEITED TWENTY COUNTERFEITED TWENTY FOR A PACK OF SMOKES
If you have anything that would go against evolution, then you'd go down in history forever. But you don't. Nobody who's tried has anything.
Humans are apes, and your understanding is still completely wrong.
Is that a fucking pbj time floyd?
based
w e e d e a t e r
No, it's not. It's gradual change at the population level over many generations. There are countless examples of this happening in the fossil record.
What's the "epublican" stand for, then?