1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will do the same. Anyone know of conservative payment processors for donations?

1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't want to. It's horrible here. Do NOT come here. There are bears. You do not want to move here. stay out. go away. maximum occupancy reached. Sorry. Go home.

1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not in SF, but I've been building webscrapers for different companies for a few years now, have Experience with Python, AWS, Elasticsearch, etc. How can I help?

2
christopherroos 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nevada: 6 Arizona: 11 New Mexico: 5 Wisconsin: 10 Michigan: 16 Pennsylvania: 20 Georgia: 16 Total: 84

1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

Keep that as cash, son. Don't put money you might need in the next 6 weeks in stocks.

5
christopherroos 5 points ago +5 / -0

same boat. Not religious at all, was born Mormon, quit halfway through my Mission.

Really miss the community, just tired of talking about the end of times and things like that.

2
christopherroos 2 points ago +2 / -0

My communist sister chooses not to work, despite having no kids. Her husband is the bread winner, she is a mooch. What are men supposed to do if their wives decide not to work? How are men supposed to step it up? And why is doing paid work considered better, if your paycheck just goes to support the "unpaid" woman?

-1
christopherroos -1 points ago +1 / -2

Dr. Shiva's "No Cheating Detected" Graph has several data points with negative Trump votes.

His Y axis is calculated a negative x plus or minus the %of indivudal votes he got.

if you remember, y = mx + b, y = -x + b has a slope of -1. the downward slope is to always be expected.

He is hiding fraud, not exposing it, my friends. If you saw a graph with Negative Trump votes, that should have been the first thing you mention, not the downward slope that is exactly what you would expect in a graph like this.

1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you think that there is more fraud in Oakland County than in Wayne County? You think there is no obvious fraud in the Wayne county graph, compared to the other counties?

1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

an 8 year old video I didn't know I had, that I made of my sister pretending to be me when she was 6 and I was 15, don't judge me for what I did with my Youtube account when I was a child.

1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm aware that it can be above the line. As I show, there is an upper bound and a lower bound. my point is, at the far right, Trump cannot get a positive value. at the far left, Trump cannot get a negative value. at Republicans getting 60%, Trump cannot be more than +40%, and cannot be less than -60%. at 70%, Trump cannot be more than +30%, and cannot be less than -70%. at 80%, Trump cannot be be higher than +20, and cannot be lower than -80%. at 90% Trump cannot be higher than +10%, and cannot be lower than -90%. at 100%, Trump cannot be higher than +0%, and cannot be lower than -100%.

There are numbers that are impossible in that graph. Republicans got 5% of the vote. that means that the highest Trump can get is +95%. the lowest Trump can get is -5%, because that would be 0%. But he has -20%. that means his % of the individual ballots is -15%.

The normal graph has the most fraudulent shit on it.

1
christopherroos 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Republicans get 100% of the vote, and Trump gets 100% of the vote, the maximum possible, they can only get to 0. 100% - 100% = 0. If there is a single individual ballot that goes for Biden, in the precinct, it will be negative. The Line always slopes down. Upward Slope is impossible. it can only be straight or downward.

0
christopherroos 0 points ago +1 / -1

Okay: so to make it clearer:

% of Individual votes for Trump goes from 0-100. % of Straight party votes for Republicans goes from 0-100.

the x-axis = % of Straight party votes for Republicans the y-axis = % of Individual votes for Trump minus % of Straight party votes for Republicans

So if the x-axis = 5%, and the y-axis = -20%, to get the %of Individual Votes for Trump is -15%, which is impossible.

If you have 90% Trump Straight Voters, and 60% Trump Individual voters, that is a +30, not a -30, because Trump outperformed the party.

0
christopherroos 0 points ago +1 / -1

Incorrect. that math is x - individual votes, not individual votes - x. If 25% of single candidate voters voted for trump, that would be a +20, not a -20.

0
christopherroos 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, I do get that. So we are looking the difference between straight party vote vs individual candidates.

Let's undue the subtraction to get the percentage for Trump, okay? So we take that 5%, and add it to the -20%. that's -15%. how Does Trump get to -15% of the in individual vote???

-1
christopherroos -1 points ago +1 / -2

If Republicans get 5% of the vote, and Trump underperforms them by 20%, how many Votes did Trump get?

view more: Next ›