4
chaletschuss3467 4 points ago +4 / -0

could it be it's just not wide spread enough, or maybe media suppression of adverse reactions? handling is an interesting point too.

6
chaletschuss3467 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's very disappointing and concerning if true. Hope it's a false report. We need the EO

1
chaletschuss3467 1 point ago +1 / -0

only consolation there is apparently adverse reactions are worse in younger - immune systems are stronger so generate a stronger response. But then vaccine is less effective for elderly. not talking about long term effects - no one knows

1
chaletschuss3467 1 point ago +1 / -0

sadly there are a lot of great, highly reputable ones (look at how many signed the Barrington declaration) who are against all of this but because they don't fit the narrative they are silenced

22
chaletschuss3467 22 points ago +22 / -0

So far I've heard of 4 nurses with anaphylactic reactions after the vaccine. One in Alaska yesterday had to stay the night in ICU and had to have several shots of epinephrine, first two weren't enough. She had no previous allergies

1
chaletschuss3467 1 point ago +1 / -0

as much as Trump praises the vaccine development (I feel he mostly does this to shove it to the left) this is ALL on the pharmaceutical companies and FDA approval. It is their responsibility alone to ensure a safe product, and communicate transparent results and risks. If they couldn't develop a safe vaccine within a certain time frame, it would have been their responsibility to communicate as such. I hope people will understand that (but they won't and will blame Trump). This is all driven by insane media fear mongering, and stupidity.

19
chaletschuss3467 19 points ago +19 / -0

they claimed she frequently faints - can you actually be a frequently fainting nurse? How could you do the job without harming patients - fainting in the middle of a procedure?

3
chaletschuss3467 3 points ago +3 / -0

Apparently they claimed the nurse often faints - is it possible to be a frequently fainting nurse? You just randomly faint throughout the day as administering injections, meds, transferring patients etc? Sounds safe. Just curious

21
chaletschuss3467 21 points ago +21 / -0

You don't have to be anti vax to not trust a rushed vaccine using a new technology that only has 2 months of phase 3 trials. Many highly renowned doctors around the world have expressed serious concern. There are simply too many unknowns. And the stupidity of it all - while full study data isn't available yet to public (unless it has recently been released) - it appears upwards of 60% of younger individuals (under age 56 I think) experience symptoms, and some very severe (I have read several accounts (in MSM as well) of fevers over 105 (that is considered a dangerously high fever). Last I read over 15% experienced severe adverse effects. So all this for a cold that is asymptomatic for 80%. So 60% get symptoms with vaccine, but 80% get no symptoms with covid. The fuck

2
chaletschuss3467 2 points ago +2 / -0

So organized! I have a whole bunch saved - all stashed in one open file - yikes! Gotta step up my game!

15
chaletschuss3467 15 points ago +15 / -0

Isn't it just disgusting to think how we thought we lived in a democracy, but it's all been an illusion? And to see the consequences of it - aka rat infested democrat cities that have serious, horrific implications for millions of lives.

12
chaletschuss3467 12 points ago +12 / -0

I agree he's likely exhausting every option first. But just pray he actually does use the EO and soon. I know SCOTUS cases are still docketed, but at this point I don't think much will come of them. If there was foreign interference in the election, can he not act at the same time with the EO and SCOTUS cases? Just wish he would do this now.

0
chaletschuss3467 0 points ago +1 / -1

things have been relatively slow since Monday. Hope something happens soon

2
chaletschuss3467 2 points ago +2 / -0

Things have been slow since Monday. Any guesses when some action will start again? When are the SCOTUS hearings? When would we see some action from the EO (I know probably after the 18th)?

9
chaletschuss3467 9 points ago +9 / -0

where has it been released?

3
chaletschuss3467 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah it's important people understand this. Otherwise on the 18th we're going to have so many doomers again. This should be higher, or stickied or something, I feel like a lot of people are going to be deflated on the 18th and want to give up - which we can't!

4
chaletschuss3467 4 points ago +4 / -0

With regards to the EO and the Dec 18 date (I know it may not be directly related to this post - or may have a link dunno) - just want to clarify, Trump doesn't have to act by the 18th but just needs the report filed by the 18th? So if we don't hear on the 18th it's ok?

2
chaletschuss3467 2 points ago +2 / -0

shocking, absolutely shocking

2
chaletschuss3467 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. One (of the MANY) things that's great about MAGA - we drop betrayers instantly and don't make excuses for them or hide behind biases. Just like how we dealt with Fox.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›