2
d909 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll wreck the shit where they live now, then see that we still have nice shit and move to red states. Then they'll wreck that shit too.

1
d909 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eh, the leftist canceling machine will try to get anyone who publicly opposes them fired. She could get in trouble for even what she just said. Fear keeps many people left.

1
d909 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those places are expensive and crime ridden, why would they want to live there?

5
d909 5 points ago +5 / -0

They're not legal residents. They should be treated like tourists for census purposes. Alas, mass illegal immigration is not something the founders considered, and the constitution really does simply say all "persons" are to be counted.

1
d909 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely not. I simply don't completely trust Zerohedge.

1
d909 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sorry, I don't remember. It was years ago.

I don't want to imply that Zerohedge is somehow worse than other media outlets - sloppy reporting is the norm in most MSM outlets as well. Just saying use your brain and don't trust everything completely just because they're ideologically on the right side.

7
d909 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup! The founders provided a way to change it if necessary, but liberals can't even convince a simple majority of the country to implement their nonsense, let alone the required numbers for an amendment, so they invented this living document bullshit to justify just doing whatever they want without actual public support.

5
d909 5 points ago +7 / -2

I don't know about that. Several years back I read a non political article on there on a subject I am a relative expert on, and they were thoroughly full of shit, like they put very little effort in to being factually correct. Not sure I trust their journalism quality after that, but at least they're not leftist, thank heaven.

5
d909 5 points ago +5 / -0

And of course, they've been ramping this nonsense up this year because of the coming election.

14
d909 14 points ago +14 / -0

In the world she would create, she will be killed for being too white.

36
d909 36 points ago +36 / -0

Trump has a lot of power, but he doesn't control the country. The left does, and their culture does not resemble ours. The analogy is appropriate.

2
d909 2 points ago +2 / -0

Surely globally spreading hate against a global minority will result in love and cooperation!

3
d909 3 points ago +3 / -0

I suspect they don't see right wing political views as political views.

25
d909 25 points ago +25 / -0

And look what happens when we unexpectedly manage to get a President who isn't. Years of nonstop negative coverage, coup attempts, and chaos from the left. Will anyone after Trump be willing to endure this?

24
d909 24 points ago +24 / -0

Something tells me that California will only enforce that political beliefs law if the person who got fired is leftist.

2
d909 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder if you maybe have this backwards. Elected leaders aren't bowing to their demands so much as the rioters are doing as they've been trained by those leaders.

3
d909 3 points ago +3 / -0

You still have assets. Correction, HAD assets. They belong to the oppressed now.

17
d909 17 points ago +17 / -0

You must realize that the more likely outcome is that they'll blame the spike in crime on racism. That, or they'll simply not have any way of calculating crime rates since its currently done by police arrests / charges / convictions and such, and so they'll pretend things are fine.

2
d909 2 points ago +2 / -0

This will never happen without a civil war first.

12
d909 12 points ago +13 / -1

14% nationally. Some states a little more, some a little less. A lot of swing states are very near that number. 10% of 14% is 1.4%. So, GOP going from 10% black support to 20% black support in theory means a gain of 1.4% of the vote. We lost minnesota by 1.5% last election. Won Wisconsin and Pennsylvania by 0.7%. Won Michigan by 0.3%. Won Florida by 1.2%.
So yes, gaining that much of the black vote could be very meaningful for Trump!

19
d909 19 points ago +20 / -1

Dems normally get over 90% of the black vote. Move that to 80% and swing states are a lot more likely to swing red.

2
d909 2 points ago +2 / -0

While I get what you're saying, democrats absolutely do discriminate - against asians and whites.

4
d909 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because theres such an overabundance of psychiatrists.

1
d909 1 point ago +2 / -1

Law and order? Who needs it. It doesn't exist in the third world countries the left's voters all came from, so why would they want it here? This is just politicians responding to their constituency.

view more: Next ›