This is not Monica Bellucci, who incidentally was 46 at the time this photo — of "Lena" / Лена — was taken (in 2011) by Ukrainian photographer Alina Troeva, possibly a self-portrait.
Are they not just running the Election/Capitol False Flag again, only this time it's the Economy/SEC. If this were something legitimately threatening, they'll just change or ignore the laws to achieve whatever outcome they want and the media will go along with it. What am I missing?
Reporter:
'It has recently been announced, by you in fact, that there will be "truth and transparency" from now on, but so far you haven't actually answered a single question, despite hosting several hours of briefings thus far. Can you elaborate on how this is consistent with the new policy?'
JP:
'Oh, of course. It's really a great question. Well, as you well know, this administration is under no obligation to respond at this time or in the future, so we really only know about as much as you do regarding this. You should know that by now, honestly, you sick bastard. We've gone over this before. It's actually quite shameful. You keep asking questions when we've told you repeatedly to stop doing it. We'd all like certain answers but, when we're honest with ourselves, I think we know that doesn't mean we're entitled to them. Let's not be shameful. It's time to leave the ways of the old administration behind. The president will have a comment on this when and if he deigns to do so, and honestly I'm going to have to circle back, but thank you for asking me that annoying, traitorous question. Why am I the only one without a mask while telling everyone there are no exceptions to mask wearing in the press room? Sorry, was that last part aloud?'
No need to force people to get injections when you can just make them eat the vaccine: https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2020/05/gmo-tomato-as-edible-covid-vaccine-mexican-scientists-work-to-make-it-a-reality
And I know what it is: https://thedonald.win/p/11S13tiFOz/-live-eas-broadcast-audio-/
Teaser of the follow-up article: https://i.imgur.com/ipGLr1N.png
My point here is to direct attention to the inconsistencies in what I've seen posted. I haven't given any opinion or conjecture here, so I don't see how I'm "playing checkers". What I'm actually doing is encouraging discussion and thought.
All I know about this is what I gleaned in the last few minutes, in order to respond to this post, but the idea is as follows: there exist these photos allegedly depicting Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, allegedly taken by Frank Marshall Davis, who has been alleged to be Obama's biological father. Allegedly.
https://imgur.com/a/QfqBac6 — Last one is her also. Same lamp in the background; same earrings, etc. I'm not aware of any legitimate others, though I take your point.
I don't get what the endgame is for any of these people. They don't need the money (and, if they did, there would be plenty of easier ways for a sociopath to be 'set for life'); they don't have any real power, per se; they don't have any grand vision to speak of, or implement, misguided or otherwise. It's all just pretend. And sure, if you're a ruthless sociopath, you can manipulate many things to bend to your will, but for what purpose? The sheer enjoyment of being perceived to have played the game and won? Most of the attention they get is negative. If history does speak of them, it won't speak kindly, so I'm just baffled. How smart can they really be, if they can't see that? A reasonably intelligent/determined person who does nothing with their life but try to become president could probably get pretty close. Most people aren't trying to do this because they can see it isn't a worthwhile use of a life.