1
chez_blunts 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think at the very least we need to take the Democrat party back from the leftists that hijacked it and make it "normal" again.

2
chez_blunts 2 points ago +3 / -1

Neither are black students because black isn't a color. Ironically, white is considered a color because white light comprises all hues on the visible light spectrum.

-2
chez_blunts -2 points ago +1 / -3

I've never made any rants in other people's posts in direct response to the OP.

-2
chez_blunts -2 points ago +1 / -3

I'm pretty sure you're argument trolling, but whatever.

First of all, water isn't wet. (I'm serious. Look it up). More importantly, if you're referring to my post titled "Story DOES NOT MATTER, (1) did you actually watch the video, and (2) did you notice that the title of the post was the title of the video? I doubt you watched the video because everything you're trying to argue was addressed in the video. Lastly, "video game stories don't matter" (which also isn't something I said verbatim) is a generalization because the subject of the statement, "stories" (or more specifically, "video game stories" since, in that sentence, "video game" is an adjective that modifies the noun, "stories.") Given that that statement is a generalization, and every generalization has exceptions, it's not necessary to include the phrase "not all" in that statement. In addition, you wouldn't use the determiner "some" unless you're referring to the exception of a generalization. It wouldn't make sense to say, "some people have ten fingers," when the majority of people have ten fingers, and either people who have more than ten fingers or people who have less than ten fingers are the exception.

Now, if you continue arguing with me about this, I'm going to assume you're an argument troll and I won't respond.

0
chez_blunts 0 points ago +1 / -1
  1. Epstein didn't kill himself
-5
chez_blunts -5 points ago +1 / -6

Are you trolling, or are you really just stupid and lack common sense.

It's unnecessary to "add context" by saying "not all games" when it's implied by the absence of the word "all" which YOU added in order to create a strawman argument. Why would you assume I meant all games when I didn't say "all games"? Plus, it's already explained in the video I posted, and I mentioned repeatedly that there are exceptions. Read an entire post or watch an entire video before you comment.

-4
chez_blunts -4 points ago +1 / -5

Do you understand that pointing out exceptions to the rule doesn't prove the rule to be wrong? Just your pointing out games that are exceptions to the premise I presented doesn't prove me or my premise wrong at all. It's like me saying "most fish lay eggs." Then you say, "great white sharks are fish. They don't lay eggs." How exactly does that prove the premise that most fish lay eggs wrong?

-4
chez_blunts -4 points ago +1 / -5

The comments I deleted were comments in my own posts not other people's. I don't start arguments.

-4
chez_blunts -4 points ago +1 / -5

Name 5 posts I've gone into and given butthurt rants in that I disagreed with. You won't find any because I tend not to comment on posts I disagree with.

-4
chez_blunts -4 points ago +1 / -5

Are you able to argue my point of view without misrepresenting it? Are you able to understand where I'm coming from Yes or no?

And by the way, I'm trying to fucking block people so I don't have to see their comments anymore, but that doesn't fucking work!

-2
chez_blunts -2 points ago +1 / -3

Is there any point where you can say, "I can see your point of view and I understand where you're coming from," or are you just going to keep arguing with me no matter what? Because if it's the latter, we're done here.

-3
chez_blunts -3 points ago +1 / -4

Meaningingful discussion doesn't mean a debate or argument. Sometimes I want to have a meaningful discussion with people who agree with my premise, but for different reasons. For example, "Why do you love Trump?" is meant to start a meaningful discussion on why people love Trump. It's not meant for people who don't like Trump to come in and debate why they don't like Trump. That's not a meaningful discussion. That's starting an argument.

-3
chez_blunts -3 points ago +1 / -4

We're going in circles. You're just arguing because you get off on it. We're done here. You're like my ex girlfriend. And it's possible for people to have somewhat private conversations in a public forum such as a park. Would you go up to a group of people in a public park and call them retards while spouting your opinion no one asked for? Are you really that socially retarded and inappropriate. What if you were with your wife or girlfriend in a public setting, and I went up to you and said, "she's ugly, you should dump her." Would that be appropriate? We're in a public setting after all. You don't seem to understand that just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. Watch Jurassic Park.

-3
chez_blunts -3 points ago +1 / -4

What are the games mentioned in the video?! You didn't even fucking watch it! I asked you that question to see if you did your homework, which you obviously didn't. You're not responding to anything, you're just injecting your off topic opinions. Do your fucking homework. "Do the reading". Then you can come back and join the discussion. Stop being a fucking contrarian all the fucking time it's so tiring. Stop fucking starting off topic arguments about everything. It's so fucking tiring.

-3
chez_blunts -3 points ago +1 / -4

Fine, then some of my posts are public forums for people who share my thoughts.

-3
chez_blunts -3 points ago +1 / -4

Suppose you were having a conversation with a group of people, in a public setting, discussing a topic you all agreed on. Then some other people overhear you, go over to where your group is, call you retarded and start going off on how stupid your conversation is, would you find that acceptable behavior?

-2
chez_blunts -2 points ago +1 / -3

This isn't a public forum though. Otherwise, being a Trump supporter wouldn't be a rule, and leftists would be allowed to post here.

And you have plenty of reasons not to interact with posts.

view more: Next ›