48
cicicicico 48 points ago +53 / -5

But did you see the video where Cruz absolutely destroys X?

4
cicicicico 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yea right. The money would just be used in the general slush fund. Just like the equifax settlment. Like 1% is left for the victims. Dont give the gov an excuse to steal more money.

6
cicicicico 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lets hope atlanta.

2
cicicicico 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its not even fetuses in the vaccines either. Its fetal derived cells. It WAS from an aborted fetus like 40 years ago, but theyve just been growing those cells in petri dishes since. Not that I will ever take this vaccine.

Not taking vaccines because originally they were from fetuses is like not utilizing any breakthroughs in science that were the result of unethical practices. Like should we just ignore what was learned through the stanford prison experiment just because the original act was unethical?

5
cicicicico 5 points ago +5 / -0

I dont know why the government has seized this power for itself. Why do they manage licenses for things like alcohol or even just trades. Its my own damn business if I want to hire an electrician who is not licensed. This kind of thing should be controlled by a private company who puts their name behind someone. Just like UL listings.

3
cicicicico 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually on her facebook she took a picture of this and said it wasnt her.

27
cicicicico 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yes it seems they are identifying as "New California" and "New Nevada" essentially saying california and nevada are so corrupt that it doesnt even represent us.

6
cicicicico 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hes still a ghost coast dense giver

1
cicicicico 1 point ago +1 / -0

No idea. Gotta say that my understanding of the politics of various fast food merchants seems to be lacking.

1
cicicicico 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shiiit did not know this. Only option is chicky chick then?

4
cicicicico 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm worried because people seem excited at the prospect. I dont think people understand how horrible this would be.

Im not even sure if this is conspiratorial anymore, but I think china has been funneling funding and narrative advancement in a direction to support civil strife. Their interests align with us having a civil war because they know thats the only way they can win a war with us.

1
cicicicico 1 point ago +1 / -0

The libertarian in me would agree with you. Im not really sure there is a principled argument against that. I think someone could make the national security argument but thats a very dangerous precedent.

15
cicicicico 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is what the chinese want. If there is ever a civil war, they will send their support to whatever side aligns with their interests. It happens all the time in civil wars. There is no way there would be no international involvement. It would be bad. Really bad.

by Bullelk
13
cicicicico 13 points ago +13 / -0

Is the supreme court reading the twitter threads? Id imagine the 'support' wont be considered unless they add their name to the suit or write something more formal. Which brings me to why is he saying 'support' but nothing concrete?

5
cicicicico 5 points ago +6 / -1

That cant really work in reality. That would mean bidenbros could come brigade here and there would be nothing we could do. Its really more complicated than just making a law that says no censorship because you have to let a website retain the right to curate a certain community but at the same time not let a few bad actors control the entire narrative.

view more: Next ›