I honestly think that we should end universal suffrage. I think that married males should have the right to vote for the following reasons:

1. families, not landonwers or individuals, are the building block of society.
2. married men, as the leaders of their homes, have a vested interest in keeping society sane and functioning. There will be some variation about what this means and not all married men will want the same thing, sure.

In this context refers to private- vs government-owned. So they are private companies in that sense.

Controlled and protected.

If he's not ok, why would he tweet that we will have a giant voice well into the future?

What's wrong with Epoch Times?

Funny enough, Predictit closed their presidential market in favor of Biden. Hope that have enough funds to pay the real winners.

Did something new happen?

Bro I've been reppin MAGA, stop the steal, and TDW in chess.com like no one's business

I'm telling you, this "hack" we've been hearing about is really about getting all the "classified" info out to the public.

Always has been

? where?

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315283

I think the point is that you needed to declare BEFORE getting the ballot.

The voters had to identify BEFORE voting and show an ID to get a ballot. The clerk and gov declared everyone indefinitely confined and blindly sent out ballots.

True, but the main point is that the SCOWI ruled that only the voter can declare themselves "indefinitely" defined. All those votes without ID are in trouble

idk, but sounds to me like all the mail in votes without voter ID are INVALID!

From the conclusion: Accordingly, we conclude that the Respondents' interpretation of Wisconsin's election laws is erroneous. Additionally, we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render all Wisconsin electors "indefinitely confined," thereby obviating the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot

I hope the truth is coming out!

The link: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315283

idk, if they're letting it out, it must not be too bad? I hope it's a bombshell, but something is weird here.

They blocked the report?

The title on YT has "COAR" at the end. What does COAR stand for?

In reality, this isn't unprecedented. SCOTUS has already ruled on state elections processes on federal elections. Prior SCOTUS opinions note that these are federal questions under federal jurisdiction.

This is a bad headline, lol. It sounds like they are protesting the call to decertify and not protesting and calling for decertification.

Um, but they don't need his permission. The Federal Constitution gives them the absolute authority to meet over this. Even their own state constitution can't stop them.