I have no doubt he will improve next debate
If there is one. Look for the Dems, mainstream media, and the tech tyrants to float whatever version of "orange man bad" to weasel out of the next debate.
I hope you voted for Republicans down the whole ticket --Senate and especially the House.
When you dress someone down and then use the phrase "...so don't tell me about some ________ " (< their bullshit claim) is called: Not Taking Shit From Anyone.
Calling bullshit is what many people appreciate. There are some fence-sitters that will talk about style this/that, but if you watch this clip (and since neither Wallace or Biden is interrupting the President), he is literally stomping a hole in Biden's ass.
his image as a no-nonsense roll up your sleeve Pennsylvanian steel worker
Never was that. You did say "image".
I agree.
He should have said that its racist because it continues to pit the race against each other and that's wrong.
He did later add that CRT is really about tearing down America (and that is what it's about too) and he said he wouldn't stand for it.
Overall...
Joe looked hapless and it was obvious that a) they definitely have shifted his schedule, b) he was totally coached to go back to: insults, say "that's a lie" or "debunked", and c) he had maybe 6 areas where he was able to remember. It was a tad less obvious that he was jacked up on meds, though a) his eyes looked different and b) him refusing to take a drug test before/after the debate makes that more suspicious.
I think most people will continue to complain and cite Trumps style, but they heard him state his case and, sadly he had to pound home his points over two voices, which was sad, but like Trump said, "no surprising".
And, look, here's the deal on Trump that the voter will remember:
- He is opening our country back up
- He brought jobs back to the US, including manufacturing (which was considered a "write off"/lost cause by Obama & Biden)
- He delivered the highest rates of employment our country has seen in 50+ years
- he delivered the lowest unemployment for racial groups that always claim to get the shaft
- He delivered a booming economy
- He handled a shitstorm called COVID well and he outlined a 4-phase approach that many states are using to open back up and handle the remaining impacts (Joe said he didn't have a plan, but it was literally announced at one of the famed evening pressers)
- He has started to deliver a booming economy again
- He can bring peace in the streets,
- He deescalated North Korea
- He is bringing peace (maybe not Peace...yet) in the Middle East
- He hasn't spilled the blood of our brave men and women for no reason or to serve selfish interests of warhawks
- He is currently bringing the cost of prescriptions down
I mean, WE might know all the things that he is doing and done, but ^ those facts are real and Trump delivered. And they are undeniable and Trump stated most of that tonight. Any statement to the contrary is a lie. Period.
It's scary to think about some of the statements Biden made.
For example, Biden literally said this, "We can't address opening the economy until after we handle COVID". This is stunningly dumb and lacks any grasp on non linear management, which is exactly what Trump (and any good executive) has to excel at to get shit done. I struggle to even find the words of how categorically stupid this statement is and I can't even believe he would say that (but it was part of his "COVID-Bad-Trump-Kill-People-Trump-Bad" memorization coaching).
On the style, it might have felt like a yelling match, but, on the facts, on the deliverables, and on the ability to manage the hectic job of being President, Joe Biden is thoroughly disqualified of being the leader of this country.
Trump says, "Sure" twice.
Wallace asked if he would tell "them" to "stand down". Trump was already off running to denounce the left. Wallace repeated the request, Trump asked for a name, Wallace said "proud boys", and Trump said, "Sure. Proud Boys Stand by and Stand down" (effectively trying to repeat the request that Wallace expressly made in his question a few moments earlier and slightly getting it wrong). Wallace asked Trump "Will you tell them to 'stand down'", so Trump didn't come up with "Stand down/stand by" by himself.
The "them" part is weird because Chris Wallace said "white Supremists AND militias. Militas are protected under the Constitution and Wallace seems to be (well doing what the democrat-party sellouts do) and that's conflate a legal, constitutional right with "white supremacy".
Honestly, I think Trump was already ready to rip into the left violence and might have missed that, but it's definitely a loaded/double-meaning question that Wallace was trying to pull.
