1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't get what the endgame is for any of these people. They don't need the money (and, if they did, there would be plenty of easier ways for a sociopath to be 'set for life'); they don't have any real power, per se; they don't have any grand vision to speak of, or implement, misguided or otherwise. It's all just pretend. And sure, if you're a ruthless sociopath, you can manipulate many things to bend to your will, but for what purpose? The sheer enjoyment of being perceived to have played the game and won? Most of the attention they get is negative. If history does speak of them, it won't speak kindly, so I'm just baffled. How smart can they really be, if they can't see that? A reasonably intelligent/determined person who does nothing with their life but try to become president could probably get pretty close. Most people aren't trying to do this because they can see it isn't a worthwhile use of a life.

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it Groundhog Day? Wait, no ... Howdy Doody Time?

3
cogent 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is not Monica Bellucci, who incidentally was 46 at the time this photo — of "Lena" / Лена — was taken (in 2011) by Ukrainian photographer Alina Troeva, possibly a self-portrait.

0
cogent 0 points ago +1 / -1

I realize you're just copying what the earlier comment said, since you both spelled her name wrong, but this isn't Monica Bellucci.

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely not.

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

If their coffee weren't usually complete acrid garbage, the Starbucks Generation might even have been worth it. Maybe the reeducation camps can include a mandatory module on roasting and extraction.

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are they not just running the Election/Capitol False Flag again, only this time it's the Economy/SEC. If this were something legitimately threatening, they'll just change or ignore the laws to achieve whatever outcome they want and the media will go along with it. What am I missing?

2
cogent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reporter:

'It has recently been announced, by you in fact, that there will be "truth and transparency" from now on, but so far you haven't actually answered a single question, despite hosting several hours of briefings thus far. Can you elaborate on how this is consistent with the new policy?'

JP:

'Oh, of course. It's really a great question. Well, as you well know, this administration is under no obligation to respond at this time or in the future, so we really only know about as much as you do regarding this. You should know that by now, honestly, you sick bastard. We've gone over this before. It's actually quite shameful. You keep asking questions when we've told you repeatedly to stop doing it. We'd all like certain answers but, when we're honest with ourselves, I think we know that doesn't mean we're entitled to them. Let's not be shameful. It's time to leave the ways of the old administration behind. The president will have a comment on this when and if he deigns to do so, and honestly I'm going to have to circle back, but thank you for asking me that annoying, traitorous question. Why am I the only one without a mask while telling everyone there are no exceptions to mask wearing in the press room? Sorry, was that last part aloud?'

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you missed the point of the post. It doesn't need to age, well or otherwise.

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's really something that needs to be heard to be understood.

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless the idea is that Maj. Gen. William J. Walker, Trump-appointed commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, will also decide that "Commander-in-Chief" is just an honorific.

4
cogent 4 points ago +4 / -0

My point here is to direct attention to the inconsistencies in what I've seen posted. I haven't given any opinion or conjecture here, so I don't see how I'm "playing checkers". What I'm actually doing is encouraging discussion and thought.

2
cogent 2 points ago +2 / -0

All I know about this is what I gleaned in the last few minutes, in order to respond to this post, but the idea is as follows: there exist these photos allegedly depicting Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, allegedly taken by Frank Marshall Davis, who has been alleged to be Obama's biological father. Allegedly.

1
cogent 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://imgur.com/a/QfqBac6 — Last one is her also. Same lamp in the background; same earrings, etc. I'm not aware of any legitimate others, though I take your point.

10
cogent 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's funny to see how information sharing platforms are stalling out while high-bandwidth distraction services run smooth.

view more: Next ›