Granted if it is true I could say then why do you have to then stoop low as him. All it ends up is making you look like a hypocrite.
I guess that's true. It's just that there are people who say why should we respect this guy's passing even though he disrespect other people's passing. All I just want to see is if there is actual evidence that he actually has this so-called "AIDS Update". The reason why the argument needs to be counter is that this is their talking point that I think should be addressed by seeing whether this allegation is true.
Now I heard many critics claim he had what's called the "AIDS Update" where they say he made fun of people who died of aids. Is this true? Disclaimer, I'm not here to bash Rush Limbaugh but I think we have to counter this argument as many are using this argument as a justification to dance over his grave. For example, Snopes here claiming this "allegation" to be true. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rush-limbaugh-mock-aids-gays/
I see all you guys complain about how unfair it is but instead let's focus on what we can do better. You might say well it's futile as the courts are corrupt but here's the thing by doing nothing you're guaranteed to fail. I rather have a 5% chance of success than having none. Let's figure what could have been done better as there's always room for improvement.