5
carlodagunz 5 points ago +5 / -0

They would create a martyr and they would absolutely get reamed by the military. Marines in particular, there is no fighting force in the country

2
carlodagunz 2 points ago +2 / -0

He'll be in Texas, fulfilling his duties as Commander-in-Chief

16
carlodagunz 16 points ago +16 / -0

I think if Trump and the military are setting things into motion, she is just as in the dark as the rest of us, and that should terrify anyone in her position.

2
carlodagunz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me either, but I think if he does have one, the DNI report is the stuka siren preluding the actual drop.

2
carlodagunz 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, I think it's a trap. They won't run if they don't feel threatened, if they think they've won.

7
carlodagunz 7 points ago +7 / -0

If this is a sign that the military is awaiting orders from the Commander-in-Chief, and I will be honest I have my doubts, it would mean that Trump said to go home because he doesn't want pedes to be in the potential crossfire between the alphabet boys and the soldiery.

There is a remote possibility that Pence is not actually a traitor, but is instead performing a necessary and vital duty to the GEOTUS and to the nation in remaining in place to preside over the counting. It seems possible to me that he's taking the L because he is required by the Constitution to do so. I'm not gonna get my hopes up, and I would advise against taking what I'm about to say as gospel, but I'd like you all to hear me out.

yet Pence had only the faintest of smiles and looked oddly grim. In response to this pede, if Pence is still, against the odds, on our side, he is currently in a position that he knows a lot of disillusioned Americans will hate him for. If I had to preside over this sham of an election and I did not have the constitutional power (I made a thread on Article 2 a few months back talking about the extent of that power) to reject those fraudulent electors, the last thing I would be doing is smiling.

Not least when faced with congress being in complete control by people who want to build a list of Trump's supporters so that they can be 'held accountable' for electing him. I would not be happy at all about even appearing to surrender our country to something so reprehensible. But I would fulfill that constitutional obligation at my own peril if I believed that it would ensure all the congressmen would be in the same place when all of their dirty laundry is aired out in front of God and everyone.

Make whatever preparations you must in case things really are as grim as they appear, but try not to lose hope just yet. Remember: It's always darkest before the dawn.

12
carlodagunz 12 points ago +13 / -1

Fuck it. I'm an unemployed nobody living in bumfuck nowhere, but maybe I should run for president.

1
carlodagunz 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's basically saying Warnock lied to people by omission, not accurately representing his platform and having far-left political biases.

AKA Wow, it's fucking nothing.

6
carlodagunz 6 points ago +7 / -1

One of the low-key coolest things about it is the guitarist is 331Erock. You might like to look him up sometime, he's done a shitload of rock covers. Everything from oldschool vidya, to TV shows, to god knows what else.

3
carlodagunz 3 points ago +5 / -2

It's possible, but Trump wouldn't send a bunch of troops into a pointless meat grinder anyway. He's smart enough to give Iran the Serbia treatment and be done with it if Iran was actually involved. Which is to say, strategically cripple the Iranian infrastructure and industrial capabilities and let Iran's enemies take care of the rest.

1
carlodagunz 1 point ago +1 / -0

The district attorney said he only mentioned the party affiliation because of multiple conspiracy theories circulating about voter fraud, adding that this is the only case during this election that his office has encountered.

The rest, as we all know, were perpetrated by the people who sign his paycheck.

2
carlodagunz 2 points ago +2 / -0

My stepfather caught it, and that's been pretty much what I've heard so far.

2
carlodagunz 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, but objections may be filed and if they are signed by at least one senator and one representative, it SHALL be deliberated upon before the electoral votes of that state are acted upon.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›