6
cryogen 6 points ago +6 / -0

What's done by Congress can be undone by Congress, SCOTUS, and/or Constitutional Convention of the States.

1
cryogen 1 point ago +1 / -0

L to R::

Murray Rothbard Ron Paul Top: Ayn Rand Bottom: Hans Hermann Hoppe David Friedman Frederic Bastiat Ludwig von Mises Friedrich Hayek

Do I get a cookie...? :)

3
cryogen 3 points ago +3 / -0

These motherfuckers aren't just evil. They're dumb as rocks. They believe their own bullshit. They trust NYT and WaPo. They see nothing untoward about the election. They're perplexed because the rest of us aren't as fucking retarded as they are. We all know Trump won. He has 75 million supporters. AT LEAST. Biden has nothing compared to that. He had ballots, not votes. He has no real support. I know it, you know it, we all know it. I wonder if journos know it, but it seems that they're simply so stupid that they don't.

3
cryogen 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the Patriot Party scenario, the upper echelons of the Party can be independent, new, different. Republicans will ALWAYS be RINOs because you simply can't take over the top of an organization with like 50 billionaires and companies. You could take out 3-5 if you're lucky, 10-25 if you're a miracle worker; the remaining 25 will simply retaliate and recover and you're left with RINOs again. Republican Party is a zombie, dead party walking.

0
cryogen 0 points ago +2 / -2

They both have cases pending review by SCOTUS. You can shove it up your ass.

1
cryogen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually given this and the Time article, I think their plans for rigging future elections, though they do exist, are less certain or sure now. Probably this sort of thing can only be done once every so often when you're getting caught by as many people as they did this time. While I have no doubt they will attempt to rig everything they can every which way, they might be worried that they won't be able to pull it off like they did here.

2
cryogen 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's about domination. They're showing that no male-only circles are allowed, first of all, as a show of power. And then they amplify that by showing that female-only circles are allowed, and even in the symbology, resources, and institutions that they've stolen from the males. Pure evil.

9
cryogen 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lmao. It's a branch of government. What you suggest is totally impossible.

7
cryogen 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yet defending the country, when/if it comes to that, will require communicating, including commenting on the internet....

1
cryogen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly this. A single vote is not the end of this, people. Fight like hell until they vote the right way.

7
cryogen 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is and always was pure shit.

6
cryogen 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep, and everyone always repeats the obvious fact that "Biden gets more mail-ins" as if that explains everything. The margins for Biden in the swing state mail-in votes are obviously and patently absurd. They do not track with other numbers across the country. The point is that you can't have these results with 70-30 Biden or even 80-20 Biden, or in many cases even 90-10 Biden is not enough. These people don't know math or complex systems or they shut their brain off because the reality is too scary for them to contemplate. Some of these dumps the margin is +95-5. That's not real. Anybody who believes it is has been deluded.

2
cryogen 2 points ago +2 / -0

What he's saying is that the GOP would be forced to choose between MAGA and Dems. Some segment would definitely cooperate with MAGA rather than Dems, probably ~50%.

5
cryogen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Damage has been done now, right? Isn't that, seemingly, what a lot of these courts have been asking for?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›