I'm in my late thirties and gave it up 4 months ago. First week was hell, but since then it's been better sleep, less brain fog, more energy.
Boycotts are not cancel culture. Boycotts target businesses with a goal of changing how they conduct their business. Cancel culture targets individuals with a goal of silencing and destroying them.
The hysteria is real, but the only reasonable analysis I've heard is this:
N95 filter the air you breathe in, protecting you but nobody else. At-risk people should be wearing these.
Surgical masks block your droplets when you sneeze or cough, protecting other people but not you. Non-at-risk people should be wearing these.
Gaiter type masks aerosolize your droplets. Nobody should be wearing these.
Of course the media and/or the public are too stupid to understand nuance, so in practice we have 70% of people wearing gaiters and making the problem worse for everyone.
Speculation: the voting machines are not connected to networks - as a precaution against backing - so their results are copied to a flash drive and brought to a PC for upload.
They define their group in terms of underperformance and them complain that they're underperforming.
Going fully electric in the distant future is virtually guaranteed. All of our energy ultimately comes from the sun; fossil fuels are just a really convenient natural packaging. Eventually technology should give us more efficient ways to capture and store the sun's energy.
The problem is mandating the switch to inferior energy sources right now, rather than allowing better technology to develop and get cheap enough that nobody will even want to use fossils.
It's not even a secret that dems are low into voters, they don't even try to hide it. They push this vague idea of "dems good, repubs bad" into the culture, and then they run huge "get out the vote" campaigns. They make no attempt to educate potential voters; they just want them to show up and fill out a ballot according to their feelings.
But like, she would obviously want to keep her senate seat and vote on stuff until just before her inauguration as VP.
The ones that are creased in two places?
It's not a federal election, it's 50 individual state elections. For all the Constitution cares, a state could pick its electors by flipping a coin. SCOTUS's role here is to make sure the state followed its own laws.
Voting just once and getting your ballot in on time is white culture.
The media cannot be dead and stealing elections at the same time. Unfortunately a large number of people still get their news from the MSM.
Friday of Color. Not to be confused with Colored Friday.
I have a background in math and unfortunately this video is bogus. Look towards the bottom of the comments for in depth discussion, but suffice to say Shiva has set up the charts in a way that they are guaranteed to result in a linear pattern with a negative slope.
They do this by plotting the difference between these voters' Trump % to the the straight Republican voters' split.
This is the problem right here. He is creating a function with y dependent on x, and then acting surprised that there is a relationship between y and x.
Doesn't this just mean in precincts where Republicans used the straight ticket option more, there were less available people to vote Trump?
I thought so at first too, but realize he said the independent votes and straight party votes were separate data sets. Each data set should have proportions that add up to 100%.
Thank you. I'm also an engineer and came to the same conclusion, but felt like I must be missing something.
TLDR: The guy set his y-axis as y = -x + t, where x is the number of straight ticket voters and t is the number of independent Trump voters. He himself said t should be constant, therefore he is plotting a linear function with a negative slope.
The JSON is from NYT's API. The raw data comes from Edison Research. If caching were the issue you would see the vote totals revert to a previous number, not for votes to transfer from one candidate to another.
I went to their website. They very clearly offer a real time vote counting service in addition to exit polling. Not sure if you're blind or shilling.
The data set, instead of having the vote counts for each candidate, has a total number of votes and a fraction for each candidate.
It looks roughly like this: votes: 1234567 biden: 0.654 trump: 0.321
When you're dealing with a 6 or 7 digit number and multiply by a 3 digit decimal, precision is lost; you don't know exactly how many votes go for each candidate.
Looking at the fake example above, 0.001 of 1,234,567 is 1,235.
Biden's actual vote count could be anywhere between 807,406 and 808,641.
Trump's actual vote count could be anywhere between 396,296 and 397,530.
It's often used as a code for "unknown".
No, fuck all these ideas about how to get petty revenge on Biden and others. We stand for America First. If recognizing Taiwan were good for America, then Trump should have done it ages ago. If it's bad for America, then doing it just to spite Biden would be a fucked up move.
Dem excuse makes no sense. They report in batches, so they should start reporting at the same time as everyone else. It would just take longer for them to finish.
Trump is America First. He didn't make peace in the Middle East as a personal favor to Netanyahu, he did it because it's good for America. Netanyahu is irrelevant.
They totally can. See Roe v Wade for an easy example.