“No one has established vote fraud is real”
In response to Wallace (asking him to condem) I thought he said “sure, yes, stand down” and then he launched into Antifa.
That’s what Joe calls “leadership”.
Wait until the next debate (if there is one).
Tacking to the top... Here is the recap (so far)
- The Judge read the entire amicus brief (from the person he asked be appointed to represent him)
- The Judge wants to find a way (anyway) to proceed with a conviction on his own
- The Judge is a sexist scumbag who mistreats Sidney Powell at any chance (barely even refer to her by her given name)
- When Sidney Powell did get her chance; the Judge drilled her about any/all contact with the president and was trying to "investigate" for improrpriety
- Sidney Powell made a motion of recusal; Judge Fuckface invited it; Powell said she'll file it right now
- The Judge wants to find any way to delay this process
- The Judge specifically was asking about preserving the case (dismissing without prejudice) so that "a prosecutor or a new Attorney General can pursue these charges in the future"
- He questions the President's tweets, but doesn't know how Twitter even works
- He's looking for any possible way to infer or imply the President has influenced the DOJ to take this action (he's asked various lines of questions along this same line for nearly 2 hours).
- The DOJ reps have iterated, reiterated, and emphasize this... "They can't support the prosecution because of major problems with the evidence presented".
- As soon as the defense filed a motion to remove the plea, the DOJ tried to figure out how to move forward with a prosecution and they couldn't".
- The judge lets the Amicus (this Gleeson asshole) drone on an on; allows accusations, filled with invective to go on and on; he quotes media commentary; he implies impropriety for the President tweeting about the Flynn case and twist that these tweets are the basis that the DOJ is being unduly influenced to reconsider the case.
- Gleeson cites the president's "tone of his tweets" as a disrespect to the FBI, the DOJ, and the rule of law.
- Gleeson states that "Bill Barr has yielded to the President's pressure" and the judge didn't even ask any questions to support those statements.
- Gleeson nuzzles up the judge's bunghole and reinforces the (FALSE) notion that the judge can do whatever he wants because the Judiciary has power too
- Gleeson accuses all the current prosecutors of acting without proper precedent
- Gleeson has used the phrase "to my mind" (at this typing) six times; so he's opining, not citing case law
- Gleeson has stated four times "you don't have to dismiss just because the defendant has friends in high places".
- Gleeson misrepresents the foundations of this case (grossly, imo). (He misstates that Flynn lied to FBI lied. He is citing and conflating statements about expulsions vs sanctions THREE times, on different occasions). Judge does not correct, inquire or ask for clarification.
- Gleeson has assumed the role of the prosecution; his tenor and tone alone shows the he is advocating the PRIOR CASE that VanGrack and the now-known to be dirty prosecutors said
- And, to cap off this bullshit hearing, Gleeson rehashes actually debunked Spygate claims
The judge is a globalist.
The judge is a cuck.
The judge is compromised.
There. That's the recap.
Do the crime. Do the time.
Fuck around. Find out.
It amazes me how really stupid (and evil) these people are. I do feel for Andy --these people are unhinged and he is in danger.
Here is Periscope link t: https://www.pscp.tv/w/1vAxRrBMoeZxl#
Judge Sullivan is DRONING on, setting some sort of foundation to screw Flynn (again), abuse his power (again), etc, etc, etc... It's all so tiring.
He's a comedian that vigorous did blackface and he's also a serious journalist?
GTFOH!
Pede... first, I think you need to back up a bit and take a break from the personal attacks. I don't have any substance abuse issues and I am a small government advocate. You trying to arm-chair diagnose & label me is gross, and setting up a (weak) strawman is the kind of shit that libs do.
Further, I directly mentioned the connection to left wing politics. It is absolutely playing a big part in these two city's observable decline in quality of life and, yes, it is also juxtaposed to the rise of legal weed. I didn't say "weed has rued the day!!!", so stop with that.
