What happened to holding news organization liable for defamation? I don't care if they play the "anonymous source" bit, if their story is a fabrication they need to be punished financially. Better yet, hold the reporter, the editor and the company accountable as all of them must be involved to make the story happen. This is complete bullshit. Their reporting is National Enquirer level b.s.
I remember seeing that many years ago and it was as relevant then as it is now. This blackittude has been going on for decades and they're never held accountable. In today's limp wristed society they're accommodated/rewarded for their thug behavior.
The fact that this sort of thing is even satirizable is symptomatic of just how far society has fallen. The soft handed treatment of the people involved in these terrorist acts is pathetic. They should be crushed, not coddled.
Do I think he should have been shot? No. Was the officer incompetent? Yes. Bottom line however is that he would still be alive today if he had just stood still. That's as much caring as I can muster for a piece of shit thug.
Stelter's head always makes me think of a big tranny thumb.