Yes, she was. They don’t need Trump tied himself to her, Trump is one of the best presidents in modern American history but the worst one on making allies and it makes those who blindly follow him look stupid
You’re right about business, I just think it’s really dumb to choose someone that even Trump kicked out over Tucker. And kinda shows a bit of left-wing agenda on the MAGA community, since Tucker always have criticized both sides
Here’s a link to NYP because if someone fro the left says the sky is blue it means it’s green, right?
Ok, tell me at which point he isn't conservative? I even think he is too much conservative and why in the hell a conservative voice in the MSM would be bad?
Looks like the crazy senseless arguments arrived on the right already
I agree and I even consider myself a libertarian (on thought not very close to the party) to be fair the core of the party has become very different from the movement, take as an example Amash's standards. I think u/ThomasGiferson was perfect in his point they really need to get rid of the socialists
Yeah, it's very dumb to get a degree in Harvard to make an average of 81k* that’s Joe's average where I live
In case someone wants to read their BS: https://rsf.org/en/united-states
Well, with the AVAILABLE data Sweden has higher deaths per million than the US ( https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-covid-deaths-per-million?tab=chart&country=OWID_WRL+GBR+USA+CHE+NOR+SWE+TWN+ISL )
Use Sweden doesn’t prove anything for any side, it just makes the right look as dumb as the left
She doesn’t get tested FOR COVID 19, and she went to the hospital on March 22 there weren’t cases enough at that point to overload the hospitals.
The right is really being hypocritical for using Sweden as a source, we are saying that the US test rate (18.82 tests per 1k people) isn’t enough to prove the left point, that we need a strong lockdown and tyrannical measures, but some are using the Sweden test rate (11.8 tests per 1k people) to prove a point. Source: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/full-list-cumulative-total-tests-per-thousand?year=2020-05-01&time=latest&country=AUT+BEL+CZE+DNK+EST+FIN+FRA+DEU+ISL+IRL+ITA+LUX+NLD+NOR+PRT+SVK+KOR+ESP+SWE+CHE+TWN+TUR+GBR+USA+VNM
I fully agree that the lockdown doesn’t seem to be working and is reaching high levels of craziness, but I would not use Sweden as a reliable source they don't have trustable data. A friend's mom who lives in Sweden got sick with COVID19 symptoms, spend 4 days at the hospital, is doing good at home now, and never got tested
The reactor building roof is very heavy like hundreds of tons and the explosion was able to launch it far in the air, so you would have to put the reactor very far underground what would make things much worse since the radiation would contaminate all the soil and water in a much bigger scale.
The safest way to produce nuclear energy today would be using a molten salt reactor, where the nuclear reaction just stops by itself in case of a meltdown, we started to study this type of reactor in the 50s, imagine how further we would be today if we haven't stopped, but because of the "green" agenda will still using very old technology
First, it would be way more expensive. Second, the major problem during a complete meltdown is not what is going up, but what is going down, the melted mass penetrating the soil because of its heat (something around 3600F°) so put things underground will not help that much.
A good example of this is Chernobyl where they have to build a mine under the power plant and fill it up with concrete, so that mass doesn't hit the soil
Did I said he isn’t?