And, I have seen this with my eyes through my business over the last 25+ years. I had contracts in/around Portland dating back to the mid/late 90s and my Denver contracts date to the mid/late 2000s. BOTH cities have gone to shit. BOTH cities have legal weed. BOTH cities have marxist/commie mayors. But BOTH cities have gone to shit shortly after either/both have occurred. My clients that I work(ed) with in the cities have left (many of whom were life-long residents and several of them copious cannabis smokers too). My employees (men and women; straight-laced and not) used to love going to both cities, but now prefer to work with these clients remotely.
You can continue to call me names and otherwise imply things I'm not (which is really uncool); or, you can take 25 years of observation, the last 10 years of negative impact to my business, and what might be nuanced position that blends both poor leadership and (perhaps) too-widely available weed. You saying that "legal weed has no impact" is as stupid as the argument the "legal alcohol has no impact" (which is an argument that I NEVER made).
Though I agree with the free market sentiments of your post...
... do you find it curious that these two state's highest population and economic centers (Portland and Denver, respectively) are visible BOILING POTS OF SOCIALIST PUS?
They both have always been pretty liberal (as many metropolitan areas are), but since legalization and decriminalization has occurred, these cities have gone to shit. I stopped doing business in Portland years ago and am currently doing the same in Denver. Even before the China Flu hit, several of my team members did not want to go to Denver anymore (one even thought of moving there to work on the contracts we had; but "noped" out over the last few years).
I know correlation isn't causation, but there is a clear correlation that these cities have gone to shit --the homelessness has gone up, the non-violent has gone up, the violent crime has gone up, etc. These are not the things that decriminalization of weed promises.
It seems clear that these cities also have communist mayors too. So maybe that's the cause, but these are not "nice" cities anymore.
I do think we need to make hemp and cannabis part of our economy, but as I have directly observed these changes, I lean towards medically legal and a decriminalization approach that has a "chamber of commerce" element to it.
Look, if I'm sitting at a park with my kids or at an outdoor cafe having a coffee/dinner, the last thing I want is someone (or what's more often a pack) of people having a smokefest. And that happens ALOT in these cities. Stoners can be dicks too (even if they are too stoned to know the difference because "they high", it doesn't make it ok).
But, yeah, I know, I'm probably harshing your mellow. Sorry Pede.
Hold open hearings and declass all the known evidence AND demand prosecution everyday until the DOJ acts; or, SHUT. THE. FUCK. UP!
Well, the DC mayor's mask mandate has an exception for federal elected officials (Representatives and Senators), so technically (which is always the weasel way with democrats) she's neither breaking the mandate nor being hypocritical.
And that is a full-written out "Rules for Thee"...it's worse than the normal ignoring of the rules.
"It's a thorough-debunk conspiracy" [while citing no evidence of debunking and video evidence showing the crimes]
Sadly this quote might come from CNN or the Director of the F.B.I.
Doesn't mean that the Dems still won't steal the election in other key states (MI, WI, PA).
And, with the mainstream and social media tech tyrants running cover, nothing will probably happen. Especially with Bill Barr at DOJ...complete waste of space.
No just imagine if he was the black digital assistant to Joe Biden?
The left would be burning down cities, I bet.
Oh, yeah, they already do that and over: a drugged-up meth head; a co-conspirator to a known drug dealer; and, a rapist that was kidnapping some kids, but you know, I digress.
CNN: Professor claims, "Judge Barrett raped me. I fear her to this day. It's burned into my medulla oblongata"
Well, IF Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed and IF she is indeed "conservative", the advantage is only 5-4...
BECAUSE
JOHN ROBERTS IS COMPROMISED!!!
Juanita with the bantz!!!
Donchaknow... he says he's the "Scranton Kid".
For Democrats, they say stuff and then it's reality, when it's not. Some examples.
So, when Joe says "I'm a tri-gendered immigrant steelworker with three law degrees and has been to the moon", most of the media will nod their heads in agreement and then say "oRanGe MaN BaD".