Putting in fake upvotes has no excuse and would lead to a lot of problems if exposed. They excuse the removal of downvotes by saying they are not 'authentic engagement'.

Let the video play in the background most of the way through with the browser tab muted before you downvote.

If it was that windy you would hold the rail much tighter after your first stumble.

A real fact-checker would start with 'yes'. Various comparisons to other people, the weather, his excessive speed etc might go into a later section.

It could be written that 'Biden, with an athletic spring in his step, racing up the stairs in a windy setting tripped over, as many other people might at the age of 78.'

Throw in his old claim of 'I run up stairs while Trump has trouble going down them' if you want to put in some context.

A potato has to know his limitations.

Article says some of the content was filmed in his house. Who else would have made it?

The Spanish language is gendered for most words, with the plural of a group of males and females being 'latinos', even if there's just one man in the group. This type of patriarchal thinking needs to be combated wherever it arises, even if it is a cultural norm, with only 4% of latinos liking the change to 'latinx'.

What is the point of the marking directly in front of the machines? Where else are you going to stand?

The animals found out what happened in Venezuealan zoos ( https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5449023/Venezuelans-eat-rats-dogs-economy-nosedives.html ) , to the innocent cows in the fields ( https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5262257/Starving-mob-beat-cattle-death-rocks-Venezuela.html ) , and the cats and dogs.

They are thinking further ahead than the typical Democrat, and know what is in their best interest.

They already known in related fields. https://www.cnet.com/news/master-and-slave-tech-terms-face-scrutiny-amid-anti-racism-efforts/

There are new names for things now.

Have any of his classmates leaked anything about how he's doing? They can't all be supporters.

There are a lot of issues with this website.

• There is already a goodpillow.com company in Lithuania, that sells pillows. It was first registered 17 years ago.

• Hogg announced his plans in early February, had to get his last minute logo by 9 Feb for his Washington Post puff piece. The website still says '"will says sorry if website has bugs, he's been up all night & we didn't even have a logo this morning" - david' - so that message refers to perhaps the 7 or 8 Feb, and they still haven't fixed the issues more than a month later.

• They have a manifesto that starts with 'Seven days ago they said it could not be done', but there is no date on the manifesto, so who knows when it was written or what time period it refers to? There is a hint that says they will have to stop work on the pillow to focus on the Feb 14 celebration of the school shooting', so I'm guessing it was written 7-10 Feb.

• Lots of typos, not enough capitalisation, e.g. a patriot would capitalise their country, US.

• There are two links, one for 'join the waiting list', one for 'contact us', but they both take you to exactly the same contact page.

Original thoughts are not necessarily a good thing, most will end up being incorrect. His original thought was 'Anybody can start a profitable company that sells pillows at competitive prices, made by unionized Americans, managed by someone who went to a school where there was a shooting.' I am pretty sure that nobody in history has had this specific thought.

He should have stuck with unoriginal thoughts like 'it is hard to start a business', 'how much do people care about buying American versus price?', 'stick to what you know', 'it must take thousands of hours to build up an expertise in something.', 'most new businesses fail, what goes wrong?'

I had the same question, so went to clue.com. Clue.com turns out to be a primitive website for a small old IT consulting firm, that hasn't been updated for three years (most pages last updated July 2000). Why would they be posting shit about trans?

@Clue turns out to be a period tracker app. Very popular, with more than 1 million reviews, averaging 4.7.

Godaddy values the name 'clue.com' at >$25,000.

@Clue is so cheap or stupid that they can't scrape together $25k to buy up the name from a probably defunct one man band company. @Clue owns 'helloclue.com', which nobody would ever guess. It comes up 5th in my web searches, so at least it has that going for it.

Snopes dates it back to 2012, says it was photoshopped. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-woman-gun-photo/

They claim that it was "a rather mundane photograph showing Biden conversing with participants at a town hall event". The gun is absent but his menacing expression, leaning in, and finger pointing was in the original.

I have my concerns about Candace being a total grifter. While she has been saying the right things for a couple of years now she first came to prominence by starting/planning a doxxing site - SocialAutopsy.com

It was supposed to be 'anti-bullying', anti-hate-speech or something like that, and whether it was really opened to the public, was just in testing and canned is debated.

See this video from October 2017, where from timestamp 4:00 Candace herself explains how their website and database will work. Today I'm sure she's of the "there's no such thing as hate speech" correct position, but certainly not back in 2017.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRftGrshfTU

Perhaps she has reformed herself, but this was such an evil idea I don't see how someone escapes from proudly stating:

• "have someone that you'd like to add to our MORG? Our database is continuously grown by anonymous submissions from individuals like you. ... screenshot their harsh words and privately submit them to our database...",

• "SocialAutopsy is your digital footprint, so be mindful of the words that you share"

At 8:10 she explains that minors are to be doxxed as well, because they should have read the Terms of Service [100 pages??] on social media sites. The best time to be on their database is when they are a minor, so they can be brainwashed into correct speech as early as possible.

There's some good content in this video overall, explaining some of Candace's questionable history.

Bottom right Dr Who, turned main character into a woman after 50 years or so of being a man. Ratings on the last season down about 30% from previous year (which was already going down). As the BBC has unlimited power to force all TV viewers to pay a tax they don't care if they lose money by ruining a show.

Could also require company health insurance to pay for some of this.

Two of the genders get no bathroom at all.

She hasn't really thought this through. I guess you could store frozen sperm for 20 years to last for the next generation of women to reproduce, and after that the human race would end.

The letter references The Benefactor, which matches the date of the letter. So successful that it doesn't even have a thumbnail or description on IMDB. Average 2.7/10 from 42 votes.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0410964/reviews?ref_=tt_urv

Three reviews:

• Horrible
• Pretty dumb
• I just saw an episode, and will not be watching again

It will simply inflate the price of the available commodities. Blowjobs will now cost $5.

Who says they're not sending their best? It does take some imagination, spirit, planning, risk-taking attitude and savings to invade another country. Their very best will take the legal route, but these are their next best.

There's a 1/2 second shot of a white girl exposing a breast, can't remember the context but it was in a dancing scenario. Maybe 13 years old. Other than that you're correct (at least in the first half I bothered to watch).

Cancelled Netflix after Cuties, don't miss it. After a few months it was hard to find anything to watch there anyway. I think they spend a lot on new content, but it was all garbage.

The standard in the UK for investigating a poster is if you, or anyone on your supposed behalf, feels that something is 'offensive'. There is no objective standard, just the perception.

She was in Suits, a reasonable law/drama TV series. The first four or so series were worth watching. Her role started off as small, and as it increased the series went downhill. It seems she has a toxic effect on anything she gets involved with.