Ok, but that has nothing to do with I was saying. The guy said they would present a different story and I said they can’t.
They can’t show a different story to the Supreme Court. In appeals, you can only present the facts from the original case. You cannot introduce new evidence.
No, I believe this is a civil case. Only the government can file criminal charges and prosecute.
Why hasn't it been submitted to court yet? I read most of the court filings this week and I don't think I saw anything about the servers.
Hopefully Georgia votes this asshole out of office in 2 years.
For real. If this dude spent half the time he spends on Twitter on actual lawsuits, this shit would have been done already.
I've never liked Rudy (or most NYCers for that matter), but gave him the benefit of the doubt when Trump hired him. Just have to wait to see how this all plays out.
Wtf? They haven’t filed any allegations of fraud yet? It’s been 3 weeks since the election and other battleground states are certifying this week.
Look, I'm a Christian, but I don't give a shit about religion or race as long as we're fighting for the same thing.
Haha, basically.
I think it just means they have to report how they're going to spend the money.
If you introduce new evidence that fundamentally changes your argument, you would need to file a new case and have the lower courts make a decision with this new evidence taken into account.
Remember: you’re appealing that the lower courts did not make the right decision given the facts available at the time. You can’t go to the Supreme Court with new evidence because they will say: “the lower courts did not have this evidence to consider, so maybe they would have ruled differently with this new info”. Then they’ll send the case back down.