Or he knows exactly who the (illegitimately installed) president is, and it's (she's) not him.
Bill Gates said he is working on a "final solution".. https://www.worldviewweekend.com/news/article/forced-masking-america-paving-way-bill-gates-final-solution
President Putin vs Potatus Biden. Only one of these is legitimately in charge of his country.
Well, it lines up with the recent changes in the DoD...
Pfizer-Extorta should be the name of their company.
I believe this white rose movement is named after the anti-Nazi white rose nonviolent student movement in Germany during the 3rd Reich.
Is the person overweight or is her arm swollen from the jab?
link please?
Perhaps they know something.
As an aside, in China, they use the Sinovac, not the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine.
Interesting that the presumably top workers in the medical field in their country may think something is up with this worldwide vaccination scheme?
Hopefully she has "daddy issues" and does the opposite to spite him!
Several reasons I could think of briefly:
It has emergency use authorization not final approval. This means it is a stopgap measure and is somewhat of an experimental medicine.
Going further down this line of argumentation, it is a violation of the Nuremberg laws (international law) to coerce people to participate in human experimentation. Any form of coercion is a violation. Including that related to employment. https://ahrp.org/1964-wma-assembly-approves-the-declaration-of-helsinki/ http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
Of course, the US federal government is immune from prosecution under its own laws, and refuses to be bound by any international court. That said, by appealing to Nuremberg rules, you are saying a higher, universal form of law should be applied. After all, national laws have served as the basis for democides & genocides in countless countries in the 20th century, which were clearly not legal under natural law.
Covid vaccine is a gene therapy. (I think, you would have to research this a bit more. Look at the actual patents, documents, etc.) https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/83947/covid-mrna-vaccines-are-a-form-of-gene-therapy https://www.wired.com/story/why-its-a-big-deal-if-the-first-covid-vaccine-is-genetic/
See also this: https://www.sott.net/article/448927-What-Moderna-isnt-telling-us-about-their-new-mRNA-COVID-19-vaccine And this: http://enformtk.u-aizu.ac.jp/howard/gcep_dr_vanessa_schmidt_krueger/
Because it is a gene therapy, it alters genetic information. Discriminating based on genetic information is prohibited by federal law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_Information_Nondiscrimination_Act https://www.eeoc.gov/genetic-information-discrimination
Arguably, the virus also alters your DNA, and they can't discriminate based on that either. See here for more about viruses and DNA. https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/viruses-could-epigenetically-modify-a-persons-dna/ https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-viruses-that-shaped-our-dna-11584124275 https://www.preventdisease.com/news/12/080712_Scientists-Without-Foresight-Are-Using-Viruses-To-Alter-Human-DNA.shtml https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161128151050.htm
Companies manufacturing the vaccine have no liability (this is more a political argument).
You would have to look in his contract.
They may be able to require the vaccine, but they are also required to offer "reasonable accommodations" if he has a medical or religious contraindication.
If he is from a religion that prohibits the consumption of certain products (and can reasonably prove this, such as a letter from a priest, tithing, etc) - some covid vaccines are made with cell lines obtained as a result of abortions, that could be a way out. Or if he has a pastor who thinks it is the Mark of the Beast or a component thereof, he should be able to opt out.
They could offer a different position or method of interacting with the public, such as work from home or work in an isolated office. Or give him a higher-filtration mask such as N100/HEPA mask.
If he has sympathetic coworkers, they could sign some form of legal document which says they agree to the risks of working with an unvaccinated person.
If the vaccine requirement is related to continuity of government, he may not be able to opt out because it is a "national security" issue, Congress also received the shots apparently.
If the reason for the requirement is to protect others (similarly to how the mask thing was argued), that has not been adequately studied and it is not known whether vaccinated individuals can be carriers.
It would probably be harder to argue against it if he has a choice between vaccines (for example, if he can use a foreign-made vaccine like Sputnik V or Sinovac). Also whether they want him to be vaccinated while at work or to use a doctor they have approved - there are black market ways to get things done. That said, it is conceivable they could require a test later that indicates its efficacy.
The vaccine trials had many exclusions for a variety of health conditions, and he could indicate that he has one of those conditions that were excluded from the trials and thus it is a health risk to take the vaccine. (This would probably require a sympathetic doctor).
Great Barrington Declaration (Over 50k doctors signed it) https://gbdeclaration.org/
When looking up this info, don't use Google, they are extremely biased. Almost any other search engine is better without all the mainstream disinfo.
unlike canada (canada are idiots on this)
The mask is a talisman. Not personal protective equipment.
It was an easy thing (though not politically thanks to the TV-news-watching lemmings) to remove the government mandate, because it doesn't really change anything with regard to the "social expectations".
Where I live, it's the businesses that are enforcing the mask mandate not the government (police). (Likely because of insurance companies?). So to go to work, buy things, all the businesses appear to require a mask.
I thought it was suspicious too, that everyone started using zoom immediately, whether it was schools or official hearings. I had never heard of Zoom before COVID. Why didn't they use Skype, GoToMeeting, LogMeIn, VNC, or another well-known service...
Bezos is also rich because of how his company profits from collecting customers' data - surveillance capitalism. Amazon would be worth much less if it did not have such an invasive presence in our lives.
Second commenter in above image is wrong.
"Harmful people" are the elites (billionaires, political/business "leaders") who use their control of society to crush the rest of us, take our freedoms and rights, divide us into groups that hate each other by using the media and "educational system" so we don't wake up, rise up and remove them from power.
Class (socioeconomic status, which in America is mainly measured by financial assets - itself a "social points" system that is thoroughly rigged by the financialisation of the economy, ie. Wall St.- note that the Deep Staters are all multimillionaires), not race/ethnicity or religion, is the big divider in America, and by keeping most of us poor and ignorant, the so-called elites retain power.
Clustering of paraphilic behavior is a well known phenomenon.
Freudian slip. "Being developed." Tell us more..
What's funny is Fauci is actually a Jesuit.
"Where they burn books, they will end in burning human beings." - Heinrich Heine https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/17802-where-they-have-burned-books-they-will-end-in-burning
"Bank of America" more like Bank of Soviet Union or China. F**k them.
Fauci being a literal blockhead.
Psych evaluations don't work on psychopaths, who are able to easily manipulate their therapists and others. And who may commit murder.
Making this bill totally useless
https://psychopathsinlife.com/does-therapy-work-on-psychopaths/
https://www.businessinsider.com/psychopathy-treatment-2017-8
https://narcopath.info/about-npd/narcissistic-abuse/mass-murderers/
Biden's ventriloquist is not so good.