12
cornsyrupconsumer 12 points ago +12 / -0

Well, look at Africa. They are certainly "acting black", and yes, they are uncivilized.

1
cornsyrupconsumer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh yes, it's Lyndon B Johnsons fault that blacks are incompetent. Cope. Welfare policies only destroyed Black people, not any other race... why could that be...? No, I don't trust Lyndon B Johnson. He was a brilliant politician that was able to manufacture the party switch myth. Why is he relevant to this convo? I am talking about sealed FBI documents (which were never released, until 2019), not Lyndon B Johnson.

1
cornsyrupconsumer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am a big believer in the Lincoln plan on "negro colonization". We should have apologized for slavery, gave them a generous severance package, helped them establish Liberia, and left them alone. I don't believe Blacks and Whites should live in the same society. We are incredibly different, and Whites will always be blamed for their shortcomings.

1
cornsyrupconsumer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Subversion is a slow and steady process. Yes, there were globohomo elements in the government since the inception. However, the more time goes on, the more power the subverters attained.

1
cornsyrupconsumer 1 point ago +2 / -1

So what's your point? He was surrounded by Jewish Communists, which were attempting to subvert and overthrow our country (they were obviously successful) . Of course the government was trying to prevent the subversion, but they failed ultimately. Do you have any evidence that it was a smear campaign based on lies?

1
cornsyrupconsumer 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was backed by Jewish Communists, so of course he was under investigation. His speeches were written by Jewish Communist Bolshevists. Of course his public facing image was a Christian, gun owning, Republican - that's how you trick the boomers! 'Oh look, he's just like us'! They pick relatable puppets, because their tricks wouldn't work otherwise.

3
cornsyrupconsumer 3 points ago +3 / -0

WTF lol... accuse me of being a glowie because I cite sealed FBI documents from the 1950? I don't think you know what "glowing" means

3
cornsyrupconsumer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Huh? You really think the military/FBI of the 1950's is the same as the military/FBI of today? Are you serious?

2
cornsyrupconsumer 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Let us say boldly that if the violations of law by the white man in the slums over the years were calculated and compared with the law-breaking of a few days of riots, the hardened criminal would be the white man. These are often difficult things to say but I have come to see more and more that it is necessary to utter the truth in order to deal with the great problems that we face in our society.”

2
cornsyrupconsumer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope, at the very least he excused the violence. “Let us say boldly that if the violations of law by the white man in the slums over the years were calculated and compared with the law-breaking of a few days of riots, the hardened criminal would be the white man. These are often difficult things to say but I have come to see more and more that it is necessary to utter the truth in order to deal with the great problems that we face in our society.”

0
cornsyrupconsumer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are those quotes from his speech, that was written by his Jewish puppet masters? Of course that is what they will present to the public, that's how it works. They have a public, and a private position. Here is a quote of his in 1967 - “Let us say boldly that if the violations of law by the white man in the slums over the years were calculated and compared with the law-breaking of a few days of riots, the hardened criminal would be the white man. These are often difficult things to say but I have come to see more and more that it is necessary to utter the truth in order to deal with the great problems that we face in our society.”

2
cornsyrupconsumer 2 points ago +3 / -1

The FBI from the 1950's is not the FBI of today. The same way the military from the 1950's is not the military of today.

7
cornsyrupconsumer 7 points ago +8 / -1

Great man? He was a Jewish puppet that was okay with anti-White violence. The only reason he was nonviolent was because that would be the best way to achieve his goals. He was also a first-hand witness to several rapes (and did nothing), according to FBI documents.

-2
cornsyrupconsumer -2 points ago +3 / -5

Nope, MLK was okay with anti-White violence. He claimed the only reason he was nonviolent was because it would achieve his goals. He would be damn proud of Democrats today!

1
cornsyrupconsumer 1 point ago +7 / -6

MLK was a rape apologist, he witnessed his friend rape several woman, first-hand. This is revealed in FBI documents. He also claimed that the only reason he promoted nonviolence, is because violence would not achieve his goals. He was okay with political violence against Whites. Time to stop worshipping this POS , he tricked boomers into giving away our country to non-Whites, that's why we are in the position we are in today. Also, his speeches were written by anti-White Jews.

27
cornsyrupconsumer 27 points ago +27 / -0

Omg! We can like, never organize IRL again because the big bad FBI will get us... This is exactly what they wanted. We need to organize IRL, but in a lawful, peaceful manner. Obviously many innocent people caught up in the capitol, but we can't let that scare us.

8
cornsyrupconsumer 8 points ago +9 / -1

No, the law abiding cucks will hand over their firearms and go make a meme about it. Those were red blooded patriots walking the walk, and everyone here shunned them and cucked out. Sad.

4
cornsyrupconsumer 4 points ago +4 / -0

This party is just getting started. White men, you haven't seen nothing yet. Wait until they start seizing your land and assets for reparations. Better wise up White men, we will hang together or hang separately.

2
cornsyrupconsumer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Germany was an absolute wreck before Hitler took power. Their culture was already washed out by Jewish Bolshevists (that promoted trannies, pedophilia, etc). Can you provide a source on the catholics point? From what I understand, he visited both the catholic and protestant churches regularly but he wanted them to unite under aryanism. Taking over Europe? His hand was forced because allies broke their neutrality agreements with nations surrounding Germany. If he did nothing, Germany would have been surrounded and put down without a fight.

0
cornsyrupconsumer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hitler loved his people, never disarmed his people, embraced his peoples history and tradition, improved the education, promoted 'positive Christianity', and basically created their military from scratch.

1
cornsyrupconsumer 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. They want to genocide whites, it isn't about 'dividing everyone'

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›